Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Nagy
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Andy Nagy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:GNG; the only coverage available appears to be from the NBA itself, barring some mere-mentions in newspapers that I found on ProQuest. Would have met the old NBASKET standard that all top-tier players, coaches and referees are notable, but as that is no longer in force, here we are at AFD. signed, Rosguill talk 20:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Basketball, and Ohio. signed, Rosguill talk 20:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Basketball referees, even in the NBA, were not considered inherently notable, even by the old SNG. In any event, GNG needs to be met.—Bagumba (talk) 07:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG with lack of multiple sources of significant coverage from independent, reliable sources.—Bagumba (talk) 07:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete the sourcing does not rise to the level of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.