Lark Benobi's Reviews > Piercing
Piercing
by
by
I was intrigued and then all at once I was bored. The dissociative out-of-body feeling that both of the main characters experience was also a trait used by Murakami in My Annihilation to explain the main character’s ability to endure or inflict pain so it felt repetitive and like a crutch or placeholder rather than a useful explanation of each character’s violent urges. Also both protags had horrific childhoods, full of abuse, and for once I’d love to read a splashy thriller where the protagonist was just a regular joe with a happy home life as a child. The tension dropped for me considerably after the baby was no longer in the picture as the likeliest next ice pick victim and I’m left to ponder why I felt more upset about the bunny’s fate than any human character’s fate. It’s my 4th Murakami book so I guess he’s doing something that interests me. I think it’s these novels’ straightforward simplicity, a recurring strength in all the books I’ve read, as well as what I perceive as the author’s complete willingness to write implausibly if it’s the fastest way to serve his purpose. I admire that.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Piercing.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
emily
(new)
Jun 16, 2024 02:28PM
The concluding line of your review made me laugh, Claire :') . I've done a few R. Murakami, but I don't think I can do any more (at least not anytime soon), He just sounds so annoying , to me (tone-wise). But his work always leaves a bit of crumbs to think about, and I respect that.
reply
|
flag
emily wrote: "But his work always leaves a bit of crumbs to think about, and I respect that...."
Yes, me too. Authors can't all be reaching all the time for the big cathartic revelation in their fiction, where is the fun in that? And there is something spritely in Ryu Murakami's storytelling, no matter how gross it gets.
Yes, me too. Authors can't all be reaching all the time for the big cathartic revelation in their fiction, where is the fun in that? And there is something spritely in Ryu Murakami's storytelling, no matter how gross it gets.
Lark wrote: "emily wrote: "But his work always leaves a bit of crumbs to think about, and I respect that...."
Yes, me too. Authors can't all be reaching all the time for the big cathartic revelation in their f..."
Precisely - he delivers 'disgust' with some (albeit mostly vague and muddled) substance, haha. I take back what I said about not wanting to read any more of his work - I have briefly forgotten about From the Fatherland, with Love . Allegedly his best/magnus opus, etc. - par-existential , par-political satire. Will have to read that at some point, an intimidatingly massive book though.
Yes, me too. Authors can't all be reaching all the time for the big cathartic revelation in their f..."
Precisely - he delivers 'disgust' with some (albeit mostly vague and muddled) substance, haha. I take back what I said about not wanting to read any more of his work - I have briefly forgotten about From the Fatherland, with Love . Allegedly his best/magnus opus, etc. - par-existential , par-political satire. Will have to read that at some point, an intimidatingly massive book though.