User contributions for Aron Manning
Results for Aron Manning talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 704 edits. Account created on 16 April 2019.
29 June 2019
- 18:4218:42, 29 June 2019 diff hist +2,854 User talk:Aron Manning →June 2019: NinjaRobotPirate: Thank you for reverting the CU block. Might I ask you to also revert closing the unblock request with the reason: "Confirmed sock puppetry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:31, 29 June 2019 (UTC)", or am I allowed to do it?
- 16:0016:00, 29 June 2019 diff hist +615 User talk:Aron Manning →June 2019: Thank you. Might I ask you (1) which point was the ground for checking, and (2) how a forgotten signature mistakenly added by another account becomes inappropriate use of alternative accounts?
- 15:0515:05, 29 June 2019 diff hist +1,414 User talk:Aron Manning →June 2019
28 June 2019
- 19:5319:53, 28 June 2019 diff hist +427 User talk:Aron Manning →June 2019
27 June 2019
- 23:4623:46, 27 June 2019 diff hist +386 User talk:Aron Manning →June 2019
22 June 2019
- 08:4908:49, 22 June 2019 diff hist +2,348 User talk:Aron Manning →June 2019: Unblock request after 5 days of letting it rest.
19 June 2019
- 09:3709:37, 19 June 2019 diff hist −434 User talk:Aron Manning Removing non-sequitur opinion per Wikipedia:User_pages#Removal_of_comments,_notices,_and_warnings.
18 June 2019
- 12:1312:13, 18 June 2019 diff hist −8,876 User talk:Aron Manning Removing false accusations.
- 03:3003:30, 18 June 2019 diff hist +2,161 User talk:Aron Manning →Conduct at Boeing 737 MAX MR
17 June 2019
- 13:1813:18, 17 June 2019 diff hist +1,668 User:Aron Manning/737 Max RM →The policy: Add "Max" sources listed by #Calidum.
- 13:0913:09, 17 June 2019 diff hist +357 User:Aron Manning/737 Max RM Ignored the opening !vote.
- 11:2811:28, 17 June 2019 diff hist +72 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →The close fails to meet COI-neutrality requirement of RMCI: Edit: Rewording.
- 10:5510:55, 17 June 2019 diff hist +72 User:Aron Manning/737 Max RM →The close by the same closer a second time seems to be a conflict-of-interest: Significant new information: The close fails to meet COI-neutrality requirement of RMCI
- 10:4710:47, 17 June 2019 diff hist +113 m User:Aron Manning/737 Max RM →Requested move 25 May 2019: Update link.
- 10:4310:43, 17 June 2019 diff hist −1 m Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Further debate - The close did not follow RMCI: Fix anchor.
- 10:4110:41, 17 June 2019 diff hist +60 m Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Further debate - The close did not follow RMCI: Edit header for concision.
- 10:3710:37, 17 June 2019 diff hist +761 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Responses to summary: What editors "feel" does not matter, MRV is not a forum of opinions. Please present evidence, if you disagree. [Evidence proves] the "fact" you present is false: "MAX" is not "preponderance of reliable sources". As per WP:NHC (and RMCI): "discarding irrelevant arguments: [..] those based on personal opinion only".
- 10:2610:26, 17 June 2019 diff hist +6,147 User talk:Aron Manning →Conduct at Boeing 737 MAX MR
16 June 2019
- 23:0123:01, 16 June 2019 diff hist +287 User talk:Aron Manning/737 Max RM Info current
- 19:3819:38, 16 June 2019 diff hist −1 m User talk:Paine Ellsworth →Close notes – 737 Max: Maybe there... sorry for the... disturbance :-)
- 19:3719:37, 16 June 2019 diff hist −6 m User talk:Paine Ellsworth →Close notes – 737 Max: Oops
- 19:3719:37, 16 June 2019 diff hist +371 User talk:Paine Ellsworth →Close notes – 737 Max: Msg
- 19:0419:04, 16 June 2019 diff hist +2,445 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Responses to summary: it's based on the assumption that "737 MAX" is the "common usage", which is not the case as the RM and MRV only listed 9+ IRS using "MAX", and 13+ using "Max"
- 16:3216:32, 16 June 2019 diff hist +166 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Further debate: do we have consensus "The close did not follow WP:RMCI"?: Edit: rewording.
- 13:4613:46, 16 June 2019 diff hist +1,666 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Responses to summary: "don't care what happens"? A little consistency, please: Special:Diff/901738499, Special:Diff/901758667
- 12:5912:59, 16 June 2019 diff hist +155 m Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Boeing 737 MAX: Fix !vote anchor.
- 12:4612:46, 16 June 2019 diff hist +2,051 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Boeing 737 MAX: Please focus on the topic: deciding whether the close followed WP:RMCI. Off-topic comments belong to the user talk page.
- 11:0611:06, 16 June 2019 diff hist −1 m Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Boeing 737 MAX: Remove accidental blockquote.
- 10:2310:23, 16 June 2019 diff hist +48 m Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Responses to summary: Update: Re-categorized an WP:OFFICIAL !vote and a personal preference vote after more thorough evaluation.
- 10:0010:00, 16 June 2019 diff hist +3 m Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Responses to summary: More apt heading
- 09:4909:49, 16 June 2019 diff hist +30 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Summary responses: separate with heading.
- 09:3909:39, 16 June 2019 diff hist +1,050 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Reason to reopen: Edit: add heading.
- 09:1109:11, 16 June 2019 diff hist +1,085 User:Aron Manning/737 Max RM →The policy applied (proof): Cite from WP:RMCI
- 08:2208:22, 16 June 2019 diff hist +322 User:Aron Manning/737 Max RM →The close by the same closer a second time seems to be a conflict-of-interest: Guideline cite.
- 07:2607:26, 16 June 2019 diff hist +2 m User:Aron Manning/737 Max RM →Supporting arguments: is heading.
- 07:2007:20, 16 June 2019 diff hist +2 m Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Further debate: do we have consensus "The close did not follow WP:RMCI"?: Further fix heading level.
- 07:1907:19, 16 June 2019 diff hist +2 m Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Further debate: do we have consensus "The close did not follow WP:RMCI"?: Fix heading level.
- 07:1407:14, 16 June 2019 diff hist +942 User:Aron Manning/737 Max RM 2 March args recategorized: O -> P, P-> M
- 06:4606:46, 16 June 2019 diff hist +1,042 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Boeing 737 MAX: Anchors to endorse/overturn (top-level) comments.
- 05:5605:56, 16 June 2019 diff hist −3 Talk:Boeing 737 MAX groundings →Norwegian ferry flight
- 05:5605:56, 16 June 2019 diff hist +513 Talk:Boeing 737 MAX groundings →Norwegian ferry flight: reply
- 05:4805:48, 16 June 2019 diff hist +5,948 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Boeing 737 MAX: To determine consensus WP:NHC applies.
- 04:0104:01, 16 June 2019 diff hist +1,818 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 June →Unsound arguments: The overturn argument is clear, and evidence-based: #The close did not follow WP:RMCI. The endorse comments have not debated this with evidence-based arguments, but there is a lot of noise distracting from the point.
15 June 2019
- 23:2823:28, 15 June 2019 diff hist +38 User talk:Aron Manning/737 Max RM Force toc.
- 23:2023:20, 15 June 2019 diff hist +982 User talk:Aron Manning/737 Max RM →Redalert2fan's !vote: new section
- 21:2821:28, 15 June 2019 diff hist +601 m User:Aron Manning/737 Max RM Detail the 2 vs 2 aviation sources, misinterpret -> misunderstand.
- 20:1720:17, 15 June 2019 diff hist +152 Boeing 737 MAX Undid revision 901883971 by 73.90.207.137 (talk) Reason: WP contains information from independent rliable sources, not just officials. The statement "susceptible to erroneous activation" is widely reported on, not a speculation. See WP:CRYSTALBALL for the definition of the latter. Tag: Undo
- 20:1120:11, 15 June 2019 diff hist +984 User talk:Rosbif73 →737 Max cite: new section
- 19:5319:53, 15 June 2019 diff hist −58 Annette Jacky Messomo Undid revision 901992734 by 80.6.169.20 (talk) Reason: unsourced, non-encyclopedic, negative content. Tag: Undo
- 19:0019:00, 15 June 2019 diff hist +766 User talk:Paine Ellsworth →Close notes – 737 Max: reworded the summary to focus on the close