Really adorable, sweet, beautiful short chapter in the Maiden Lane series. Seeing all the heroines with their husbands and children was all kinds of cReally adorable, sweet, beautiful short chapter in the Maiden Lane series. Seeing all the heroines with their husbands and children was all kinds of cute. LOVE THIS ENSEMBLE CAST SO MUCH! The perfect epilogue (why didn't this go in the freaking book?!) to Duke of Midnight. 💖...more
What I loved Artemis: Her name suits her. She of the Warrior Goddess, who brings a stuffy arrogant Duke t3.75 stars
[image]
I'm conflicted on this one.
What I loved Artemis: Her name suits her. She of the Warrior Goddess, who brings a stuffy arrogant Duke to his knees and doesn't bend to his will or is reduced to begging. Go girl!
Phoebe: I can't tell you how much I adore this character and want all things wonderful, beautiful and good to happen to her. She's so adorably charming. I loved her genuine friendship with Artemis and this girl's whit is hysterically sharp and so on point. Please don’t lose it! 🙏
Apollo: This character broke my heart so much. I adore his relationship and close bond with Artemis. These two are so wonderful together, their deep connection is so sweet and beautiful. You can tell how much these two have suffered but even so they try to make the most of even dire times and try to playfully tease each other. I found that so sweet and heartbreaking. The scenes with Artemis visiting him in Bedlam nearly broke me. I generally don’t like siblings used as a source of contention between the hero and heroine but here…..I got it. I understood. Also didn’t hurt that I had a huge soft spot for Apollo already.
The sex scenes: Yup I like them hot. 😜 Sue me! What can I say I’m a sucker for raw, sensual, carnal love scenes. And as always, Hoyt really delivers there.☺️ And yes I warmed up to Maximus’s nickname for Artemis too, I found it weird at first but near the end I found it endearing and sweet. Hoyt never holds anything back with the intimacy with her couples and I absolutely love that. She comes up with something new and special for each couple which I find really refreshing and original.
The rescue scene: Yes cliche as far as HR scenarios go but seeing Maximus frantic and nearly lose his shit was such a satisfying culmination for this reader. Yessss sir, claim the woman you love and f*ck Dukely expectations. 👏
What I was iffy on: The chemistry: This is so strange but I’m still not *entirely* sold on the chemistry between Maximus and Artemis. I saw it in some parts and in others I kinda struggled with it. I’m not sure if that even makes sense but it’s part of why I’m struggling to rate this. I thought the transition from wary antagonistic strangers to lusting lovers was a little clumsy, rushed and half-approached. I felt like Hoyt missed a step between them. I loved the idea of these two, and in the bedroom they were fire but outside of it?...... [image] I guess a big part of that was probably the blackmail angle used here to get Maximus to help Artemis. I didn’t like it. It left me feeling a little disappointed and underwhelmed because I wanted another way for these two to come together. It just felt very cold and a tad convoluted. And I certainly would have liked for Artemis to address that awkward scene from the prior book when she overheard him talking about her in a dismissively cold way (which again speaks on the hurried progress of their relationship in here).
The villain: Boo. Hiss. Another dud. 👎 I’m sorry Elizabeth Hoyt but 'Old Scratch' is as musty and corny as his name. I mean….really? Old Scratch? Sounds like a cologne fragrance ad. [image] And WTF is a “highwayman” doing robbing people in the slums of St. Giles?? That made no freaking sense.
The mystery plot: I found the whole murderer/emerald necklace arc the most farfetched thing out of the entire story. I initially thought the tie in with the emerald necklace Artemis owns was interesting and smart but as the story progressed, the nuts and bolts came together in a sloppy contrived mess that didn’t quite fit. You are honestly expecting me to believe a man spent nearly 20 years hunting a random killer who killed his parents and tracking down every. single. emerald. stone. from his mother’s necklace that was stolen from her the night she was murdered? Seriously? [image] That’s quite a skill. And logistically impossible unless the author wants us to suspend all belief and think no other necklace in all of London has the same stone and setting as the Wakefield jewels. I just found it so ludicrous imagining stoic Maximus--the Duke of Wakefield--recognizing emerald stones on people's necks all around London. lol Get real. You're telling me there aren’t any other tear drop emerald stones in all of London the same size and shape? [image]
Ghost of St. Giles: Can this dude retire? I'm over it. This persona has been run through the ground already and I see no point in ever bringing it back after this (I already know I'm wrong on that one). This has been played out too much and frankly 3 books back to back where the heroes are the Ghost is more than enough. I'm sick of this duality and it adds no suspense or climax to the stories whatsoever IMO. Which just proves it's a dud and unnecessary. PS: I also wasn't crazy about the reasoning why Maximus took on the role of the Ghost. The whole Bruce-Wayne-of-Historical-times approach I didn't find entirely convincing (appreciated the attempt though). Nor the reasons behind why he did it. It felt so cliche and a little gimmicky....more
Why such a creature of light and love and life should have come to him, he could not fathom. But he was grateful. Very grat
4.75 stars [image]
Why such a creature of light and love and life should have come to him, he could not fathom. But he was grateful. Very grateful.
Absolutely adored this. And that's the biggest surprise for me. I went into this one somewhat apprehensive given the fact how these two came together under forced awkward circumstances. And on top of that they both are grieving over a dead spouse/dead lover. That could have been a recipe for disaster. But this….this was beautiful. [image]
His Achilles' heel, the one person who had reached deep down inside him and grasped his heart, squeezing until it started beating again. She'd brought him back to life.
Megs was such a wonderful delight. I thought she was exactly what Godric needed. Her endless capacity for love, laughter, wit and patience was just so endearing and lovable. And I loved how honest and conscious she was of Godric's feelings through everything. It's this kind of character quality that is hard to find. That sense of guileless honesty and faith I found so refreshing and delicious and perfect contrast to Godric's quiet world-weary reserve.
"Godric," she whispered, and held out her hand to him. He took her hand, spreading her fingers and kissing each one.
[image]
Megs looked up at his entrance, her face shining. For a moment he caught his breath--it was almost like a light radiated from within her, and he was very glad that she'd apparently decided not to hold their argument against him. "Oh, Godric, come see! Her Grace has had her puppies." And she held the ratlike thing--which, apparently, was a pug puppy--like a peace offering. Godric raised his brows, sinking into a chair. “It’s quite….lovely.” “Oh, pooh!” She retracted her arms, cuddling the tiny creature against her cheek. “Don’t listen to Mr. St. John,” she whispered to the puppy as if in confidence. “You’re the most adorable thing I’ve ever seen!”
[image]
Godric took some warming up to. At first I found him too stiff and closed off, but once Hoyt peeled back every rough layer of this character, his heart, his loneliness, his quiet yearning, his goodness came through. The slow build up of this character and showing his wounds and raw grief was really great to see, heartbreaking yet relatable. I fell in love with him the minute he pulled out Megs’s letters that he kept locked in a dresser drawer and hungrily poured over them to help ground him. I really loved how willingly and open he was to help Megs, his selflessness was truly admirable. And seeing him helplessly fall for her was really a treat.
[image]
PS: Did you try the ginger, barely, and aniseed tisane recipe I sent you? I know it sounds quite revolting, but it will help your sore throat, truly!
Her postscript blurred before his eyes and he blinked hard, inhaling. This was who he'd done it for. Megs, who thought old crotchety butlers had any sense of humor, who ate bitter persimmon tarts to please the local vicar's wife, and who cried at the sight of a baby and couldn't admit even to herself why. She deserved a baby of her own. She'd make a magnificent mother: kind, gentle, understanding.
Gah! I found them so adorable and heartbreaking. It also didn't hurt that this used one of my favorite tropes, a marriage of convenience. Seeing this couple slowly unhurriedly fall for each other was like sitting in the sun and taking in blue skies and a warm breeze. These are two people who carry a lot of hurt and angst but deal with it differently. Godric shutting himself off to the outside world and life and burying himself in his Ghost of St. Giles work, Megs looking for ways to make others happy and finding pleasure in the smallest things. And I found that dying apple tree a great analogy and symbol of what Megs stands for. And it was such a great depiction of what this character represented and did to the hero, how her ‘magic’ transformed Godric and brought him back to life. [image] Hoyt's really masters at writing smart characters with a sharp focus on all the human senses. That element makes her characters so human and the world building so layered. Her conscious smart layered writing reminds me a lot of Lisa Kleypas.
Phoebe turned her face, leaning close to discreetly inhale. "Artemis?" "Yes." Artemis felt quite proud. She'd taken to wearing the same scent--lemons and bay leaf--when she realized that Lady Phoebe sometimes used smell to identify people. She suspected that the other woman could see very little at all when the light was dim--such as tonight at the theater.
Just brilliant.
Now there were a few things I do wish were handled differently. The 'avenging' Roger's death arc for one, I felt that took up a little too much time in the last quarter of the book and took focus off Godric but Hoyt made up for it with that beautiful emotional declaration from Megs (emotional declarations are a weakness of mine). Second, not going to lie but my interest is already waning really thin with the whole Ghost of St. Giles character. The thrill and mystery for me is completely gone in that area. (view spoiler)[And 3 books back to back where the hero is the Ghost is a little much IMO. Just saying. (hide spoiler)] I wish (and hoping) Hoyt moves away from it because I don't think it really adds anything to the story and couples IMO. And also I’m not super crazy about the villain plots. I said it in Winter's book and same thing here the whole Lassie snatchers arc just didn't do anything for me. I kept finding my eyes glossing over those scenes and wanting Godric to hurry back to Megs. Lastly, and this is really minor, was how the epilogue was used as a story set up for the next book which is a personal pet peeve of mine. That's not an epilogue, but more of a sneak preview excerpt. I just find it so wasteful and a totally missed opportunity to expand and frame how the couple of the book are fairing 'down the road' after their HEA. Yes it was touched on in the last chapter before the epilogue which honestly was really nice but please don't label a chapter an 'epilogue' when it literally has nothing to do with the featured couple. It drives me batty when authors do this.
As for secondary characters, I'm already very intrigued and heartbroken for Artemis Greaves. This mysterious character is already showing such weight and intelligence. And I’m dying to know more about Apollo. I am a little unsure about stoic stiff lipped Dukely Maximus being paired up with Artemis. He's not very likable right now but I hope he wins me over like Godric did. Looking forward to seeing what happens there....more
Not what I was hoping it would be and fell short next to Book 1. This was lacking that punch and I had some problems with it overaReview up! 2.75 stars
Not what I was hoping it would be and fell short next to Book 1. This was lacking that punch and I had some problems with it overall. I knew I was in trouble from the start when I found out our heroine is engaged to the hero's older brother who everyone and their mother puts on such a high pedestal while completely disregarding the fact that he's an unmitigated asshole his own brother dislikes him. Red Flag #1 right there. I generally don't mind love triangles, in fact if handled well it can make for brilliant angst. But here.....it played out exactly as I feared and just managed to create silly incoherent forced angst for our leads. It just made for a frustrating read overall.
I liked Griffin enough. He's very rough around the edges, coarse, blunt, irreverent and funny. He's the black sheep of his family and the ton. The ton whom either humor him and love him no matter what, or treat him like a bug underneath their polished shoe and the butt of their petty jokes *side eyes Thomas*. Lady Hero on the other hand ( you are killing me with these ridiculous names Hoyt! >.<) is perfect, polished, poised and everything Griffin is not.
The set up here initially was very interesting and I was hooked. That and Hoyt's brilliant talent of weaving beautiful prose and witty dialogue didn't hurt either. But even so, things just ended up lagging, falling short and not as exciting or gritty as the first book. And the whole side plot about the gin distillery business Griffin runs while a nice attempt at conflict, I found rather dull, tiring and uninteresting.
But what really didn't work for me? The long drawn-out insufferable engagement. The title of Jackhole of the Century™ in this book goes to Thomas Reading. The asshole fiance and Griffin's older brother who gets more absolution than he’s worth IMO.
[image]
I knew he was trouble before he even opened his mouth. He’s a stuffy disdainful prejudiced snob who for some reason gets a POV and a HEA to boot too at the end (WTF for??). From his constant stiff lipped sneering, petty childish jabs to his brother, extremely sexist chauvinistic remarks to chasing after his ex-mistress while engaged (but oh yes let's forgive him shall we?), and yet we have our heroine Hero oblivious to it and constantly defending his pristine character. To his own brother. RME. Right, ok. And this was all before ‘the incident' that is so infuriating your urge to throw this book out the window is severely tested. But I’ll get to that in a minute.
The other issue I had? The heroine, Lady Hero. I found her all over the place and so underwhelming. She’s exactly what you would expect on paper and I was waiting for her to break out of that mold of privileged darling. But she never did. Instead I found her wishy washy, prissy, sanctimonious, judgmental, cowardly, and lukewarm. Which surprised me since she seemed so jovial and refreshing with the cameo she made in Temprence’s book. Which I have to say, for a heroine named "Hero" I found her to be pretty spineless and weak. Go figure. Her inner struggle and guilt over her own tarnished image of perfection was just too much for me. She's endlessly internalizing and hand wringing over losing her crowned status because she's lusting after her fiance's shameless degenerate brother. It went on for too long. While the guilt is understandable, what bothered me was the fact that she seemed to care more about her image and what the ton thought of her rather than what's right in front of her nose and following her heart. Yes you’re the sister of a Duke, yes you were raised to be a cut above others with high expectations but seriously you are THAT hung up over society possibly no longer viewing you as perfect and being distraught over your own disillusionment of self-perfection??.....Wow. [image]
Moral of the story here: [image] The whole source of tension and conflict between the h/hr was so floundering and inconsistent and didn't really speak volumes about Hero's character. Her laundry list of reasons for why she couldn't be with Griffin are inconsistent and ever-changing. She can’t be with Griffin because they aren’t compatible, her brother won’t allow it, he’s a Gin distiller, he’s a rake, she doesn’t love him, he’s not stable or safe. Every time Griffin confronted her over this, she had a new excuse pulled out. She kept pushing him away for reasons that were weak at best and cowardly at worst. Griffin is a wild card to you but stuffy abusive chauvinistic Thomas is the better choice? [image] I mean the red flags that kept popping up about dear Thomas seemed to not phase her through 90% of the story which made everything so frustrating and unfulfilling. For fuck’s sake, she finds out her perfect paragon of a fiance sat on his ass while his younger brother had to do the grunt dirty work to come up with funds to support the ducal family and it didn't seem to phase her much. [image] Girl….red alert. RED ALERT. And you wanna chide Griffin for selling gin because it’s a sin??? Please shut up. Please.
But then, oh then it gets even more ridiculous. And here is the big *incident* that makes you want to set fire to the whole damn book. You would think the final strike against this miserable merry-go-round would be Thomas's reaction to Hero confessing about her affair with Griffin. Right? Right?....Wrong. Thomas hits her--to the point she's thrown to the ground--and calls her a whore. But guess what? She still decides to go through with the engagement. And why? Because her brother made the match and she agrees with his choice and Thomas is the "safer more reliable choice" over Griffin. [image] And cue my step off this ride right here. She seemed to easily forgive Thomas for what he did because "he was hurt"--who FYI gave her a fucking diamond emerald necklace as an apology in the end (if that doesn't say enough)--but was constantly crucifying Griff for how he lives his life and the choices he makes and thinking he wasn't good enough. I mean...really? I just gave up caring for any kind of redeemable HEA after this scene, with a heroine this weak, spineless and selfish it just lost all my interest.
So yeah, not a winner for me. Here's to hoping Winter's book is better....more
Amazing! Stupendous! Brilliant! Can I have some more? Can I do it again please?? [image]
Honestly, I don't know why it took m*5 SHINING STARS!!!* [image]
Amazing! Stupendous! Brilliant! Can I have some more? Can I do it again please?? [image]
Honestly, I don't know why it took me so long to dive into this series. I had only read Silence's book (Book 3) a while back and it didn't blow me away but Duke of Sin caught my eye so I thought I may as well give this series another go. But this...this was just magical. The gritty backdrop and dark tone with the Jack the Ripper-esq murder mystery really added nicely to the Georgian era of lower class slum living London. I just really couldn't put this down because of that. The world building and detail is exceptionally on point and so good. Even the murder mystery is gripping because it's so grizzly and realistic. I appreciated that Hoyt held nothing back there. Made for a much more raw, realistic honest read. As for the leads..... *sigh* what can I say?
“You’re an impossibly rude man, without morals or even manners, as far as I can see.” “Oh, stop, I beg you, Mrs. Dews.” Lord Caire grunted. “You’ll turn my head with this flattery.”
“What do you want of me?” she whispered. “Everything.” His mouth was on hers. Hot, insistent, working as if he meant to draw from her bodily what he couldn’t in words. She gripped his arms, unable to defend herself from this onslaught so soon after the ecstasy of the music....
Two vulnerable, lonely, closed off hearts, battling their own demons who come together so naturally without restraint. I don't know who surprised me more in this, straight-laced proper widow Temperance Dews or domineering cynical brutally sharp-tongued Lazarus Huntington. I didn't think Lazarus's whole long silver haired look would work for me, I kept thinking Lucius Malfoy but without the permanent sneer. But Lazarus made it work. Boy did it work for him.
[image]
“Why?” she asked urgently. “Why did you make me watch? Why me?” “Because,” he murmured, “you draw me. Because you are kind but not soft. Because when you touch me, the pain is bittersweet. Because you cradle a desperate secret to your bosom, like a viper in your arms, and don’t let go of it even as it gnaws upon your very flesh. I want to pry that viper from your arms. To suckle upon your torn and bloody flesh. To take your pain within myself and make it mine.” She trembled beside him; he could feel the quivers through the arm she kept on him. “I have no secret.” He bent and whispered against her hair, “Sweet, darling liar.”
Hoyt's handling of prose and way with words in this is so beautiful and layered. I kept finding myself re-reading passages simply because I enjoyed the delivery of lines and turn of phrase. Her descriptive imagery is so clear and lyrically smart. I don't remember it being this good in her Legend of the Four Soldiers series which was a total bust for me.
It was a strange thing, this feeling of empathy. He’d never experienced it before. He realized that what hurt this woman hurt him as well, that what made her bleed caused a hemorrhage of pain within his soul.
[image]
He moved like a wave pounding against a beach, like the wind flying across the cobblestones, like a man on a woman. It was the oldest, most common movement in history, and at the same time it was new and pure.
He stepped around a near-skeletal man, passed out or perhaps dead in the street. He was nearing St. Giles. The street was becoming narrower, more filthy and wretched. The channel in the middle of the street was clogged with noxious debris, the stench a miasma that seemed to cling to the skin.
[image]
The rain was gentle at first. It drifted down, as soft as a mother’s kiss on a sleeping child.
And I really have to say I’m most impressed and applaud the direction Hoyt took her heroine here. All my (6 lol!) years of reading and piles of historical romance books I’ve read, I have yet to come across a heroine like Temperance. A woman who enjoys passion and sexual intimacy but is embarrassed by it and tries in vain to tamp it down and live a good clean life because of a mistake she made. On paper that sounds so derivative and hysterically cliche but it wasn’t here. She’s so much more complex and human then that that it honestly blew me away. I was waiting for her secret to be an overblown overused HR trope of being cheated on, abandoned, her husband not being able to get it up given all the subtle internalized angsting and hand wringing but no. It’s something much more bold, realistic and unforgivingly honest IMO. (view spoiler)[She slept with another man while she was married to her husband. Happened only once. (hide spoiler)]
Let me be clear, Hoyt doesn’t try to make Temperance into something she’s not, not a revolutionary ‘modern’ heroine of her time who craves sex all the time, no excuses or justifications are made for her mistake, no ‘he deceived me!’ arguments. And I think that honestly saved this from becoming a martyr crusade of 20 ways she needs to repent and the hero can show her the right ways to have sex. Nope. This was about a woman who is warm blooded and enjoys sex and learning to accept that and forgive herself. I found that so damn genuine, real and refreshing. FINALLY someone who gets it! Someone who knows how to approach the subject of sex and women in the historical era in a believable and vulnerable way.
This was who she was, whether she liked it or not, a woman who wanted and needed sex. Who loved sex.
[image] Seeing her blossom and take ownership of her own desires and so honestly with a man who wouldn’t judge her and yes even calling her out on her martyr tendencies was a wonderful payoff. I was cheering her on. Yessss. Go girl! Own it!
The *only* thing I do wish was a little more fulfilling was the reveal of the St. Giles killer. That to me was a little too predictable (and obvious) and I found the killer’s motives to be too thin & all over the place. There’s killing women in a fit of rage, a fit of using them as an example and then there’s doing it as a show of scaring off competing business (which I found really hard to swallow) using both reasons just didn’t jive for me and didn’t connect well. But overall, loved it! Can’t wait to dive into the rest of this series! :D...more
First of all, I love Asa. Love him. I loved him from the start. With his short temper, acerbi*Review Up!*
I have mixed feelings about this one. [image]
First of all, I love Asa. Love him. I loved him from the start. With his short temper, acerbic tongue, how frivolous, blunt, messy, brash, irreverent and honest he is. He is perfect example of what Elizabeth Hoyt truly excels at. Each of her characters are so distinct, dimensional and fully fleshed out. They each have their own unique flaws, quirks and issues they need to deal with and sort out. She’s one of the few HR who does it so consistently. This is Book 9 and so far not one character can be mistaken for another. Not a one. That includes all the supporting secondary characters too. Every single character is so meticulously fleshed out down to the fine lines on their face, the shape of their teeth, wrinkles on their clothes and buckles on their shoes and how they talk. That’s an amazing feat of it’s own. I fucking relish it and eat it up.
Like please…..give. me. more. [image]
Asa’s crassness, love for life and bluntness reminded me of Griffin, but multiply that x 10. 😂 He’s loud and unapologetic in everything he does. And the fact that he took such care in making skittery Eve comfortable and trying his damn hardest to be patient with her--which goes entirely against his nature--showed he’s a keeper.
Now what I struggled with: Eve Dinwoody. She’s definitely a package of contradictions just like Hoyt promises in the book. But I struggled with it. Her conflicting angles didn’t mesh well for me. Some aspects of her character I ended up liking. Others? Just confused me. Here is where I confess I generally don’t like prim starched uptight characters. I’ve tried time and time again and 99.9% of the time these kind of characters are as tight laced and uninteresting as they appear on the surface. I call them buzzkillers for a reason. When you have engaging characters and that one pinched mouth stick-in-the-mud character that’s shooting death glares in the corner? It just completely kills the mood. They stand out like sore thumbs. BUT that being said, thankfully Eve wasn't a stick in the mud. I didn't not like her. I just struggled to connect with her all the way. I didn't hate her as I thought I would, I just thought she was ok. The moments I found her most endearing and she shined the most was her hesitant friendship/bonding with her pet dove named Dove and Henry the dog. I found her bond with Henry so endearing and sweet given her fear of dogs. I love how Hoyt always manages to incorporate animals into each of her books in such unique varying ways. It's incredibly charming. As a big animal lover myself I love how natural it comes off and the animals somehow always serve a meaningful purpose to the story and characters.
Another thing I struggled with and probably my biggest hang up overall with this book was the heroine's horrific backstory. I found Eve's trauma a little inconsistent and kinda hamfisted to be quite honest. Some of the details to her traumatic episode as a child were a little off for me. The author builds up this character's mysterious past and why she has such severe PTSD through out the book so you kind of pick up what is going on but don't get the full story till the big reveal near the end. And the hints given painted a very ominous picture. But I just wasn't feeling it once the truth of what happened finally came out. I mean everything was explained away neatly but I was side-eyeing certain parts of that whole scenario. The pieces to the puzzle seemed an odd fit. (view spoiler)[ Masked men letting hunting dogs loose on women and children at a house party for sport and revelry. Ok...but why? I know, I know. Villain motivations don't always need to make clear sense but something wasn't clicking for me here. I couldn't put my finger on it. It just felt very forced and random. And Eve's brother just happening to pop up out of nowhere right in the nick of time to save little Eve from getting raped?? <__< ..........Shmo'kay. His convenient appearance better be explained in the next book. Just saying. (hide spoiler)] Because of this Eve has been terrified of dogs and scared of men her whole life, which is why she has her own bodyguard since she was a teenager. :/ Eh....ok.
Oh and the tattoos. Can't forget those. The big bad villain in here is part of a secret "Order" who call themselves "The Lords of Chaos", one of whom happened to be Eve and Val's father. The bad dudes get together every Spring and do all kinds of unscrupulous vile things while wearing masks. And all the members have tattoos.
A dolphin tattoo.
[image]
Really? [image] Yes because a dolphin is the first animal that comes to mind when you think of immoral sociopaths who like to rape women and children for sport. In a Historical Georgian era book. *crickets* WTF Hoyt? This is where this author always stumbles. Villains are not Mrs. Hoyt's strongest skill. Especially how easily and extremely quickly they are foiled at the end of every book. This Lords of Chaos arc would be another example of that.
My next gripe: Bridget Crumb and the never-ending blackmail letters saga. [image] Ugh. Listen, I’m upset. Cause a. I was expecting to love the very popular, rogue, anti-hero character Valentine Napier and I don’t. And b. His heroine the author chose to pair him up with in the next book (Bridget) is as interesting and exciting as dried paint. A secretive, tight-laced housemaid whose biggest concern is how many times the silverware needs to be polished. Oh...goody. [image] Really? Y’all I’m not getting the warm fuzzies here. At all. She better be hiding more than that grey streak of hair under that hair cap of hers. Just sayin. The irony isn’t lost on me that Val is the reason I started this series because his story intrigued me and out of all the characters, I end up being underwhelmed by him the most. Aheh. :( Talk about Plot Twist.
And yeah in regards to Val like I said I’m still not feeling anything for this guy. [image] I could literally not give 2 fucks about this dude right now. Everything about him so far is extremely gimmicky & so stereotypical. Like....where is the rest? What's the damn catch? There is nothing mysterious about him or his fucking blackmail letters that seemed to make everyone and their dogs and babies shake in fear. Instead of being intrigued and wanting to find out more, I keep having to fight the urge to roll my eyes whenever he shows up. Here it was even more so. And he wasn’t even in the dang book! I'm sorry but a grown ass man going around town blackmailing people for fun and collecting their secrets as weapons…..seriously??? [image]
That's it?
I’m not shaking over this. Is he the Regina George of historical times? Pick a better hobby dude. Everything about him is a bad cliche. From his lame amusement of mind games to his naked self-portrait hanging in his bedour where it's sole purpose is to show readers he’s well endowed. Oh my! (😒) To his "clever" witty parting shots that seem too rehearsed. To his fallen angel looks. Etc., etc., etc... [image] I just….don’t get it. I’m going to read his book since I bought the damn thing but for now. Sorry, Val: [image]...more
Then he flung his arms wide and bellowed. "Away! Away, you pestilence, you flies, you midges of ruination! Get thee
2.75 stars
[image]
Then he flung his arms wide and bellowed. "Away! Away, you pestilence, you flies, you midges of ruination! Get thee back to the thy kitchens of destruction and G-d damn thy lips and thy words and thine eyes! Away, I say, and never come again! A plague and a flood of amphibians upon the lot of you!"
Didn't work for me. It’s not lost on me that Val's book is the reason why I initially started this series (that cover!) and yet it ended up being my least favorite. ...more
I enjoyed this one overall. Hoyt really has a deft hand at creating layered flawed characters who develop3.75 stars
Oh Apollo. He's so adorable. *sigh*
I enjoyed this one overall. Hoyt really has a deft hand at creating layered flawed characters who develop more overtime.
Highlights for me: -Apollo: Loved him before this, love him now. He's as patient, kind, gentle, sweet and smexy as I was hoping he would be. Darling giant indeed. His devotion to his sister Artemis is so endearing and his desperation and yearning to obtain a "normal" life after his horrific ordeal in Bedlam was tangible. I loved his passion for landscape architecture. I can't wait to see the final results of the new Harte Pleasure Gardens in the upcoming books. And I have to say I enjoyed reading about a hero who is labeled as "not handsome" with a knobby nose and craggy face. ...more
Beautiful story with interesting, flawed, complex leads.
This used a character/couple trope I'm generally not a big fan of and I guess it sli3.75 stars
Beautiful story with interesting, flawed, complex leads.
This used a character/couple trope I'm generally not a big fan of and I guess it slipped my mind before reading this since Winter is such a stoic mystery who carries himself so much older. The hero is 6 years younger than the heroine and a virgin to boot. The virgin part doesn't bother me, in fact it made for some really interesting compelling scenes between the h and hr who both are for the lack of a better term, straightforward. That blunt honesty between the both of them worked really well. It made the teasing, bantering and even arguing fun and refreshing. I already went into this somewhat bias, I already had a soft spot for Winter given how heartfelt he is with everything he does and carries so many burdens on his shoulders. So I tried to keep an open mind with the age difference. And I'm glad I did. Isabel and Winter were well matched and another great commentary on high class vs low class, which is the overall theme in this series. That theme adds enough conflict and tension between the couple and Hoyt explores it wonderfully.
"But you must be awash in a sea of compliments, my lady," Winter said. "Every gentleman you meet must voice his admiration, his wish to make love to you. And those are only the ones who may voice such thoughts. All about you are men who cannot speak their admiration, who must remain mute from lack of social standing or fear of offending you. Only their thoughts light the air about you, following you like a trail of perfume, heady but invisible."
I said this about Temperance's book and I have to say it again, Hoyt really masters at drawing realistic flawed characters with so much depth, honesty and rough edges. The self-awareness and limitations her characters show I find the most refreshing and so realistic. Nobody is perfect, we all have issues and make mistakes or sometimes carry misconceptions of others we aren't even aware of but try to do better. That human flaw is played out here wonderfully. Here it was with the quiet school master and orphanage manager Winter Makepeace (clever last name btw) who tries his hardest to save and protect orphaned children from the streets of St. Giles. He meets his match in Lady Isabel Beckinhall, she with the silver tongue, quick wit and vulnerable insecure heart. That vulnerability which is buried underneath layers of self-deprecating snark was brought to the surface by Winter, who doesn't let her hide.
And I have to say the sexiest love scene with a virgin hero in HR I think I’ve read to date was here. The experienced heroine showing the inexperienced hero how to pleasure her. Wowza. So simple and honest but sensual. Like I've said I generally don't like this kind of dynamic but here it was nicely played. I just adored how unbashful Winter was with his questions and pushing Isabel to tell him frankly what he should do. I found that surprisingly very sexy.
She bit her lip. “Could you….stroke?” “Like this?” She inhaled. “Softer.” “This?” She laughed, but the sound was frustrated. He was too high, hadn’t quite found the right place. Perhaps she should-- “Isabel,” he suddenly breathed in her ear. “I have all night. Surely by dawn I can learn this. Please show me.” Well, that was quite frank. And oddly, he didn’t sound as if his male pride was hurt. He merely sounded...curious.
I also enjoyed the continuation of other story arcs and seeing Temperance pop up in here wanting to spend time with Mary Whitsun, the eldest orphaned girl at the home. I found this very smart. This is another thing I love about Hoyt’s writing. Her consistency. The sense of realistic continuation even after a couple get their HEA, we still see glimpses of them dealing with daily life struggles and reality after their HEA. Hoyt brilliantly hammers home and reminds her readers that not everything is always sunshine and roses and there are still daily struggles. In this case being, Temperance loving an orphaned girl and wanting to spend more time with her even though she no longer lives at the orphanage and is married. It’s heartbreaking in a sense because she had to leave this girl behind. I really like the fact that Hoyt didn't take the easy way out or forced an issue to reach a convoluted HEA conclusion. Nor did she use the much abused and obnoxious orphan trope that I hate. The one where MCs take in orphan child simply to draw sympathy from readers while having no relevance to the story or characters--ugh. No. But that wasn't the case here. The relationship the adults have with these children is so honest and bittersweet. Just like Winter heartbreakingly makes Joseph Tinbox take the Naval commision he's offered by a peer, no matter how much he loves the boy, he knows it will benefit the child more in life. Not only is that selfless but it’s so realistic. This is honestly the one time I’ve enjoyed reading about an orphanage and the colorful kids running around and seeing Winter interact with them. And no I don’t hate kids in books, if written well they tug at your heart strings and tug at my strings it did. Little Christopher following around Isabel and vying for her attention made me want to curl up into a ball and smack her at the same time. The little boy's longing to be loved by the worldly Isabel was so heartbreaking and endearing. How these two slowly connected and end up clinging to each other was such a great payoff. I was so proud of Isabel.
I also have to give kudos and applaud Hoyt for her knack at historical research and political/social commentary. (view spoiler)[ Mentioning Jewish persecution in Europe at the time and Winter rescuing a Jewish orphaned girl no less was probably the most surprising/shocking aspect for me since Jewish characters are rarely if ever shown in HR stories, or romance in general. So I loved it. It gave this story and series so much more dimension. Brilliant. 👏 (hide spoiler)]
So why only 3½ stars? I felt I enjoyed the overall world building and supporting characters more than I did the couple. And I did really like Winter & Isabel but their romance didn't sweep me off my feet when compared to Temperance & Lazurus. I thought they worked well together but was waiting for that little something extra. I also felt the villain angle fell flat, the "lassie snatchers" played out very anticlimactic for me and the person behind it was kinda obvious. But still, great read and an improvement from Griff and Hero's story....more
Here is the third installment of the legend of the four soldiers series where we have Sir Alistair Munroe who was one of the remaining survivors of thHere is the third installment of the legend of the four soldiers series where we have Sir Alistair Munroe who was one of the remaining survivors of the Spinner Falls Massacre. He has hidden himself in his lonely neglected caste ever since his return from the Colonies, scarred inside and out. But once a mysterious woman shows up at his door claiming to be his new 'housekeeper' and the feelings, desires and emotions he's kept closed away for years begins to break through...
This was surprisingly better then I thought it would be. I was preparing myself for not getting much or getting the expected cliche set up and romance book h/hr, especially with the hero being physically scarred and the temper of a angry bear to boot. It does have the 'beauty and the beast' theme going on a bit but isn't over the top which I liked. Helen Fitzwilliam is running away with her children and in dire need of a safe place to hide from her childrens' father the Duke of Lister. Helen has been the Duke's mistress for over 14 years and has finally decided to take action and take her kids with her after the Duke's continuous neglect to her and the kids. She goes to Sir Alistair's castle in Scotland hoping to convince him of her charade as a housekeeper, sent by a good friend to help clean his dirty castle. That's when things start to get interesting...
I have a thing for wounded, scarred heroes who are hopeless, brooding and cynical. I'm a total sucker for it. I love it. And Sir Alistair is no exception. It wasn't over the top, or melodramatic but believable. Again I was expecting to get the cheesey cliche romance book hero who's scarred w/ an eye patch who hisses and stomps around going 'woe is me' but I was pleasantly surprised with what I got. Alistair is of course physically scarred from his capture by a tribe of Indians who tortured him, he lost his eye, two fingers and half his face is completely scarred. Because of that, he doesn't show his face in public and rarely leaves his castle. He lost all hope or reason for a happy future and isolates himself in his country home and barricades himself in his tower working twenty/four seven. But when things between him and Helen grow intense, you see that very vulnerable side of him come out, fearing that he is not good enough for her and is an ugly scarred revolting man. I couldn't help but really like him, love him actually. I believed him and his struggles. Hoyt didn't over do it and made a real character who you couldn't help but sympathize with and want so bad for him to find real love, someone who would soothe him and take care of him and accept him for him. And Helen did just that, she made him laugh again and want a future with her.
Helen I will be honest, at first introduction, I was a bit put off by her. She was introduced in the previous book when Lady Vale befriends her in the park with her children. As beautiful as she is, she came off so passive aggressive and a little dim witted. Staying with a man who continuously berates and insults her I just couldn't wrap my head around. And I say dim witted because when she shares this w/ Lady Vale, Melisande is the one who points out the abuse, Helen just seemed so oblivious to it.
And I tried really hard not to judge but I found myself agreeing w/ some of Alistair's harsh words when he discovers the truth about her. How she continued to stay with a married man and bare not one, but TWO children by him was just 'whaaat?' for me. Given the time setting and society, kids sired out of wedlock have slim chance of having a normal life, they would be social outcasts that no one would accept. I thought it was incredibly selfish of her to do that.
Moral of this story folks: [image] Just don't do it. Period.
I understand she was a young naive girl and seduced by an older man, but to get involved with a man who is married and much older than her (ew) made me want to shake her and go 'what were you thinking!'. It was suspending total belief to swallow the idea of a young 17 year old girl falling for an aging balding stiff uptight Duke. I don't buy for a second how anything about that man was considered romantic to her naive eye, other than being a lecher and creep. *shuddering* But she seemed to learn a lot and grow up more while staying with Alistair and she seemed to berate herself enough for her past mistakes. I sympathized with her and understood her and really liked how she also learned more about her children. In the beginning of the book is was made clear that she didn't really know her kids as well as she ought to, living in a luxurious townhouse she left them with a nanny (which also bugged me) so during their journey to Scotland and everything following that Helen grows so much closer and gets to know her kids, Abigail in particular.
I really loved the relationship between the kids and Alistair. It was really sweet and a nice surprise how he took on the protective role over them and taught them things. Plus his romantic, tender affectionate side really surprised me as well when he and Helen made love. I loved seeing that sweet playful charming side come out, it not only surprised Helen but me as well. lol I like those moments that take you completely by surprise it makes the book much more enjoyable. I really liked this, I thought it was much more fun and passionate I must say (steamy love scenes ;P) then the previous book. The characters and the romance in this I found more believable. Great story....more
This was in-between for me. Not bad, not great. It just fell completely flat for me. First Elizabeth Hoyt book I've read, while I ended up 2.5/3 stars
This was in-between for me. Not bad, not great. It just fell completely flat for me. First Elizabeth Hoyt book I've read, while I ended up liking it, I struggled w/ this particular story. It took me awhile to get to even 'liking' it to be honest. I wasn't blown away and the characters took a while to grow on me. I was half way into the book and found myself not caring for either the hero or heroine...not a good a sign. I was told by several that this series was best read in order or else I would be lost. The only two that caught my interest were this one and TBAB simply because of the blurb on the back of the book. I know there is a mystery plot that weaves throughout the four books, but I'm more interested in the couple's stories. As for this couple's story, let's just say, not what I was expecting to get.
Lady Melisande Fleming has been in love with Lord Vale for years and when he's left at the alter unexpectedly, Melisande jumps at the chance and offers to be his bride. The issue I had right from the start and made this story drag out forever for me was the heroine's stand point of refusing to let Jasper know about her true feelings and not letting him in when he would try to woo her. She wanted him for herself but REFUSED to let him know anything about her true feelings and didn't want to open up her heart. That made absolutely no sense to me. I just couldn’t understand the whole point of her being brave enough to propose marriage to him only to turn around and act stiff and reserved around him, fearing he would find out her true feelings. It defeats the whole purpose of getting married if you ask me. You've wanted him, you got him yet you don't want to love again? Huh? She found love once before and was burned badly by it and doesn’t want to go through that again, understandable but why put yourself out there again, marry the man of your dreams, the man you love but not want to give anything in return or open up to him? It was very frustrating to say the least. I also found it selfish as hell, to offer the man you love marriage only to box him in a loveless marriage all because you don't want to put your heart on the line. Plus her standoffish and brittle and sometimes impatient attitude towards him did not endear me to her. It was emphasized more than once that she's secretly loved this man for years yet her behavior around him left me completely baffled. He would ask her questions about herself and she would instantly be suspicious and on guard and ask him why. It drove me nuts everytime she would put up a wall and snap at him 'you don't know me'... yeah? well if you tried talking to him then maybe he would know you. RME.
I just really have no patience for brittle uptight heroines who go out of their way to make things more difficult not only for themselves but the hero as well. It's nonsensical and to be blunt...idiotic.
As for the plot, I wanted more. I felt it was one of those books where it fell into the tedious pattern of depicting the married couple's life day by day where nothing really happens except the constant 180 turns w/ Melisande or Jasper clamming up and avoiding one another. It was like the two lived completely separate lives. I found it incredibly bizarre how he would go out at evenings to balls and gatherings and not even bother to ask her to accompany him. Um huh?? Of course she's not a social butterfly and hates going out but I felt he could have compromised. Same goes for her. I just did not get that connection or chemistry between the two. It was very frustrating because I felt some of the characters' motivations weren't explained or didn't make sense. I also thought the dialogue/grammar was a little weird at times but I guess it's more because I'm new to Hoyt's writing style maybe??
That being said, things started to pick up in the second half of the book, I grew to like and understand both characters more and see the affection and secrete love grow stronger I just really wish Hoyt emphasized this more through the book and did something more with it. I really liked the last chapter wished I got more of that through the book. lol I also felt Jasper's PTSD from the his soldiering days could have been pushed more. We saw him talking about it, thinking about it but he covered a lot of it up with a jolly humorous facade who'd like to laugh and have fun. Yes, he finally opened up to Melisande about it and it played into the mystery plot of who betrayed his regiment during the Spinner's Falls massacre, but I wanted more, was expecting more.
I also thought the little side-love story between Melisande's maid Sally and Jasper's valet Mr. Pynch was really sweet and endearing. The little snippets of them was very cute and made me actually want more of them. They made such a surprise pairing, complete polar opposites, I love stories like that. All in all, it was good her writing style takes some getting used to though. It didn't really motivate me to read her other books but I'm gonna give her another try. I just really hope the next one is better than this. *crosses fingers*...more