Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groasis Waterboxx
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —HueSatLum 21:36, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Groasis Waterboxx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
To my opinion an advertisement. It is part of a wikiwide promotion campaign run by a SPA (only created and maintains this article, the inventor and his by now removed company) Night of the Big Wind talk 14:26, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I think the references indicate notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:33, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Concerns about tone/style can be easily addressed by copy editing, per WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM. The topic passes WP:GNG. Some examples of reliable sources comprised of significant coverage:
- The New York Times – Developing a ‘Water Battery’ for Trees
- Popular Science Magazine – AquaPro Holland Groasis Waterboxx
- Popular Science Magazine – Invention Awards: A Box That Keeps Plants Hydrated in the Desert
- Comment - The article has been copy edited to address and correct promotional tone matters. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:26, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Meets GNG and is well sourced. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:44, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I am now in dubio. The article is now far more neutral in form, but it is still part of a campaign over several Wiki's, including the English, Finnish, Dutch and Spanish one... Night of the Big Wind talk 09:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Content is referenced and contains little or no claims beyond what can be reliably referenced.
- The "Background" section could use some more inline referencing.
- User Special:Contributions/Ingeev does seem to be a WP:Single-purpose account, and should be monitored. Apart from his/her contributions, there is no indication of organized effort. I created this article, and I have nothing to do with Groasis.
- I agree that content from the Pieter Hoff-article should be removed, but which is the third article BigWind speaks of ?
- As long as the other language Groasis articles copy this English one and its references, I see nothing wrong with that. TGCP (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Already removed as advertisement by speedy delete: [1] Night of the Big Wind talk 17:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.