carol. (not getting notifications)'s Reviews > Skinwalker

Skinwalker by Faith Hunter
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3978225
Let me get one thing straight: I don't read romance novels. If romance is included within the scope of main character experience, I'll still read it. But if the main story is magickal, wonderful, soulmate kind of l-o-v-e and there is pining, angst, and ridiculous pretend fights when really they l-o-v-e each other but can't admit it, that's a big fat "pass" for me. "Skinwalker" won't appeal to those who like a little romance with their paranormal. Move along now.

Jane is an interesting, unusual entry into the UF field, featuring an part-Cherokee woman with a one-of-a-kind ability to shapechange. Jane rides into town on her motorcycle Bitsa ("bits of this, bits of that"), interviewing for a job with the New Orleans vampire clan, hunting a rogue vampire that is tarnishing their reputation and hurting their position with the police. After meeting Katie, one of the vampire council representatives and madam of a house of ill repute, Jane gets the job. Efforts to discover the rogue are hampered as Jane is shadowed by a couple of men that might be working with a different agenda.

Lead supporting role in this book goes to Beast, a mountain lion who shares Jane's body. Unfortunately, Jane's memory gaps leave her without explanation for her and Beast's relationship, but that will change after she meets a Cherokee shaman and requires vamp healing during her search for the rogue.

Set in New Orleans, the city proves to be a lush background. Hunter gives a good feel for the details, from cobblestone streets to decorative balconies, to the overbearing heat and humidity. In the UF field, there are many different degrees in an author's ability to use language, and Hunter does well with few missteps. While Jane herself is a very direct person, she does describe things in enough detail to keep the story interesting and unique, from teapots to the smell of a motorcycle. For a first novel, it does a decent job of avoiding the dreaded info-dump, and feeds bits and pieces to the reader in large enough chunks to give context but not bog down the story. It also allows some of Jane's internal humor to show through when she is being professional enough to not say her remarks out loud.

We did get one girly scene of her shopping and then dancing, which makes me wonder a little if Hunter is trying to be all things to all readers. You know--Jane rides a bike, carries a bad-ass gun--but can wear frothy little skirts and dance! Her long hair bothered me as well, especially given Jane as a no-nonsense fighter. I think it makes sense in context of Native heritage, but that's not given as a reason.

Had I been Hunter's editor, I would have asked that they stressed that this is the first time Jane interacts with "normal" vamps. I think she took some uncharacteristic and stupid actions (according to what she says to the reader in the narrative) when she first meets Leo, the head of the council, but that could probably be explained by the newness of the experience. There are a few things along these lines that trouble me about Jane's decision-making. I'm not sure it's internally consistent.

Still, it's a decent book. The mystery of the "rogue vamp" that doesn't act like a vamp moves along nicely. While sexual tension plays a role in many of her interactions, both male and female, it doesn't overtake the story or focus on the mystery. A supporting character of Jane's close friend Molly and her godchildren Angie and Evan help humanize Jane's rough edges and show her caring side. While it doesn't avoid all of the UF tropes, Hunter does a nice job of making a strong, distinct female character. Her unusual ethnicity and mystical connections make a nice touch in the UF world of vampires, fae and weres.

Overall, it's probably a 3.5 read on my personal scale, but I'm rounding up because it's one of the standouts in the field.

Cross posted at http://clsiewert.wordpress.com/2012/1...
124 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Skinwalker.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

August 3, 2010 – Shelved
June 7, 2012 – Started Reading
June 8, 2012 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-29 of 29 (29 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Chelsea (new)

Chelsea Frothy skirts, eh?


message 2: by mark (new)

mark monday old but still always-valid complaint: Half Stars Needed on Goodreads!


carol. (not getting notifications) I'm a half star kind of person. Of course, if we did, people like Richard would come along and rate things 3.75 stars ;)


message 4: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus When I feel *really* picky, I rate by eighths. I gave one book 4.875 stars once. A friend blew a gasket and demanded I up it to 5 or she'd rip her hair out with frustration.

Still growin' in, I reckon.


carol. (not getting notifications) I was hoping you'd find this.

So eighths is how it works out. I had noticed it, but had not figured out the underlying scale. Personally, I'm still waiting for the book I can give pi (and no, not Life of Pi--I didn't like it that much).


message 6: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus Life of Pi was not a good book. I don't think it deserves the hoo-hah and yodels it's been getting lo these many years, but it surely touched a nerve in a lot of folks. *shrug*

I gave a book a rating of one time, and got lots of angry feedback about being elitist, a snob, fancy-pantsy, etc etc.


carol. (not getting notifications) Accusations of 'elitist' among booklovers? Sad. I thought it was clever and funny.


message 8: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus It was a few years ago, and I gave it to Wolf Hall, whose adherents found the idea disrespectful. Especially combined with my irritated castigation of the author for unnecessary obscurantism. Her refusal to use clear antecedents is just foolish show-offiness, IMO.


message 9: by Ashley (new)

Ashley is there a kate curran type romance brewing in this series?


carol. (not getting notifications) Ashley wrote: "is there a kate curran type romance brewing in this series?"

Ashley, just in case others care, I'll spoil it (view spoiler)


message 11: by Mimi (new) - added it

Mimi On a scale of Kate to Mercy/October Daye, where would you say Jane fall? Closer to Kate or the other two? And does the series improve with each book? I'm trying to decide how much time and energy to set aside for this book in case it doesn't out.


carol. (not getting notifications) Less consistent of a series. Closer to Kate, for sure.

However, Hunter commits the foul of a two-way love interest (or three). I do enjoy the Native angle and the issues of identity Jane struggles with. Most people seem to dislike the "Beast-speak" in book one, but it settles down and is more human-like in the rest of the books. Jane is definitely of the kick-ass school of investigation, while October's is often the whiney approach.

On the carol scale of ownership, I was insta-buying Hunter until the fourth book, when I stopped. I need to pick the series up again--I feel like it might have had a U-curve in writing. I might have bought one October Daye book.


message 13: by Mimi (new) - added it

Mimi Okay, thanks! Definitely bumping this one up the list. Mercy and October made me weary about trying other similar UF series, but this one sounds good. I like the kick-ass heroine investigator angle, not too keen on the multiple love interest thing, but I could overlook it if everything else in on par. Since you rated the later books favorably, I'll take that as a sign.


Wanda Pedersen I met the author at a conference back in August--nice to hear that her (somewhat quirky) sense of humour shines through in her work. Next chance I have for fluff, this book may be the one!


carol. (not getting notifications) well, I'll be interested in what you two think, if you get to Jane Yellowrock. :)


Lindsay I've read all of each of those series, Mercy Thompson, October Daye and Jane Yellowrock. I would actually put Jane more in the line of Laurell K. Hamilton's Anita Blake, but much better written and mostly without all the sexual content. Certainly the gun-porn elements of the two are very similar. There are bits that I would describe as fan-fiction as written by the NRA.

I'm not that bothered regarding Jane's love life. Beast is a larger part of her than is immediately apparent and as Jane often points out, big cats do not pair off.

The series as a whole is pretty good but there are times that I really don't understand Jane's interactions with the vampires and Leo in particular. That relationship seems to be whatever the author wants it to be in any given moment rather than a consistent writing over the entire series.

There are also two problems you often see with long-running open-ended UF series: escalating power level and filler books. Every one of these series is guilty of that and these are no exception. The fifth book Death's Rival is pivotal and the resolution to the elements in that story is incredibly sparse, so the next book should be equally pivotal. Instead she literally takes Jane on a whole book excursion out of the city.


carol. (not getting notifications) Lindsay wrote: "That relationship seems to be whatever the author wants it to be in any given moment rather than a consistent writing over the entire."

This ^ You've hit on one of my most significant problems with the series. Rather than feeling like a developmental issue (is she discovering her identity? building intimacy?), I feel like Jane often does what Hunter needs her to do to advance a plot or weave in a plot point.


Lindsay Yes, I think Hunter backs herself into corners at times. Jane is mostly a very uncompromising character and there are several situations that she is placed in that her most logical response would be to quite literally wipe out all vampires in the southern US.


message 19: by Lyn (last edited Jun 27, 2016 06:25PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Lyn ANOTHER outstanding review. I'm reading it now and am already trying NOT to plagiarize your review. That's tough when you are always so darn spot on. I'm digging it, making comparisons to Kevin Hearne's Iron Druid books, and generally liking a bad-ass woman protagonist in a UF mold.


carol. (not getting notifications) Thank you, Lyn! I'm glad you are enjoying it--like Lindsay, I enjoyed much of the series but just had trouble with the character continuity. It worked best for me when there was a long delay between reads :) I did love the parts sprinkled through it about her re-discovering her Native upbringing.


message 21: by Erica (new)

Erica I didn't even get past the first page (partly because it seemed like it was heading in that direction) because of phrases like "jean clad thighs".


carol. (not getting notifications) Fair enough, Erica. I took a nice long break between books because of the paranormal romance feel. The multi-book storylines don't act on it immediately, which is unusual, but still feel very paranormal at times. To be fair, I think the writing in the second improves a bit, especially Beast's voice, but I can see where 'jean clad thighs' would be a warning sign :)


Jennifer I didn't love this one, but I wonder if I gave it a fair shot. My interest in this series started when I heard of a mashup between this series and CE Walker's Walker Files, which I love. I started The Walker Files at book 6 and wasn't particularly impressed by book 1 when I went back to it, so clearly Murphy figured out some things about her characters and world and plotting in the meantime. Maybe I should jump ahead to book 6 of this series. :-)


carol. (not getting notifications) I know when I read it the first time, I had real trouble with the Beast voice and what looked like the typical love triangle starting to shape up. But shapeshifters are rare in UF, Native Americans even rarer, Jane does seem quite kick-ass, and the writing was decent, so I stuck with it.

I've had an up and down relationship with the books, partly because Hunter does like to bring in sexual conflict, and partly because she's also chosen to focus many of the books on Jane and a master vampire, with the strong will-she/won't she undertones that I found eye-rolling. Vamps just don't do it for me any more.

I liked Book 2, so you could always give that a try. But, we also have an 82% similarity in books, and I never finished the series. So there you go :)


Jennifer Carol. wrote: "Vamps just don't do it for me any more"

Hah! Same here. It's been a long time since I was 14 and thought Jean Claude was the epitome of sexiness.


message 27: by Mir (new)

Mir Jennifer wrote: "Carol. wrote: "Vamps just don't do it for me any more"

Hah! Same here. It's been a long time since I was 14 and thought Jean Claude was the epitome of sexiness."


He was so icky!


message 28: by Debi (new) - rated it 4 stars

Debi I am looking for a good series. I love Sharon Shinn, Robin Hobbs, Ilona Andrew's. Any suggestions?


message 29: by Debi (new) - rated it 4 stars

Debi Bought this book. Am off vamps though. Sunshine by McKinley is my favorite vamp novel.


back to top