What do you think?
Rate this book
416 pages, Hardcover
First published March 1, 2011
the first day he [Pallister] reported to duty [as a staffer for Alaska’s Republican senator Frank Murkowski] …Murkowski assigned him the task of rifling through the Endangered Species Act for loopholes.There are those who contend that Chris’s efforts do nothing to solve the problem, that cleaning up the extant mess only gives cover to those who are responsible for it, and drains available resources from better targeted efforts. Hohn sails with marine scientists and checks out a Pacific location known as the Great Garbage Patch. It turns out there is an explanation for why flotsam collects in certain places, and one may conjure images of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot. He sails on a Canadian Ice Breaker, visits far-north native communities, visits the factory where the floaters were born, even checks in with the child psychology professionals who had a hand in the toys’ design.
“Every powerful icon invites both idolatry and iconoclasm, and in the bestiary of American childhood, there is now no creature more iconic than the rubber duck.”
Exhibit A: actual earrings I was gifted for my 40th birthday:
Exhibit B: a representative photo of my bathroom:
“Let’s draw a bath. Let’s set a rubber duck afloat. Look at it wobbling there. What misanthrope, what damp, drizzly November of a sourpuss, upon beholding a rubber duck afloat, does not feel a Crayola ray of sunshine brightening his gloomy heart? Graphically, the rubber duck’s closest relative is not a bird or a toy but the yellow happy face of Wal-Mart commercials.”
Exhibit C: another representative shot of my bathroom. Hmm, maybe I have a duck problem…
“Spot a yellow duck dropped atop the seaweed at the tide line, ask yourself where it came from, and the next thing you know you’re way out at sea, no land in sight, dog-paddling around in mysteries four miles deep. You’re wondering when and why yellow ducks became icons of childhood. You want to know what it’s like inside the toy factories of Guangdong. You’re marveling at the scale of humanity’s impact on this terraqueous globe and at the oceanic magnitude of your own ignorance.”
Il 10 gennaio 1992, una nave portacontainer che viaggiava a sud delle Aleutine, partita da Hong Kong e diretta a Tacoma, nello stato di Washington, s’imbatté in una tremenda tempesta che le fece perdere gran parte del suo carico. L'incidente ha avuto ripercussioni quasi mitiche, perché tra la merce smarrita c'erano 7.200 pacchetti di giocattoli per vasca da bagno. Ogni set includeva quattro pezzi: una tartaruga blu, una rana verde, un castoro rosso e una paperella gialla. Nell’immaginario collettivo una valanga di animaletti alla deriva tra le correnti oceaniche ha un’eco pazzesca, soprattutto quando vengono rinvenuti sulle coste più disparate, tra cui l’Alaska e il Canada; è in parte per questo motivo che Donovan Hohn ha deciso di seguirne le orme.
Hohn era insegnante al Friends Seminary di Manhattan quando sentì parlare per la prima volta di questa storia. Gli interrogativi erano molti, e tutti senza risposta, perché i misteri che avvolgono i trasporti via mare sono parecchi: da dove venivano i giocattoli? Di cosa erano fatti? Come sarebbero stati dopo 15 anni alla deriva nell’oceano?
Moby-Duck: The True Story of 28,800 Bath Toys Lost at Sea and of the Beachcombers, Oceanographers, Environmentalists, and Fools, Including the Author, Who Went in Search of Them by Donovan Hohn proved to be a disappointing book. I had high hopes for the book as it received quite a few positive reviews both on Goodreads and in the book press in general. Unfortunately I could not get past the self-revelatory clap – trap that the author seemed hell bent on sharing whether it was relevant or not. I simply do not care that he is afraid of seemingly everything and is continually worried about growing up. While I had hoped to learn more about how the ducks, beavers, turtles and frogs came to their fate what I found myself focused on, and distracted by, was the author’s whining. As I struggled to make myself focus on this book it became increasingly difficult (at least for me) to tell if this work was intended to be an environmental study, a polemic on consumerism and waste, or one of those now sadly popular “my year as a ‘fill-in-the-blank’ memoir.” To give Hohn his due he does have a knack for the pithy phrase but that was hardly enough to salvage this work from what I found to be an unfocused morass not unlike the gyre of trash rotating about in the Pacific Ocean that Hoan went off to find.