Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kdkatpir2
Kdkatpir2
[edit]request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 20:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC) |
- Kdkatpir2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- WTAEchick (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Kd lvr (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: G
User:Kd lvr voted in favor of keeping the Ken Rice article during its AfD discussion, followed exactly one minute later by a "keep" vote from User:Kdkatpir2. See [1]. In addition, on two occasions ([2], ,[3]) the two have voted "keep" on an AfD on the Stacy Smith article in enough time where it is possible to post as one, sign out, sign in as the other user and post again.
I encountered these on a sanity check when a couple of other users suspected sockpuppetry. While ordinarily RFCUs shouldn't be filed while votes are underway, to my eyes this is so blatant as to warrant an exception. Blueboy96 20:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- This is the whole category of the suspected sockpuppets of User:Kdkatpir2 [4]. User(s) continue to troll talk pages and KDKA-TV. - SVRTVDude (VT) 20:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- User use same writing style on all accounts, and he has slipped one time, almost exposing his sock games. Vandalism and Page Ownership are also a problem, but his sockpuppetry is out of hand.
Kdkatpir2 and Kd lvr are Unrelated. No evidence offered regarding WTAEchick, and with no edits by that account, I see no reason to run a check: Declined. Dmcdevit·t 00:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.