Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Fabi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Unsettled, like many of the sporting guidelines. I don't see a relist changing that with such little input. Star Mississippi 02:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Fabi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet notability at WP:NCURL. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Austria. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He has played in the highest level of competition in curling, the World Curling Championships.-- Earl Andrew - talk 15:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look at WP:NCURL. That’s not sufficient. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The criteria for the World Championships was removed entirely, and not replaced with anything. It is still under discussion. I would argue that participation at the World Championships is sufficient enough to warrant notability. especially as a skip.-- Earl Andrew - talk 21:51, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for curling competitors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.