X’s image generator makes election fraud images NPR was able to produce depictions that appear to show ballot drop boxes being stuffed and of Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump holding firearms.

X’s chatbot can now generate AI images. A lack of guardrails raises election concerns

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/nx-s1-5078636/nx-s1-fca55765-2c0b-4290-a8d9-f0c88e3d4f1b" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

There's a new AI image tool out there. It's part of X, formerly known as Twitter. You can give it a prompt, and in response, it can generate a photo-realistic image. But unlike similar tools, there seem to be fewer restrictions on the kinds of images it can create, and that has some people worried about how it could be used this election season. We're joined now by NPR's Huo Jingnan. Hi there.

HUO JINGNAN, BYLINE: Hello.

SHAPIRO: There are already a number of AI image generators available. What makes this one different?

JINGNAN: Well, the short answer is that X's tool is more permissive than the other AI tools in terms of making misleading political images. The nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate did a study in March with other tools, including DALL-E and Midjourney. They found that those tools refused to produce misleading images at least a third of the time out of the 40 proms they used. I ran the same 40 prompts through X's chat bot today and only got rejected twice. Other researchers have had similar findings.

SHAPIRO: Well, what kinds of images did those 40 prompts create?

JINGNAN: Images that could mislead voters in the lead-up of the election, people appearing to be stuffing, stealing and smashing ballot boxes. I was also able to make images that appear to depict presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, them holding guns, getting arrested and sitting in jail. Whenever I asked it to depict the current U.S. president, it shows someone who really looks like Trump.

SHAPIRO: Are the fake images of Trump and Harris good enough to fool people into thinking these might be real photos?

JINGNAN: They're pretty good but not perfect. Its rendering of Harris doesn't always look like her, and the text in the images tend to be garbled. But these tools have improved over a short period of time, and it's becoming harder to spot the fakes. And what this tool can do has people who are trying to maintain confidence in elections worried.

SHAPIRO: Yeah, I can imagine. Tell us more about their worries.

JINGNAN: In particular, they're worried about how this could be used by bad faith actors who want to claim the election was stolen. That garbled text could be cleaned up, and then the images could be used as, quote, "photo evidence," unquote, of election fraud. Here's how Eddie Perez put it. He used to work at X and now focuses on public confidence in elections at nonpartisan nonprofit OSET Institute.

EDDIE PEREZ: I'm very uncomfortable with the fact that technology that is this powerful, that appears this untested, that has this few guard rails on it is just being dropped into the hands of the public at such an important time.

JINGNAN: All the companies have policies that forbid users from using the images to purport to depict reality, but X's tool seems to allow users by and large to make them anyway. I tried asking both X and the company who made the image generator if they have any more enforcement mechanisms, but they have so far not responded to my request for comment.

SHAPIRO: So does that mean that, as of right now, people using this tool on X can kind of just do whatever they want with it?

JINGNAN: No, X has some guard rails. You cannot generate some images, nudity, and interestingly, the Ku Klux Klan, but I could depict other extremist groups like the Nazis, the Proud Boys and members of the Islamic State. It also seems that rules are changing on the fly. Last Thursday, I could generate images that show various people holding guns, on Friday, I couldn't, but today, I can again. In this, like, volatile political environment, this image generator looks like it can be something of a wild card.

SHAPIRO: That's NPR's Huo Jingnan. Thank you for your reporting.

JINGNAN: Thank you.

Copyright © 2024 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.