Is it better to be poor and happy or rich and careworn? In this charming fable by La Fontaine, adapted by Bernadette Watts, a cheerful shoemaker finds his own answer to this question when his wealthy neighbor tempts him with unimaginable riches.
A happy-go-lucky shoe-maker's life is changed for the worse when a wealthy neighbor gives him a bag of gold. I can't get enough of Wildsmith's sumptuous artwork.
The Rich Man and the Shoemaker was a classic tale of how the rich try to solve their problems. They always feel like they are being annoyed by the happiness of others so they try to manipulate them, in their own cunning ways, to get what they want. In this case peace and quiet. However, when the shoemaker recieves the bag of gold from the rich man his worries only begin to start. He no longer sings because of his paranoia, which makes the rich man happy and the poor man sad. In the end riches never made man happy, it is all a state of mind.
This book really shows how beauty lies in simple things, such as in singing and being surrounded by children. Things we think can give us happiness, like gold, can sometimes even be the source of our worry. Money can't buy happiness :)
What a great way to teach money doesn't bring happiness. Even the rich man wasn't happy, he had no songs in his life, no family, only fortune. The shoemaker was happy with what he had, he didn't need all the gold, even if it meant more food for his family. He was humble and had all he needed, a job he loved, a home, and a family. The rich man did not understand that because he only had money, he did not understand happiness. Books with morals are a great way to show different ways of thinking, and how they can relate to our own life. I did not like the ending, it kind of left the reader hanging. The shoemaker was happy when he returned home without money, but how the rich man felt was not explained, the story just ended. I would read it to my little one though, it was a good story.
Something about this reminds me too much of Sponge-Bob and Squidward.... I dunno. The tale is slight and unsatisfying, and the art is rather specific to its era imo. And what's wrong with a compromise?
Nice illustrations for this fable. I believe it is one of Aesop's fables?
A poor shoemaker gets some gold from a rich man. The poor shoemaker becomes so worried about the gold that he loses his joy for life. He returns the gold to the rich man and becomes happy again.
I think the shoemaker should have spent the gold on a big party for his friends! :-)
Loved the story and the message. But it's hard to imagine the illustrations being more badly drawn. I can't figure out all these awful illustrations are supposed to be stylized, or if the illustrators really do draw like ten-year-olds.