Cornwall, 1917. After the death of his father, fifteen-year-old Simon Lysaght is sent to live with his uncle, Sir David Trevelyan, at their estate house, Trevelyan Priors. His uncle is an imposing man and Simon feels ill at ease in this large and forbidding house. On his first day he discovers there have been a number of family suicides and his cousin William, who is crippled and bed-ridden, warns him never to wander the corridors after dark. While exploring the grounds after a day of heavy snow, Simon discovers a track of fresh footprints in an enclosed garden, long abandoned and overgrows. Who do they belong to, and how did they get there? Simon can see no answer, until one day weeks later when he encounters a girl of his own age in the garden. They strike up a friendship, but doubts remain in Simon’s mind. And when he discovers a sinister secret in his uncle’s library, Simon is soon to find that Trevelyan Priors and its inhabitants have much to hide and more ! to tell than he can guess. A chilling, compelling page-turner, 'A Garden Lost in Time' is guaranteed to send shivers down your spine.
Jonathan Aycliffe (Denis M. MacEoin) was born in Belfast in 1949. He studied English, Persian, Arabic and Islamic studies at the universities of Dublin, Edinburgh and Cambridge, and lectured at the universities of Fez in Morocco and Newcastle upon Tyne. The author of several successful full-length ghost stories, he lives in the north of England with his wife, homeopath and health writer, Beth MacEoin. He also writes as Daniel Easterman, under which name he has penned nine bestselling novels.
Another Aycliffe haunted house special, this time set mainly in 1917 in Cornwall and partly in 1994 as an elderly Simon Lysaght faces up to a final visit to the house he had lived in as a 15 year old following the death of his father in the Great War. The story is told in a montage of diary entries, letters and reports from a number of the protagonists, which draw both the narrative and the history of the house together. There are a number of suitably sinister characters and the usual ghostly goings - on and, always in the background a Lovecraftian menace from something old and evil awakened by the occult practices of the Trevelyans. And for romantics there is a love story - albeit one where one of the young lovers has been dead for some time!
Somehow I just can't give any book by Jonathan Aycliffe any less than five stars. To me he is the master of the scary tale, no one does it better. This book is no exception. From the start he sucks you in and you literally see all that he is describing. It makes you experience the story rather than just 'read' it. I see the house, I see the garden, I see the terrible thing sitting on the bed and I hear the scratching sounds. If you want a real chilling experience choose ANY book by Jonathan Aycliffe
2.5 stars maybe? Even a mediocre Aycliffe novel is still a decent ghost story. This is definitely my least favorite of his books so far; it was slow to start and had too many loose ends/unexplained plot elements for my taste. Still, Aycliffe is the master of the English ghost story, and there were a few passages here that I found spooky (the library especially).
I really enjoyed this atmospheric and admittedly, flawed, book. The plot is certainly two fold; basically it's about a young boy who goes to live with his extended family in a high class estate...that is haunted. The other part of the story deals with the horrors of war, as it is set in Cornwall, UK during the First World War.
The problem is that the story shifts themes and situations quite regularly, as it is all written in the first person via journal entries and letters. I think the author was trying to connect real life horror with that of a fictional spookiness, and as for the atmosphere is concerned, it actually works. However for the reader, the double life of the story can become disjointed and almost boring.
Sometimes this doesn't feel like a ghost story, but when it does, like with all Aycliffe's novels, it commands a sense of terror and dread. There was even one part of the story that was not unlike Lovecraft. It all kind of makes sense at the end, although there were some loose ends that were not tied up.
The middle of this book sagged a little, but overall, I would recommend this. It's not a terribly long read and once you start you'll find yourself drawn into its world.
Though I always enjoy Mr. Aycliffe's writing style, I think this is one of his weaker books. I found several inconsistencies that seem purely accidental, including a complete passage that gets repeated nearly word-for-word later in the book. This is a multiple narrator story told through letters and journal entries, and at times you get the sense that certain parts of this book were written as stand-alone short stories about a haunted house. I suspect the author drew a bunch of notes together and threaded a storyline through them at the last moment to call this a novel. Nothing quite hangs together, a sense of menace never really accumulates, and the ending is unconvincing.
Still, it was compelling enough that I read it in a single day. I'm glad I ordered it used off Amazon--it came to me from a library in Wales, with Welsh language stamps and markings inside the front cover. Talk about getting a sense of authenticity...
I enjoy Aycliffe's ghost stories, but as other reviewers have stated while A Garden Lost in Time offers the creepies, chills and frissons of the Gothic, there are many unanswered questions, loose ends, inconsistencies, and an ending that is just too ...well, "happily ever after" for my taste. Enjoyed the journey, but left cold at the end.
I love this author, the writing is flawless, you feel the emotions of the characters, and after you put the book down you may find yourself questioning the shadows that fall at night.
Very creepy and truly frightening in some scenes. A lot of loose ends, though; some things are never explained. I will read more from this author; very good writing.
Though the prose itself is fine, the inconsistencies and loose ends are incredibly irritating and nonsensical. It’s as though Aycliffe just threw down his ideas in a torrent, changing his mind willy-nilly without bothering about coherence.
There are too many strands to the plot and some of those strands are simply left hanging. Mostly, there are events that have nothing to with the hauntings and serve no real purpose in the story. Also, some of the hauntings seem pretty random and unrelated to what eventually becomes the main plot thread.
There’s a whole lot of telling with very little showing and there are some issues with how the author seems to understand age - a 15 year old is not a child. There are general lapses of logic.
Some of the silly, but incessant inconsistencies:
A character we’re told at the beginning is 43 we’re later told is 39. A character we’re told is 10 is later said to be 8. The main character is mistakenly referred to by another character’s name more than once. There is a mistake with another character’s name. A whole passage from the middle of the novel is repeated word for word toward the end of the novel. A character says that his door doesn’t lock only to lock it a few pages later.
And there are more...
A good editor might have salvaged this by making it less annoying and by tightening up the plot. Overall it feels as though it was thrown together carelessly in order to publish it quickly.
I love ghost stories, especially traditional gothic ghost stories and Jonathan Aycliffe is a master at writing things-that-go-bump-in-the-night. Somehow I just discovered him about a year ago and if I didn't pace myself, I would be happy to read everything he has written one after the other. This is the third book of his I have read and while I loved it and the story was sheer perfection as usual, the writing was a bit lacking and the pacing was off with some long passages that did not add to the story. So I am giving it 4 rather than 5 stars, and I am already eager to read my next Aycliffe book.
It was ok. I expected a better book to read, but instead I found myself drifting away from the reading. Just my opinion. This won't discourage me from reading his other books.