Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basil von Burmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basil von Burmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. 1 paragraph source in Russian. Elizium23 (talk) 10:34, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 16:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I don't quite know how the fact that this article has a one-paragraph source in Russian leads to failing WP:GNG. More checks would be needed of what sources exist to establish that, and the language of sources is immaterial, so the nomination statement and any "per nom" opinion are invalid. More important is that this article is a direct translation of that source, so should be speedily deleted as a blatant copyright violation. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- I see absolutely nothing in this brief bio to indicate that he was notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.