Dan Harkless

edit

Hello, this user used bare reasons written in article talk for re-add his very mistaken tags, even that other user says that are an unexistent "contradiction" in the "Dan Harkless" problematic content, demonstrating lack of understainding in his procedure. Difuarti (talk) 23:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Difuarti I really don't mean to be rude, but it's painfully obvious that English isn't your first language. You shouldn't be removing the tags, as the changes you have made are in very broken English.
I'm going to retire the tags, you should discuss the issue on the articles talk page. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 00:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

A cup of tea for you!

edit
  thank you for your contributions!! :D xRozuRozu (tc) 17:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

page revert alert

edit

Want to notify you that 4B movement was reverted by another IP editor against the concensus a week later, to add the wiki link yet again. I think at this stage WP:SEMI should be considered, as it seems like an attempt to avoid detection. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 04:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

This could just be a good faith editor trying to add a reference for the text. I've reverted it for the moment, I'll add a reason to the tag to explain the situation. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 17:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Defender of the wiki

edit
  The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For unearthing falsified references that persisted in the Elias Khoury biography for nearly five years. Innisfree987 (talk) 20:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Is this better

edit

See Wikipedia:Consensus. Thank you, Polygnotus (talk) 22:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply