Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamemode one
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gamemode one (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable organization that fails to satisfy NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search turns up nothing but primary sources and social media websites. Celestina007 (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
While searching "Gamemode One" directly does not yield significant results, searching "Gamemode One Minecraft" will give results including articles and videos on Gamemode One, as well as companies that are affiliated with Gamemode One. Included are articles mentioning Gamemode One at Microsoft / Mojang / Xbox. Featuring from Bridge [1] Blockbench [2] Gamerant [3] Screenrant and more. Searching for products by Gamemode One also drives results and a vast array of news articles on products including TechRadar [4] RadioTimes [5] and the Metro, Tech Radar, and IGN. ThomasOUK(talk) 23:54, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Gamemode One". Bridge Editor.
- ^ "Blockbench". Blockbench.
- ^ "Minecraft Bloom Guide: Everything You Need to Know". Gamerant.
- ^ "Sonic the Hedgehog might make me play Minecraft for the first time". Techradar.
- ^ Leane, Rob. "Minecraft How to Train Your Dragon DLC: Trailer, price and details for the new Berk pack". RadioTimes.
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom, the subject does not satisfy WP:NCORP. DMySon (talk) 13:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete lack of significant coverage in reliable independent sources, fails WP:NCORP.Brayan ocaner (talk) 17:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am able to bring in some more references mentioning Gamemode One / Gamemode One products, is there any recommendations you could make that would make it satisfy NCORP? (Conflict of interest registered on user page) ThomasOUK (talk) 19:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Can't find anything to meet WP:NCORP. No in-depth coverage exists in reliable sources as far as I can see. Samsmachado (talk) 22:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. I have been unable to find any references that meet NCORP criteria, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 15:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.