Aron Manning

Welcome

Hello, Aron Manning, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community - subscribe to The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Did we really?

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Did we read the same article and submitted the same content at the same time? Just be careful though, from what I remember reading your version is a bit closer to the original text Shencypeter (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Shencypeter: Yep, though the timing on my part is not accidental. I was fixing the removal of the main point concealed as copyedit. —Aron M🍂 (🛄📤) 14:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Shencypeter: I added more detail, but I find your wording more refined, feel free to improve. —Aron M🍂 (🛄📤) 14:34, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Aron Manning: done, thanks Shencypeter (talk) 10:19, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:33, 17 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Aron Manning (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no intent to disrupt the encyclopedia, thus this block is "not necessary to prevent damage or disruption". In response to the concerns of bludgeoning, I'll be more mindful of my responses and conciseness in the future. This request is intentionally verbose to satisfyingly communicate my intent to improve – not disrupt – the encyclopedia.

A few editors had concerns regarding my edits in a single ongoing MRV discussion in the project namespace, not public-facing articles.
I understand my answers that are criticized for bludgeoning were ineffective in creating a meaningful, factual discussion.
My answers were not concise enough, included too much evidence, policy citations, and long links (diffs), that resulted in a magnitudinal increase of the raw wikitext I committed (28% of the page). Concision improved in recent comments in response to the feedback.
I was bold to point out unproven assumptions in the majority of the RM arguments and some MRV arguments. My intent was to improve the discussion by making factual arguments, providing citations from policies, the RM and the MRV.
There is little repetition in my comments: most of my comments present new arguments, addressing the explicit or implied arguments in the comment it responds to. The claims of bludgeoning came from 3 editors on the opposing side of this heated MRV debate, after I refuted with evidence some arguments. Such claims are hardly neutral.
My comments did not make personal remarks, off-topic arguments, nor personal attacks, that would disrupt the MRV process. —Aron M🍂 (🛄📤) 08:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have no intent to disrupt the encyclopedia, thus this block is "not necessary to prevent damage or disruption". In response to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aron_Manning&oldid=902334172#Conduct_at_Boeing_737_MAX_MR  the concerns of bludgeoning], I'll be more mindful of my responses and conciseness in the future. This request is intentionally verbose to satisfyingly communicate my intent to improve – not disrupt – the encyclopedia.

* A few editors had concerns regarding my edits in a single [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2019_June#Boeing_737_MAX  ongoing MRV discussion] in the project namespace, not public-facing articles.
* I understand my answers that are criticized for bludgeoning were ineffective in creating a meaningful, factual discussion.
* My answers were not concise enough, included too much evidence, policy citations, and long links (diffs), that resulted in a magnitudinal increase of the raw wikitext I committed (28% of the page). Concision improved in recent comments in response to the feedback.
* I was bold to point out unproven assumptions in the majority of the RM arguments and some MRV arguments. My intent was to improve the discussion by making factual arguments, providing citations from policies, the RM and the MRV.
* There is little repetition in my comments: most of my comments present new arguments, addressing the explicit or implied arguments in the comment it responds to. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aron_Manning&oldid=902334172#Conduct_at_Boeing_737_MAX_MR  claims of bludgeoning came from 3 editors] on the opposing side of this heated MRV debate, after I refuted with evidence some arguments. Such claims are hardly neutral.
* My comments did not make personal remarks, off-topic arguments, nor [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=901738499&oldid=901738354&title=User_talk:Garretka&diffmode=source  personal attacks], that would disrupt the MRV process. —[[User talk:Aron Manning|<span style="color:#25dd;background:#af01;box-shadow:#af03 0 0 8px;font-family:Segoe print">''Aron M🍂''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Aron Manning|<small style="background:#af01;box-shadow:#af03 0 0 8px">(🛄📤)</small>]]   <span style="color:#888">08:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)</span> |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have no intent to disrupt the encyclopedia, thus this block is "not necessary to prevent damage or disruption". In response to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aron_Manning&oldid=902334172#Conduct_at_Boeing_737_MAX_MR  the concerns of bludgeoning], I'll be more mindful of my responses and conciseness in the future. This request is intentionally verbose to satisfyingly communicate my intent to improve – not disrupt – the encyclopedia.

* A few editors had concerns regarding my edits in a single [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2019_June#Boeing_737_MAX  ongoing MRV discussion] in the project namespace, not public-facing articles.
* I understand my answers that are criticized for bludgeoning were ineffective in creating a meaningful, factual discussion.
* My answers were not concise enough, included too much evidence, policy citations, and long links (diffs), that resulted in a magnitudinal increase of the raw wikitext I committed (28% of the page). Concision improved in recent comments in response to the feedback.
* I was bold to point out unproven assumptions in the majority of the RM arguments and some MRV arguments. My intent was to improve the discussion by making factual arguments, providing citations from policies, the RM and the MRV.
* There is little repetition in my comments: most of my comments present new arguments, addressing the explicit or implied arguments in the comment it responds to. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aron_Manning&oldid=902334172#Conduct_at_Boeing_737_MAX_MR  claims of bludgeoning came from 3 editors] on the opposing side of this heated MRV debate, after I refuted with evidence some arguments. Such claims are hardly neutral.
* My comments did not make personal remarks, off-topic arguments, nor [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=901738499&oldid=901738354&title=User_talk:Garretka&diffmode=source  personal attacks], that would disrupt the MRV process. —[[User talk:Aron Manning|<span style="color:#25dd;background:#af01;box-shadow:#af03 0 0 8px;font-family:Segoe print">''Aron M🍂''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Aron Manning|<small style="background:#af01;box-shadow:#af03 0 0 8px">(🛄📤)</small>]]   <span style="color:#888">08:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)</span> |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have no intent to disrupt the encyclopedia, thus this block is "not necessary to prevent damage or disruption". In response to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aron_Manning&oldid=902334172#Conduct_at_Boeing_737_MAX_MR  the concerns of bludgeoning], I'll be more mindful of my responses and conciseness in the future. This request is intentionally verbose to satisfyingly communicate my intent to improve – not disrupt – the encyclopedia.

* A few editors had concerns regarding my edits in a single [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2019_June#Boeing_737_MAX  ongoing MRV discussion] in the project namespace, not public-facing articles.
* I understand my answers that are criticized for bludgeoning were ineffective in creating a meaningful, factual discussion.
* My answers were not concise enough, included too much evidence, policy citations, and long links (diffs), that resulted in a magnitudinal increase of the raw wikitext I committed (28% of the page). Concision improved in recent comments in response to the feedback.
* I was bold to point out unproven assumptions in the majority of the RM arguments and some MRV arguments. My intent was to improve the discussion by making factual arguments, providing citations from policies, the RM and the MRV.
* There is little repetition in my comments: most of my comments present new arguments, addressing the explicit or implied arguments in the comment it responds to. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aron_Manning&oldid=902334172#Conduct_at_Boeing_737_MAX_MR  claims of bludgeoning came from 3 editors] on the opposing side of this heated MRV debate, after I refuted with evidence some arguments. Such claims are hardly neutral.
* My comments did not make personal remarks, off-topic arguments, nor [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=901738499&oldid=901738354&title=User_talk:Garretka&diffmode=source  personal attacks], that would disrupt the MRV process. —[[User talk:Aron Manning|<span style="color:#25dd;background:#af01;box-shadow:#af03 0 0 8px;font-family:Segoe print">''Aron M🍂''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Aron Manning|<small style="background:#af01;box-shadow:#af03 0 0 8px">(🛄📤)</small>]]   <span style="color:#888">08:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)</span> |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}