Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life-shield blanket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and feed to the sandworms, noting nonetheless that cruft is indeed a meaningless word in AfDs. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Life-shield blanket

Crufty topic with no independent sources and no evidence of notability. Gatoclass (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable fancruft ukexpat (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable fictional item. Any relevant information should already exist in the main article(s). Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to List of Dune terminology. While the article may not be able to stand on itself as is, it may be able to be merged in with the article that I listed. Otherwise, delete. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 20:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. As usual, I object - quite strongly - to the use of the word "cruft", a term with little objective definition beyond "stuff that I dislike" (ergo, "this shouldn't be in the encyclopedia because this shouldn't be in the encyclopedia") and commonly a degoratory charge. We know better than that. Nevertheless, this works better in the list above than on its own. --Kiz o r 14:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Feed to the sandworms for the lack of citations to substantial third-party coverage establishing notability. --EEMIV (talk) 15:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Dune terminology as it's useful there but not notable enought for its own article. - Dravecky (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.