Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 February 10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Remember the POW's CD.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Domer48 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The file is a CD cover that is used in the article of Irish rebel song, in which it is claimed by the uploader that the file will [illustrate] the views and opinions of Republican Prisoners and how they perceive themselves and their situation/conditions. However, the file provides minimal contextual significance, as nothing much are shown in the file apart from a man holding a gun (some cited interview with republicans or even a quote will serve this purpose better), and was merely used as a replicable illustration. Moreover, {{Non-free album cover}} was applied on the file, which is expected solely to illustrate the audio recording in question rather than using on an entire genre.

The file therefore violates WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10b, and should be therefore deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 02:43, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - the lack of this image in the article would not detract from any reader's understanding of that type of music. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phillip Bentz.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stundra (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The PD tag is obviously incorrect as the uploader is not copyright holder. The given source site claims "Digital image copyright 2003, Murray City Corporation. All rights reserved." but I am dubious. This is a scan (uncreative) of a photo so no new copyright is created. The photo description states "Phillip Bentz, Murray City Mayor from 1910-1911" and so is likely PD due to copyright expiring. There is no publication information, but it would seem highly unlikely to take a photo of a mayor and then squirrel it away so publication probably is okay. The image is unused but if PD can be established it would be in scope for Commons. Whpq (talk) 03:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Relicense to PD-US-expired and copy to Commons. Salavat (talk) 04:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree that file should be relicensed and exported to Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 18:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to non-free -FASTILY 10:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:969 Movement Flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RowanJ LP (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Source states NC-ND license, should be converted to fair use. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The damage caused by a RIRA bomb.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Domer48 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The file shows the aftermath of a Real Irish Republican Army bombing in 2000 (in this section). As the image is only used to illustrate one of the many bombings committed by the group in Northern Ireland (rather than a specific attack), any possible free depictions of other bombings can also serve the same purpose. Moreover, the file doesn't contain much information on the bombing (such as to what extent were train services disrupted) apart from showing a hole and warped tracks, so it's contextual significance is minimal. The file therefore violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:8 Squadron RAF.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by H1523702 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

UK crown copyright expired no later than 1994 (as this badge was approved in December 1943). Replaced with File:No. 8 Squadron RAF badge.png on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 04:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:9 Squadron RAF.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by H1523702 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

UK crown copyright expired no later than 1987 (as the badge was approved in 1936). Replaced with File:No. 9 Squadron RAF badge.png on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 04:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.