John Kessel
Born
in Buffalo, New York, The United States
September 24, 1950
Website
Genre
Influences
The Moon and the Other
7 editions
—
published
2017
—
|
|
|
Pride and Prometheus
9 editions
—
published
2008
—
|
|
|
Corrupting Dr. Nice
11 editions
—
published
1997
—
|
|
|
Good News from Outer Space
9 editions
—
published
1989
—
|
|
|
The Baum Plan for Financial Independence and Other Stories
6 editions
—
published
2008
—
|
|
|
Kafkaesque: Stories Inspired by Franz Kafka
by
—
published
2011
|
|
|
The Pure Product
3 editions
—
published
1997
—
|
|
|
Meeting in Infinity
2 editions
—
published
1992
—
|
|
|
Another Orphan
3 editions
—
published
2003
—
|
|
|
Creating the Innocent Killer: Ender's Game, Intention, and Morality
—
published
2004
|
|
“If the weakness of mainstream fiction is its deliberate smallness, the weakness of sf is its puffed-up size, its gauzy immensities. SF often pays so much attention to cosmic ideas that the story's surface is vague. Too much sf suffers from a lack of tangible reality. Muzzy settings, generic characters concocted merely for the sake of the idea, improbable action plots tidily wrapped up at the end. Too much preaching, not enough concrete, credible detail. An sf writer can get published without mastering certain things that most mainstream writers can’t evade: evocative prose style, naturalistic dialogue, attention to detail. Refraining from editorializing, over-explaining, or pat resolutions. To us, the contents of The Best American Short Stories seem paltry and timebound. To them, the contents of Asimov’s are overblown and underrealized.
It’s no wonder that sf never makes the Ravenel collection. SF is habitually strong in areas considered unessential to good mainstream fiction, and weak in those areas that are considered essential. It doesn't matter that to the sf reader most contemporary fiction is so interested in "how things really are" in tight focus that it missed "how things really are" in the big picture.
SF’s different standards make it invisible to mainstream readers, not in the literal way of H.G. Wells's invisible man, but in the cultural way of Ralph Ellison's. It's not that they can’t see us, it's that they don't know what to make of what they see. What they don't know about sf, and worse still, what they think they do know, make it impossible for them to appreciate our virtues. We are like a Harlem poet attempting to find a seat at the Algonquin round table in 1925. Our clothes are outlandish . Our accent is uncouth. The subjects we are interested in are uninteresting or incomprehensible. Our history and culture are unknown. Our reasons for being there are inadmissible. The result is embarrassment, condescension, or silence.”
―
It’s no wonder that sf never makes the Ravenel collection. SF is habitually strong in areas considered unessential to good mainstream fiction, and weak in those areas that are considered essential. It doesn't matter that to the sf reader most contemporary fiction is so interested in "how things really are" in tight focus that it missed "how things really are" in the big picture.
SF’s different standards make it invisible to mainstream readers, not in the literal way of H.G. Wells's invisible man, but in the cultural way of Ralph Ellison's. It's not that they can’t see us, it's that they don't know what to make of what they see. What they don't know about sf, and worse still, what they think they do know, make it impossible for them to appreciate our virtues. We are like a Harlem poet attempting to find a seat at the Algonquin round table in 1925. Our clothes are outlandish . Our accent is uncouth. The subjects we are interested in are uninteresting or incomprehensible. Our history and culture are unknown. Our reasons for being there are inadmissible. The result is embarrassment, condescension, or silence.”
―
“But that was the nature of love: one did not offer it with any assurance that it would change the world, even if in the end it was the only thing that could.”
― Pride and Prometheus
― Pride and Prometheus
“Is Shimmer a floor wax or a dessert topping? Is an electron a wave or a particle? Slipstream tells us that the answer is yes.”
― Feeling Very Strange: The Slipstream Anthology
― Feeling Very Strange: The Slipstream Anthology
Polls
Topics Mentioning This Author
topics | posts | views | last activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reading with Style: Winter 2012/13 Rws Completed Tasks - Winter 12/13 | 861 | 149 | Feb 28, 2013 09:01PM | |
The Seasonal Read...: Winter Challenge 2012-2013: Completed Tasks - DO NOT DELETE ANY POSTS IN THIS TOPIC | 2503 | 854 | Feb 28, 2013 09:01PM | |
2024 Reading Chal...: The Every Year Challenge - 2013 | 323 | 1250 | Jan 03, 2014 01:36PM | |
2024 Reading Chal...: Samantha (AK): 25 in 2018 | 22 | 104 | Jan 03, 2019 07:51AM | |
SciFi and Fantasy...: Favorite books of 2018 | 128 | 182 | Jan 22, 2019 07:59PM | |
The Evolution of ...: * Jim's SF &/or Influential Authors List | 29 | 70 | Mar 06, 2019 07:54AM | |
The Evolution of ...: * What This Folder Is For... | 13 | 62 | Mar 07, 2019 07:21AM | |
The Evolution of ...: * What This Folder Is For... | 13 | 78 | Mar 07, 2019 07:31AM | |
SciFi and Fantasy...: Favorite scifi authors | 30 | 79 | Mar 09, 2019 12:09AM |
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite John to Goodreads.