Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Prator

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 August 11.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:35, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Prator

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person seems to have filled in as a temporary drummer for a lot of different bands over the years, but he's never stuck with one or developed a name for himself. This is an unsourced BLP with no hits on Google Books or Google News. Neelix (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There are a few stories about this drummer I found on Google news - [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Are these enough for him to pass WP:MUSICBIO? Bearian (talk) 20:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (without prejudice) - I was undecided on this one because Mr. Prator has an impressive resume. But since there are BLP concerns and not too many sources available to demonstrate notability in his own right, we can settle for the listing of Mr. Prator's name in a whole bunch of other articles. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:39, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.