Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ed Poor/Proposed decision

all proposed

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

  • Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
  • Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
  • Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, [N] Arbitrators is/are recused and [N] is/are inactive, so [N] votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

Motions and requests by the parties

edit

Place those on the discussion page.

Proposed temporary injunctions

edit

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

Template

edit

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:


Proposed final decision

edit

Proposed principles

edit

Template

edit

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

Proposed findings of fact

edit

Template

edit

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

Proposed remedies

edit

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

edit

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

Proposed enforcement

edit

Template

edit

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

Discussion by Arbitrators

edit

General

edit

Motion to close

edit

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

  1. Ed Poor (talk · contribs) has offered to resign as a Wikipedia Bureaucrat. He remains a Wikipedia Administrator in good standing and a valued member of the Wikipedia community. Fred Bauder 18:17, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I'm happy with this. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 22:06, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. As am I. James F. (talk) 22:53, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Close →Raul654 22:59, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]