Back GraywallsWikipedia talk:Notability • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Wikipedia talk:Notability (Log · Page History)
User Graywalls (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 50
Minor edits 0 (0%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 1 (2%)
atbe1 39.1
Added (bytes)2 18,899
Deleted (bytes) -4,320
Minor edits · 0 (0%)
Major edits · 50 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 50 (100%)
Reverted edits · 1 (2%)
Unreverted edits · 49 (98%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 416
Diff · History 311 Notability standard for restaurants?: Reply
Diff · History 230 GNG and sources relation to claims of notability: Reply
Diff · History 382 Notability standard for restaurants?: Reply
Diff · History 354 Notability standard for restaurants?: Reply
Diff · History 65 Notability standard for restaurants?:
Diff · History 12 Notability standard for restaurants?:
Diff · History 499 Notability standard for restaurants?: Reply
Diff · History 194 Notability standard for restaurants?: Reply
Diff · History 419 Notability standard for restaurants?:
Diff · History 343 Notability standard for restaurants?: Reply
Diff · History 294 Notability standard for restaurants?: Reply
Diff · History 745 Notability standard for restaurants?: Reply
Diff · History 293 Notability standard for restaurants?:
Diff · History 42 Notability standard for restaurants?:
Diff · History 409 Notability standard for restaurants?: Reply
Diff · History 266
Diff · History 351 Concerns about NBAND #5: Reply
Diff · History 15
Diff · History 125 Concerns about NBAND #5: Reply
Diff · History 152 Refocus the discussion re NBAND: Reply
Diff · History 180 Notability guideline for police/law enforcement/similar bodies:
Diff · History -4,319 Restored revision 1171452245 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk): Reverting vandalism - patent nonsense dump
Diff · History -159 (reverted)  Reverted 1 edit by 152.32.100.198 (talk): Vand.
Diff · History 365 Concerns about NBAND #5: Reply
Diff · History 201 Refocus the discussion re NBAND:
Diff · History 243 Refocus the discussion re NBAND:
Diff · History 254 Concerns about NBAND #5:
Diff · History 451 Concerns about NBAND #5:
Diff · History 28 Concerns about NBAND #5: I thought at one point GNG actually directly referred to NCORP but I guess not.
Diff · History 205 Concerns about NBAND #5:
Diff · History 485 Concerns about NBAND #5: Replying to Jclemens about NORG vs GNG
Diff · History 65 Concerns about NBAND #5:
Diff · History 161 Concerns about NBAND #5:
Diff · History -1
Diff · History 19 Concerns about NBAND #5:
Diff · History 1,035
Diff · History 481 Appropriate SNG for record labels/recording companies:
Diff · History 171 Appropriate SNG for record labels/recording companies:
Diff · History 339
Diff · History 658 Need clearer consensus interpretation of significant coverage and audience.:
Diff · History 279 Need clearer consensus interpretation of significant coverage and audience.:
Diff · History 2,430
Diff · History 877 NPEOPLE vs NORG for artists collectives:
Diff · History 1,243 NORG / NPEOPLE
Diff · History 583 Notability standards for software and apps: include example
Diff · History 594 asking questions regarding software notability standards
Diff · History 873 Where does coverage in alternative weekly papers fall for notability validation?:
Diff · History 126 Where does coverage in alternative weekly papers fall for notability validation?:
Diff · History 636 Alternative papers
All times are in UTC.