Talk:BBC
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BBC article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
BBC was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
6.9 BritBox & 'Project Kangaroo'
[edit]'Project Kangaroo' was set up in 2006 !!!
Not in 2016 as claimed in 6.9 BritBox - "In 2016, the BBC, in partnership with fellow UK Broadcasters ITV and Channel 4 (who later withdrew from the project), set up 'project kangaroo'"
RfC on sectioning of the Charter
[edit]I've been thinking about moving the section on the 'charter and agreement' up right below the lead, as the lead itself is very technical - almost a prosified list - and doesn't really get into what makes the BBC the institution it is. Expanding, or even changing, the lead doesn't seem like the right move to me, and an expanded section on the charter provides a structured way of underlining the stature of the BBC.
I am seeking consensus, because it's a bit bigger of a change to the article, and I've expanded the section already and might be biased towards it. The proposed sectioning would be:
- Lead
- Charter and Agreement
- History
- ...
JackTheSecond (talk) 11:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
BBC uses account of journalist working for Iran-backed news agency in Palestine deaths article
https://m.maariv.co.il/news/world/Article-1081271 2A00:A041:1CE0:0:B03C:9581:6FC4:EBDA (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
A State-Funded Media Outlet
[edit]Since BBC is funded with public money, does not this make it state-funded? Is not this a point that this acticle could highlight? 2.27.2.54 (talk) 14:43, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- The very first sentence reads 'public service broadcaster', implying government funding. Also, 'state-media' carries a different implication regarding independence from the funding government than the large degree of independence the BBC enjoys. JackTheSecond (talk) 16:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Last section.
"In 2023, the BBC's offices in New Delhi were searched by officials from the Income Tax Department. The move came after the BBC released a documentary on Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The documentary investigated Modi's role in the 2002 Gujarat riots, which resulted in more than 1,000 casualties."
to
"In 2023, the BBC's offices in New Delhi were searched by officials from the Income Tax Department. The move came after the BBC released a documentary on Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The documentary investigated Modi's role in the 2002 Gujarat riots, which resulted in more than 1,000 deaths." 121.98.30.202 (talk) 04:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC) 121.98.30.202 (talk) 04:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done : And confirmed in source. ("killed") JackTheSecond (talk) 10:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Media bias regarding the Israel-Hamas war
[edit]This middle east conflict is obviously a contentious issue. This proposed edit asserting "Anti-Israel bias and antisemitism" of the BBC is contentious in itself. John Simpson, the World Affairs editor for the BBC, commented on the BBC's approach to conflict, "We don't take sides. We don't use loaded words like "evil" or "cowardly". We don't talk about "terrorists". And we're not the only ones to follow this line. Some of the world's most respected news organisations have exactly the same policy. But the BBC gets particular attention, partly because we've got strong critics in politics and in the press, and partly because we're rightly held to an especially high standard. But part of keeping to that high standard is to be as objective as it's possible to be." The proposed edit and its loaded accusation is non neutral, and also overlooks complaints from the other side that for the BBC, and western media, "Israeli life is deemed to be worth more than a Palestinian life". Inserting material that furthers the agenda of either side or discredits a news source, and the BBC is one of the more reliable news sources on the conflict, is a breach of neutrality. It is also a subject that belongs on the talk page of the conflict article itself, rather than singling out just one media source (BBC in the case here), in how the media is critiqued on its reporting. Gabriella MNT (talk) 13:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Extensive external sources have singled out BBC for antisemitism. It is misleading to censure the referenced claims. Certainly, one can add other referenced claims that disagree, but our job is to work with sources. Minden500 (talk) 13:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've broadend this discussion out to the Israel-Hamas war talk page. Gabriella MNT (talk) 14:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class Eurovision articles
- Low-importance Eurovision articles
- All WikiProject Eurovision pages
- C-Class BBC articles
- Top-importance BBC articles
- WikiProject BBC articles
- C-Class Media articles
- Top-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- C-Class television articles
- Top-importance television articles
- C-Class British television articles
- Top-importance British television articles
- British television task force articles
- C-Class Television stations articles
- Top-importance Television stations articles
- Television stations task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- C-Class Radio articles
- Top-importance Radio articles
- UK Radio articles
- WikiProject Radio articles
- C-Class England-related articles
- Top-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- High-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- C-Class London-related articles
- High-importance London-related articles
- C-Class Brands articles
- High-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors