User talk:Michael32710
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 20:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:LilienthalFliegekunst.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Meissnerkasselerkuppe.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:MuehlenbergDerwitz.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Done! --Michael 19:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Antonius Raab
[edit]Danke für das Foto, das man allerdings nicht sehen kann. Ich nehme aber an, dass das ein Serverproblem ist, und das Foto in den nächsten Stunden erscheinen wird. --Nicola (talk) 11:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Chamberlin and his plane that he flew from N.Y. to Germany 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Bild Pilatus SB-2
[edit]Hallo Michael32710 danke für das Hochladen des Bildes der Pilatus SB-2. Ich wollte fragen ob Du vieleicht so auch ein Bild der Pilatus P-4 hochladen kannst das es auf wikipedia verwendet werden darf. Ich hab da mit de ganzen Urheberzeugs nicht so den Durchblick. Danke & GrussFFA P-16 (talk) 11:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo FFA P-16!
Das kommt ganz auf das Bild an. Wenn Du mir zum Beispiel ein Bild per Mail schicken würdest, dass Du selbst aufgenommen hast, würden wir das sicher für die Verwendung in der WP hochladen können. Alternativ könnte ich Dir auch den benötigten Content für das "einfache Upload-Formular" zusenden. Und lädst das Bild damit selbst hoch. Schreib mal näher, um welches Bild/Bilder es sich handelt. Liebe Grüße --79.211.42.137 16:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)- Nun ich bin mit der Frage hier her gelangt wegen dem Bild
File:Pilatus SB-2 HB-AEP.jpg Offenbar besteht dort kein Problem mit dem Urheberrecht (Source=ETH-Bibliothek Zürich, Bildarchiv / Fotograf: Unbekannt / Ans_05035-489 / Public Domain Mark). Ich selbst habe kein Fotovon der echten Pilatus P-4 (die ist schon vor meiner Geburt abgestürtzt. ich habe jedoch ein Foto von meinem Pilatus P-4 Modell hochgeladen. Ein Bild der echten P-4 wäre natürlich besser. Jedoch hab ich bisher nur die Bilder von Herman Keist gefunden [1] glaube aber nicht das er der Fotograf ist). Darum war der Sinn meiner Anfrage ob Michael32710 wie bei der SB-2 vieleicht auf die selbe Weise für ein Bild der Pilatus P-4 sorgen kann.FFA P-16 (talk) 17:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo FFA P-16!
Das Bild von der SB-2 habe ich bei der ETH gefunden. Die ETH hat die Bilder ihres Archivs dankenswerterweise unter Public Domain Lizenz freigegeben. Deswegen konnte ich das SB-2-Bild in die Wikipedia bringen. Leider konnte ich im ETH Archiv kein Bild der P-4 finden. Liebe Grüße --Michael 23:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo FFA P-16!
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Trump n757af michael bludworth.jpg
[edit]
Ww2censor (talk) 23:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Category:Peilschiff has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Ein Dahmer (talk) 05:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
A400M drehen
[edit]Hallo, du wolltest File:Airbus A400M 'Atlas' (28366255975).jpg drehen lassen weil die Fluglage unnatürlich aussieht. Das Bild zeigt jedoch ein übliches Flugmanöver, und ich habe auch ein Video gefunden, in dem genau die abgebildete 90°-Steilkurve mit Kondensbildung zu sehen ist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7r-RCrjRyZg?t=118 (nach 2 Minuten). Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 23:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Danke Sitacuisses, für Deine Recherche und die Korrektur meines Drehauftrags. Liebe Grüße --Michael 06:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Ba349 Prototyp Senkrechtstart 1944.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Speravir 19:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Michael, nochmal deutlich: Bitte valide Quelle eintragen und, sofern dort angegeben, den Fotografen. Wen letzterer bekannt ist, kann es sein, dass das Bild trotz der Ergänzung gelöscht werden muss, bis 70 Jahre nach dem Tode des Urhebers, also Fotografen, vergangen sind. Admins könnten es dann wiederherstellen. — Speravir – 19:10, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Speravir, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Quelle für (File:Ba349 Prototyp Senkrechtstart 1944.png) eingetragen. --Michael 12:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- OK. Und in dem Buch steht kein Hinweis zu einem Fotografen oder, wo sie das Bild herhaben? Bei Büchern findet man das oft weiter hinten in einem separaten Anhang. Ich meine, solange der Fotograf unbekannt bleibt, kann das Bild bleiben, weil mehr als 70 Jahre nach Veröffentlichung vergangen sind, aber im Zweifel bist Du derjenige, der mit eventuellen Erben Ärger bekommen könnte. — Speravir – 18:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Speravir: Wenn ich Hinweise zum Fotografen gefunden hätte, hätte ich sie unter "Author" eingetragen.
- BTW mein persönliches Feedback: Ich hab' kein Herzblut an meinen Tätigkeiten in Commons. Wenn Mitarbeiter wie Du, die "Kontrolleurs"- und "Lizenzprüfer"-Status haben, meinen, dass ich Fehler mache, dann tut, was ihr meint tun zu müssen. Ich komm' damit klar.
- Stutzig werd' ich bei Ansprachen wie „Michael, nochmal deutlich: ...“ oder „im Zweifel bist Du derjenige, der mit eventuellen Erben Ärger bekommen könnte“. Da frag' ich mich tatsächlich, ob ich das als kollegiale Hilfe oder als Drohung aufzufassen habe. --Michael 22:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- Das war nicht als Drohung gemeint, sondern um den Hintergrund deutlich zu machen. Der Beginn oben bezog sich darauf, dass ich nicht wusste, ob und wenn ja wie gut Du den englischen Löschantrag verstehst, es gibt durchaus Leute, die damit Probleme haben. Ich sollte dann wohl auf solch einen Extratext verzichten. Nach deiner Ergänzung ziehe ich dann diesen Löschantrag zurück. — Speravir – 00:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- OK. Und in dem Buch steht kein Hinweis zu einem Fotografen oder, wo sie das Bild herhaben? Bei Büchern findet man das oft weiter hinten in einem separaten Anhang. Ich meine, solange der Fotograf unbekannt bleibt, kann das Bild bleiben, weil mehr als 70 Jahre nach Veröffentlichung vergangen sind, aber im Zweifel bist Du derjenige, der mit eventuellen Erben Ärger bekommen könnte. — Speravir – 18:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! LeuchtfeuerDornbusch 2016-06-01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-09-26 Kassel-Calden Terminal (KSF).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hann Muenden Downtown.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! GrossStresowPreussenFriedr.Wilh.IDetail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DieSchauendeWuepperFront.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
File:ErsterOeffentlicherFlugzeugSchlepp1927-04-18.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nicola (talk) 13:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Koordinaten
[edit]Es ist nur eine informative Frage: Du hast die Kamererakoordinaten dieses [BGS Puma inner German border.jpg Bildes] relativ genau ermittelt und eingetragen. Hast Du die Koordinaten aus einer mir unbekannten Bildinformation herbekommen oder hast Du sie manuell aus Bild und Karte ermittelt?--79.214er (talk) 10:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo 79.214er,
mit Bild und „Karte“: Konkret benutze ich „Google Earth“ mit der „Gelände“-Option. Damit kann man das vorliegende Bild sehr gut nachstellen. Nach meiner Auffassung kommt man damit der tatsächlichen Kameraposition ausreichend Nahe, um den interessierten Betrachter per Template:Location an den „Aufnahmeort“ zu führen. In diesem speziellen Fall war dieser „Aufnahmeort“ nach meiner Vermutung ein weiterer Helikopter; die Kameraposition lässt sich also nicht auf der „Erdoberfläche“ wiederfinden bzw. einnehmen. Liebe Grüße --Michael (talk) 11:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)- Ich komme aus der Gegend, kann mich in die Topographie hineinversetzten und habe die Position ähnlich ermittelt, kenne aber die Gelände-Option noch nicht.--79.214er (talk) 11:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo 79.214er,
Google Earth (Google Earth Pro 7.3.2.5776 (64-bit)) -> Linke Spalte „Ebenen“ -> [x] Gelände
Damit werden die Höheninformationen in die „flachen“ Bilder reingerechnet, was bei „schrägen“ Ansichten die Horizontline doch sehr realistisch erzeugt. Liebe Grüße --Michael (talk) 11:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo 79.214er,
- Ich komme aus der Gegend, kann mich in die Topographie hineinversetzten und habe die Position ähnlich ermittelt, kenne aber die Gelände-Option noch nicht.--79.214er (talk) 11:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo 79.214er,
File:1934-06-09 CoupeMondialeVincennes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
New version
[edit]Hi, please don't upload new versions of files like you did here. I reverted your modification. This one has original colors from the source. You can create derivatives if you want with a link, but it's better not to touch uploads from others, in general. They may not appreciate your contributions. You can also ask. COM:OVERWRITE. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello Michael32710,
Thak you for uploading the file. however, this file is not automatically free as you can see her. In he.wiki have a special page - OTRS permission requests from IDF Spokesperson (her). This time I will add this file to the list. -- Geagea (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Dear Geagea, thank you for starting the ORTS process for me. I was not familiar with the procedure. --Michael (talk) 08:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 15:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
File:X-59 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
— Huntster (t @ c) 19:27, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Junkers Ju 287 V1 side view.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Junkers Ju 287 V1 side view.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Xunks (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Ju 287 V1 Brandis hangar.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Xunks (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
File:ModellEindeckerE4-20WindkanalAva1919.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Raymond 11:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:50 днів активного спротиву окупанту 06.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:50 днів активного спротиву окупанту 06.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 21:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:SZD-59 Acro 2.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:SZD-59 Acro 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Polarlys (talk) 15:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
File:2023-10-09 Yanshuf SouraskyMedicalCentre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|