What do you think?
Rate this book
Proza Historyczna
Niniejszy tom stanowi drugą, po Poetyce pisarstwa historycznego (2000), antologię tekstów Haydena White'a. Autor kontynuuje i rozwija odważną dyskusję nad jednym z kluczowych problemów teorii historiografii: relacją między historią i literaturą oraz zdarzeniem i faktem, podważając sposób myślenia o nich w kategoriach binarnych opozycji. Rozważając status historiografii jako dyskursu oraz podkreślając jej aspekt literacki, White udowadnia, że współczesna teoria literatury jest niezbędna do analiz pisarstwa historycznego. Przewijające się pojęcia fikcji, narracji, narratywizacji, fabularyzacji, tropów i tropologii oraz realizmu stają się kluczowymi kategoriami dla odkrywania i analiz poetyckiego i retorycznego wymiaru tego typu pisarstwa. White ukazuje, jak metaforyczny język tworzy wyobrażenia przedmiotów badawczych niedostępnych bezpośredniej percepcji, zmienia je w podmioty dyskursu i nadaje im aurę "realności". Literacki aspekt pisarstwa historycznego nie dotyczy zatem stylu, ale sposobów nadawania znaczeń przeszłym wydarzeniom, co odbywa się poprzez narrarywizację czy fabularyzację oraz figurację, to znaczy narzucanie na przeszłe wydarzenia znaczeń, które znamy z opowieści i literackich toposów. Stąd tropologia rozumiana jako teoria figuracji i dyskursywnej fabularyzacji staje się podstawowym narzędziem sposobów nadawania tych znaczeń, a w konsekwencji najważniejszą metodą analizy pisarstwa historycznego.
SPIS TREŚCI
Podziękowania
Przedmowa
Teoria literatury i pisarstwo historyczne
Literatura a fikcja
Fikcjonalność przedstawień opartych na faktach
Stare pytanie postawione na nowo: czy historiografia jest sztuką czy nauką? (Odpowiedź Iggersowi)
Historiografia jako narracja
Koniec historiografii narracyjnej
Fikcja historyczna, historia fikcjonalna i rzeczywistość historyczna
Realizm figuralny w literaturze świadectwa
Przeciw realizmowi historycznemu. Czytając Wojnę i pokój
Zdarzenie historyczne
Zdarzenie modernistyczne
Ewa Domańska. Przyczynek do biografii intelektualnej Haydena White'a
Nota edytorska
Hayden White. Bibliografia prac w języku angielskim (1998-2008)
Indeks nazwisk
Indeks pojęć
SPIS TREŚCI
Podziękowania
Przedmowa
Teoria literatury i pisarstwo historyczne
Literatura a fikcja
Fikcjonalność przedstawień opartych na faktach
Stare pytanie postawione na nowo: czy historiografia jest sztuką czy nauką? (Odpowiedź Iggersowi)
Historiografia jako narracja
Koniec historiografii narracyjnej
Fikcja historyczna, historia fikcjonalna i rzeczywistość historyczna
Realizm figuralny w literaturze świadectwa
Przeciw realizmowi historycznemu. Czytając Wojnę i pokój
Zdarzenie historyczne
Zdarzenie modernistyczne
Ewa Domańska. Przyczynek do biografii intelektualnej Haydena White'a
Nota edytorska
Hayden White. Bibliografia prac w języku angielskim (1998-2008)
Indeks nazwisk
Indeks pojęć
- GenresAnthropology
356 pages, Paperback
Published January 1, 2009
About the author
Hayden White
47 books48 followersHayden White was a historian in the tradition of literary criticism, perhaps most famous for his work Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (1973). He was professor emeritus at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and held position of professor of comparative literature at Stanford University.
White received his B.A. from Wayne State University in 1951 and his M.A. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Michigan (1952 and 1956, respectively). While an undergraduate at Wayne State, White studied history under William J. Bossenbrook, who inspired several undergraduates who later went on to achieve academic distinction in the field of history, including White, H. D. "Harry" Harootunian, and Arthur C. Danto (The Uses of History).
Hayden V. White has made contributions to the philosophy of history and literary theory. His books and essays analyze the narratives of nineteenth-and twentieth-century historians and philosophers, suggesting that historical discourse is a form of fiction that can be classified and studied on the basis of its structure and its use of language. White ultimately attacks the notion that modern history texts present objective, accurate explanations of the past; instead, he argues that historians and philosophers operate under unarticulated assumptions in arranging, selecting, and interpreting events. These assumptions, White asserts, can be identified by examining the form and structure of texts themselves, providing valuable information about the attitudes of the author and the context in which he or she has written. Furthermore, as White postulates in Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, historical discourse can be classified into the literary patterns of tragedy, comedy, romance, and irony.
In a review in the Journal of Modern History, Allan Megill wrote: "Taken together, White's books and essays have done much to alter the theory of history. Although his focus on trope and narrative is far from what most historians are interested in, they are all aware of his work." The critic added that White "is able to speak fluently and interestingly on an astonishingly wide variety of matters."
Most scholars agree that White's most important work is Metahistory. The book grew out of its author's interest in the reasons why people study—and write—history. Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor Frank Day observed that in Metahistory White "adapted ideas from Giambattista Vico and other students of rhetoric and literary history to produce an intricate analysis of nineteenth-century historians in terms of their methods of emplotment. . . . White's broad purpose in Metahistory is to trace how the nineteenth-century historians escaped from the Irony that dominated Enlightenment historiography and from the 'irresponsible faith' of the Romantics, only to lapse back into Irony at the end of the century." The implications for historians and literary theoreticians lay in the "application of rhetorical tropes to narrative discourse," to quote Day.
White received his B.A. from Wayne State University in 1951 and his M.A. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Michigan (1952 and 1956, respectively). While an undergraduate at Wayne State, White studied history under William J. Bossenbrook, who inspired several undergraduates who later went on to achieve academic distinction in the field of history, including White, H. D. "Harry" Harootunian, and Arthur C. Danto (The Uses of History).
Hayden V. White has made contributions to the philosophy of history and literary theory. His books and essays analyze the narratives of nineteenth-and twentieth-century historians and philosophers, suggesting that historical discourse is a form of fiction that can be classified and studied on the basis of its structure and its use of language. White ultimately attacks the notion that modern history texts present objective, accurate explanations of the past; instead, he argues that historians and philosophers operate under unarticulated assumptions in arranging, selecting, and interpreting events. These assumptions, White asserts, can be identified by examining the form and structure of texts themselves, providing valuable information about the attitudes of the author and the context in which he or she has written. Furthermore, as White postulates in Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, historical discourse can be classified into the literary patterns of tragedy, comedy, romance, and irony.
In a review in the Journal of Modern History, Allan Megill wrote: "Taken together, White's books and essays have done much to alter the theory of history. Although his focus on trope and narrative is far from what most historians are interested in, they are all aware of his work." The critic added that White "is able to speak fluently and interestingly on an astonishingly wide variety of matters."
Most scholars agree that White's most important work is Metahistory. The book grew out of its author's interest in the reasons why people study—and write—history. Dictionary of Literary Biography contributor Frank Day observed that in Metahistory White "adapted ideas from Giambattista Vico and other students of rhetoric and literary history to produce an intricate analysis of nineteenth-century historians in terms of their methods of emplotment. . . . White's broad purpose in Metahistory is to trace how the nineteenth-century historians escaped from the Irony that dominated Enlightenment historiography and from the 'irresponsible faith' of the Romantics, only to lapse back into Irony at the end of the century." The implications for historians and literary theoreticians lay in the "application of rhetorical tropes to narrative discourse," to quote Day.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
No one has reviewed this book yet.