Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustafa Raza Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mustafa Raza Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable Summichum (talk) 17:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep This nomination appears to be among a series of attempts to delete articles with which the nom disagrees. Broadly, it looks like a pattern of disruptive editing by an agenda oriented account engaged in some sort of intra-Islamic factional edit war. This is being addressed by a number of editors and Admins. The nom is currently blocked for two weeks for persistent edit warring. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. COI of nom maybe, but I can't see any sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Regardless of the intent of the nominator, this article fails WP:GNG. I considered nominating it myself months ago after removing a lot of unsourced rubbish, but it slipped my mind. The only reliable source we can get - there are a few more - mention that the subject of this article was the son of a notable religious figure. Notability is not inherited per WP:NRV, and there's no reason for this article to exist. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.