Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vachette Pathology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vachette Pathology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small private company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:ORGCRIT. No indication of being notable. scope_creep^Talk 19:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete seems like a business practice that might have shifted the industry, but I can find no evidence that it did. Just founder name drops. StarM 03:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: only trivial mentions in the two sources that could have proved notability (cap). The sources also don't reference the company very much either, the CEO is only quoted. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.