Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion, though only stewards may use {{yes}} or {{no}} templates.
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rollback for Trijnstel
- Global user: Trijnstel (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I'm sysop on nl.wikipedia and editing since 2005 overthere. During RC patrolling on nl.wiki I often check for cross-wiki vandalism. One of the things I do is checking the edits of sockpuppets and "discovering" new ones. As sysop I'm used to work with the rollback function and it would make is so much easier for me for reverting vandalism. I monitor #cvn-sw for a couple of months now and have edits on more than 100 wikis. Therefore I've gained a lot of experience and see very easily what vandalism is and what not. If you have any further questions, please let me know. Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Trijnstel 23:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support, although not yet so many edits she is available on IRC and so helps out on #cvn-sw. Furthermore, rollback is no big deal. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support & thanks for helping. --dferg ☎ talk 23:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Damn ,i was going to be teh first supporter Mardetanha talk 23:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, a hard worker, enough cross-wiki experience and trusty - Hoo man (talk) 23:14, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- {{yes}} Dolledre 23:27, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- {{yes}}--Vituzzu 23:39, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Damn, those green flags are only for steward. :-P —DerHexer (Talk) 23:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - No trouble trusting this user with global rollback, is active and no doubt would use it. Ajraddatz 04:00, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support. Seen this user around, and can't see any problems. Jafeluv 04:33, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- ' Support' of course. MoiraMoira 06:49, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - JZ85 11:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes --Dalibor Bosits © 11:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, per above -- Quentinv57 (talk) 12:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - WinContro 19:04, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Does good vandal fighting work Olivier Bommel 19:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Does good work :) Apoo 19:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Sure. --Erwin 21:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 02:52, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 06:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support by –BruTe talk 07:43, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Sure! -Barras 15:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Sure --WizardOfOz talk 15:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Has my trust. Avicennasis 21:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support for sure - An ambitious girl with a huge hart for Wikimedia and all of its projects. Fontes 23:07, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Extremely trustable user. Savh 08:43, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support. JenVan (talk) 09:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Good suggestion. -- Tegel 10:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 16:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Promoted, clear consensus. --dferg ☎ talk 11:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Global rollback for Avicennasis
- Global user: Avicennasis (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I would like to present myself for Global Rollback. I am an active member of the SWMT, and I am often on IRC in the related channels. I am an admin on both the Scots Wikipedia (verfiy) and the Strategy Wiki (verfiy), and I understand the GR policy. While I sometimes contribute to different language wikis, I understand that GR is granted only for anti-vandalism reasons, and not content issues. Thanks for your consideration. Avicennasis 02:38, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support, why not (enough activity, trusted) - Hoo man (talk) 15:12, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 21:30, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Don't know the user but I can't find any reasons to be against. Fontes 23:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I see you reverting vandalism across many wikis regularly, and have no reason not to trust you with these rights. Ajraddatz 17:52, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support I see no problem. –BruTe talk 17:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
| <translate>
Global sysop for MoiraMoira
- Global user: MoiraMoira (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I am a sysop since 2006 on nl-wikipedia and am active with vandalism control and cross wiki vandalism for many years. As a global rollbacker I am active also reverting cross wiki linkspam, vandalism and revert edits from long time vandals. I ask for global sysop to be able to also remove vandal pages from cross wiki vandals and also to enable me to fight and check upon cross wiki long time vandals recurring in a better way. MoiraMoira 07:04, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Question: I'm inclined to support, but could you explain why you made this revert? Jafeluv 07:13, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- a cross wiki vandal that drives everybody crazy (what is still right becomes a puzzle for all of us btw due to the many sockpuppets and some additions right and others outright wrong!) - the version I checked upon proper spelling and content and was the better one (earlier removals restored and all names no longer wrongly spelled with strange capitals, this was a Dutch popgroup/singer). MoiraMoira 07:24, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm aware of the sockpuppeteer behind this. However, it seems you accidentally restored some contentious text added by one of his socks in the process. And as far as I can tell the edit you reverted was an administrator cleaning up after him. Jafeluv 07:52, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes that is why I checked and found the version restored to was a faulty one with wrong names. Collgeague Trijnstel's version (she did the extensive filing on this specific vandal) I restored - as you can see the one chosen contains wrong names. How ever - once all the sockpuppets are rolled up I guess the articles need careful checking anyway what is wrong, right or nonsense since it is a total mess nowadays alas. The one part which was wrong happily has been deleted ITMT I saw. MoiraMoira 07:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, thanks for the explanation. In general I've seen good work from you and will gladly support this request. Jafeluv 08:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes that is why I checked and found the version restored to was a faulty one with wrong names. Collgeague Trijnstel's version (she did the extensive filing on this specific vandal) I restored - as you can see the one chosen contains wrong names. How ever - once all the sockpuppets are rolled up I guess the articles need careful checking anyway what is wrong, right or nonsense since it is a total mess nowadays alas. The one part which was wrong happily has been deleted ITMT I saw. MoiraMoira 07:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm aware of the sockpuppeteer behind this. However, it seems you accidentally restored some contentious text added by one of his socks in the process. And as far as I can tell the edit you reverted was an administrator cleaning up after him. Jafeluv 07:52, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- a cross wiki vandal that drives everybody crazy (what is still right becomes a puzzle for all of us btw due to the many sockpuppets and some additions right and others outright wrong!) - the version I checked upon proper spelling and content and was the better one (earlier removals restored and all names no longer wrongly spelled with strange capitals, this was a Dutch popgroup/singer). MoiraMoira 07:24, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support, green flag! —DerHexer (Talk) 10:34, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - handels a lot of the crosswiki abuse affairs on nl.wikipedia JZ85 10:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support I'm fine with it. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 12:22, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support --dferg ☎ talk 12:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support definitely --Herby talk thyme 14:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- ��Support --Jyothis 15:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Yes please Mardetanha talk 15:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - WinContro 19:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Does good vandal fighting work Olivier Bommel 19:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Ofcourse! Apoo 19:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes--Dalibor Bosits © 19:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Of course --Trijnstel 19:22, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, enough cross-wiki experience and trusty - Hoo man (talk) 20:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Of course Elfix 20:38, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Sure. --Erwin 21:03, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 07:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support by –BruTe talk 07:44, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Pleased to support. --Mercy 09:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Sure! -Barras 15:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support --WizardOfOz talk 15:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Vituzzu 15:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - But please don't become a total no-lifer, turn the pc off once in a while ;-) Fontes 23:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Don't see why not. Ajraddatz 00:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Lymantria 08:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, one of the most reliable admins I know. Mathonius 12:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Per Mathonius. EdBever 12:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support without a shadow of a doubt. oscar 13:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Requests for global editinterface permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/GEI-Header
Requests for global IP block exemption
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
| <translate>
Global IP block exempt for Paul 1953
- Global user: Paul_1953 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
I do not quite understand why my IP has been globally blocked. I am currently unable to edit on Wikipedia due to this block.
According to whatismyip.com, my IP Address is 58.146.174.149. According to my computer however, my IP Address is 192.168.2.4. Thanks, --Paul 1953
- Odd, according to stalktoy for 58.146.174.149 there's no global block that would affect that IP. The 192.168.2.4 address is a local network address which isn't used on the internet - One is assigned to systems on home networks by the router, for instance. Let's see what some others think about this ... I probably just missed something in my first check. Kylu 13:46, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe he means 202.156.14.10? [1] That IP is globally blocked. Jafeluv 13:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- See? Missed something. Kylu 14:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe he means 202.156.14.10? [1] That IP is globally blocked. Jafeluv 13:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- 192.168.2.4 is your internal IP-address (within your home Network), 58.146.174.149 is the IP address that is used for the Internet (so the relevant one). But 58.146.174.149 has neither a global block (1) or a local block on enwiki (1) on it (it even hasn't got any contributions 1), so it might be the wrong IP address (the IP address you made this contribution with has been globally blocked (1), so I presume it's the right one). But that doesn't really matter.
- Notice: To receive a global flag you need a global account account - Hoo man (talk) 13:49, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- On the other hand, if you only edit enwiki you can request local IP block exemption there. No need for a global flag. Jafeluv 14:16, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Paul 1953 here. I can't edit my talk page. By the way, reason given for block was open proxy. 14:32, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- I've given you local exemption on the English Wikipedia. PeterSymonds 17:02, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- Paul 1953 here. I can't edit my talk page. By the way, reason given for block was open proxy. 14:32, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- On the other hand, if you only edit enwiki you can request local IP block exemption there. No need for a global flag. Jafeluv 14:16, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation