Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezhavathy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ezhavathy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure hoax. POV pushing and vandalism about an non-existent community. Ezhavahy is just an alternative name of Ezhava, a Dalit caste.
- Delete Pure hoax. There is no caste by the name Ezhavahy. It is just an alternative name of Ezhava. The user who created the page pushing POV not supported by the references he is siting. [1][2] Axxn (talk) 04:04, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note A search in JSTOR and Google books yield not a single record to prove that this is indeed a separate "Brahmin" community. Axxn (talk) 05:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- –SpacemanSpiff 06:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. -- –SpacemanSpiff 06:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: If it is an alternative name of Ezhava then a merge and redirect is possible, but a ref to prove that is needed, else Delete. --Redtigerxyz Talk 17:04, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless someone comes up with third party sources demonstrating notability. Wikidas© 10:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.