Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Falling Frog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Falling Frog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable YouTube video. Not every YT video needs a Wikipedia page. Deproded by author eaolson 15:40, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete again. I nominated this as a speedy a few days ago, and it still has no third-party assertion of notability. Acroterion _(talk) 15:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Just one of quite a large number of Youtube videos that some people have watched.--Danaman5 15:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Tons of YouTube videos have "many viewers". Non-notable subject and article appears to have been created for self-promotion. —dgies^t_c 16:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:N. This just seems to be one of many ordinary You Tube videos. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) (review) 17:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:N and WP:WEB. STORMTRACKER 94 Stormtracker94 17:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:N; no third-party assertion of notability. Accounting4Taste 19:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable Youtube video. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 19:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep Obviously, this video is probably the greatest video ever made. How is it less notable than Numa Numa? Arogi Ho 22:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Claiming your own video is "the greatest video ever made"? Can you explain why anyone else should care about it? —dgies^t_c 17:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Come on guys this shouln't even discussed. an article for a youtube video??? Delete asap. -- Magioladitis 23:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.