How might the GOP's Afghanistan report impact the presidential race?
House Republicans are blaming the Biden administration, but the White House is pushing back
House Republicans released a report on Sept. 9 excoriating President Joe Biden and his administration for the United States' deadly 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal, while congressional Democrats quickly came to the defense of the White House. Now, the debate has led some to wonder whether the GOP's report will affect the presidential race between the Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Republican nominee, former President Donald Trump.
The report, published by the Republican-led House Foreign Affairs Committee, claimed that the Biden-Harris administration "misled and, in some instances, directly lied to the American people at every stage of the withdrawal, from before the go-to-zero order until today." The report is "about getting to the bottom of what happened so we can make sure it never happens again," Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), the chair of the committee, said in a statement.
The information in the report created a "predetermined, partisan narrative about the Afghanistan withdrawal," said the committee's ranking member, Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), in a memorandum. It was part of "Republicans' partisan attempts to garner headlines," said Meeks, further noting that the report went to "particular pains to avoid facts involving former President Trump" and his role in the Afghanistan withdrawal. The White House similarly released a statement denouncing the report. But could the partisan nature of the report play a role in November?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the commentators say?
Republicans have "frequently criticized" Biden for how his administration "handled the evacuation," and the report's release came just a day before the first presidential debate between Harris and Trump, said Luke Garrett at NPR. Harris is "mentioned 28 times in the report's executive summary, while Trump's name is cited twice." However, despite criticism of Biden, Democrats have noted that it was Trump who "set the withdrawal in motion when his administration made a widely criticized deal with the Taliban in 2020," known as the Doha Agreement.
The release of the report "signaled a strategy that the GOP plans to keep the debate over how America ended its longest war at the top of voters' minds this fall," said Jesus Mesa at Newsweek. Trump and his allies have "tried to make the chaotic events of August 2021 stick" to Harris. Trump will argue that even if Harris was not "directly involved in the withdrawal decisions, leaving billions of dollars in equipment behind and losing soldiers' lives makes them unfit to lead as commander-in-chief," former New York state legislator and political analyst Joshua Lafazan said to Newsweek.
But the "good news for the Democratic nominee is that, at least so far, the issue ranks far behind other more pressing concerns around immigration and the economy," Mesa said. Tying Harris to Afghanistan "isn't as potent a line of attack as the GOP thinks it is," Republican strategist Alex Patton said to Newsweek. Beyond this, Trump's "push to capitalize politically on the withdrawal has also boomeranged on him," Robbie Gramer and Joe Gould said at Politico. The Harris campaign and others have "criticized Trump over reports that Trump's campaign staff got into a confrontation with an official at the Arlington National Cemetery." It remains an "open question whether the inquiry into decisions made under Biden's leadership will transfer into a political liability for Harris."
What next?
The GOP report also recommended several other points to avoid future incidents like Afghanistan. This includes a "focus on making future non-combatant evacuation operations (NEO) successful, calling for Congress to put into place standard operating procedures for such a drawdown and requirements for the State Department and DOD to brief Congress on NEO plans when an embassy has been designated as a high threat post," said CNN.
But beyond Trump or Biden, the botched withdrawal was a result of "decades of mistakes," said Nick Schifrin at PBS News. Both "Iraq and early Pentagon decisions meant a lack of early U.S. investment in Afghanistan." Other factors that played a role include "counterterrorism rates that killed the very people that the U.S. was trying to protect," as well as "Obama's surge with an end date," Pakistan's "safe haven for the Taliban," and "Afghan corruption," said Schifrin. The full list of reasons for U.S. problems in Afghanistan is "very long."
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Justin Klawans has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022. He began his career covering local news before joining Newsweek as a breaking news reporter, where he wrote about politics, national and global affairs, business, crime, sports, film, television and other Hollywood news. Justin has also freelanced for outlets including Collider and United Press International.
-
8 award-winning restaurants to visit this fall
It's the season for dropping magazine restaurant and chef awards
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - September 18, 2024
Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons - high concept, violent rhetoric, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Unplugged: digital detox cabins offer an escape from the grid and the grind
The Week Recommends Tech-free retreats in the British countryside give guests a chance to switch off
By Kate Lucy, The Week UK Published
-
Slain journalists are getting a one-of-a-kind memorial
In the Spotlight The memorial will be located on the National Mall in Washington, D.C.
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
'Musk could receive some attention from federal law enforcement'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
NYC Mayor Adams' administration may be in big trouble
High-profile defections and ongoing federal scrutiny have called into question how — and even if — the mayor of New York City can continue to govern
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump assassination attempt: do former presidents need more protection?
Today's Big Question Secret Service director says 'paradigm shift' needed after second Trump attack sparks calls for more resources
By The Week UK Published
-
What has Kamala Harris done as vice president?
In Depth It's not uncommon for the second-in-command to struggle to prove themselves in a role largely defined by behind-the-scenes work
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
'If this is a race, China has a commanding lead'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How the far-right media bubble failed Donald Trump
By ensconcing himself in the comfort of friendly — and increasingly conspiracy-driven — media, the former president is stuck in a feedback loop of his own making
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Ohio governor slams attacks on Haitian migrants
Speed Read Mike DeWine condemned the conspiracies boosted by Donald Trump and JD Vance about immigrants eating people's pets
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published