Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/SPQRobin: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Niesy74 (talk | contribs)
25 edits
Voted yes
Voted yes
Line 91: Line 91:
# {{Se-vote|2014|Midnight Gambler|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Midnight Gambler|Midnight Gambler]] ([[User talk:Midnight Gambler|talk]]) 20:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2014|Midnight Gambler|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Midnight Gambler|Midnight Gambler]] ([[User talk:Midnight Gambler|talk]]) 20:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2014|Niesy74|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Niesy74|Niesy74]] ([[User talk:Niesy74|talk]]) 20:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2014|Niesy74|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Niesy74|Niesy74]] ([[User talk:Niesy74|talk]]) 20:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2014|Oscar|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Oscar|oscar]] ([[User talk:Oscar|talk]]) 21:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


==== {{sr-heading|no}} ====
==== {{sr-heading|no}} ====

Revision as of 21:27, 10 February 2014

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

SPQRobin (Robin Pepermans)

ContentsYes • No • Neutral

SPQRobin talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

  • Languages: nl-N, en-3, fr-2, de-2
  • Personal info: I started editing the Dutch Wikipedia back in 2006. Later I became active on MetaWiki and the Wikimedia Incubator, primarily to help the creation of new language versions, which has given me experience with small language communities. Consequently I became a member of the Language Committee. To help me with cross-wiki tasks, I became a global sysop in 2011. I have also been an active MediaWiki developer, primarily for internationalisation of the software, for which I have been active on translatewiki.net as well. I have also been active on projects like the English Wikipedia, English Wiktionary, … Nowadays I am also active on Wikidata (where I am an administrator). I was reluctant to run for steward because I have not been as active lately on Meta-related tasks and issues as I would like to be, but fellow Wikimedians convinced me to submit my candidacy anyway because of my experience in the Wikimedia projects. I think this makes sense; it is more important that others can trust a steward and are sure that he will use the tools wisely regardless of the level of activity. I hope others feel so about me; and in any case I plan to become more active again from now on. I will help with handling steward requests where possible, as well as be available on the IRC channel for help. I agree to abide by the policies governing steward access, checkuser access, oversight access, and privacy. Thank you for your consideration.

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#SPQRobin


Yes

  2. Ebe123 (Verification pending) •  ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vogone (Verification pending) •  The global community would certainly benefit from having him in the steward team. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. MF-Warburg (Verification pending) •  I think that SPQRobin with his years-long experience on WMF wikis, especially in the „global level“, will be a very good steward, with common sense and a thorough knowledge of policies and practices. MF-W 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. PiRSquared17 (Verification pending) •  Even though he has been inactive as a global sysop, I think that he can be trusted and has at least enough experience dealing with cross-wiki issues. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. John F. Lewis (Verification pending) •  I have not seen SPQRobin around all too much but I know they are going to use the tools in a way to benefit the whole project. I do partially echo what Snowolf said however. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Alan (Verification pending) •  Alan (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. JurriaanH (Verification pending) •  JurriaanH (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Érico Júnior Wouters (Verification pending) •  Érico Wouters msg 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Wiki13 (Verification pending) •  Wiki13 talk 18:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. İncelemeelemani (Verification pending) •  İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Brateevsky (Verification pending) •  Brateevsky (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Rschen7754 (Verification pending) •  Rschen7754 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. JurgenNL (Verification pending) •  JurgenNL (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. DerHexer (Verification pending) •  Hooray! —DerHexer (Talk) 19:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. 분당선M (Verification pending) •  DangSunM (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ralgis (Verification pending) •  --Allan Aguilar • /t/ 19:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Guycn2 (Verification pending) •  Guycn2 (talk) 20:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Stryn (Verification pending) •  Stryn (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. D Eaketts (Verification pending) •  D Eaketts (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Stefan Knauf (Verification pending) •  Stefan Knauf (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Sjoerddebruin (Verification pending) •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Davey2010 (Verification pending) •  →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Legoktm (Verification pending) •  Legoktm (talk) 22:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Nemo bis (Verification pending) •  About time! Thanks to whoever managed to convince him. SPQRobin has always been a precious asset for all things cross-wiki, small/new-wiki and interlanguage/multilingual/internationalisation... Could go on for hours. Any finger he'll be able to lend to stewards activities will be a gain, please however leave him some time for MediaWiki too because I don't want to do without him there either. Nemo 22:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Trijnstel (Verification pending) •  Not very active, but on the other hand has experience with small and new communities. Let's give him a chance. Trijnsteltalk 22:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Danny B. (Verification pending) •  Working with small and new communities is a big plus — Danny B. 22:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Southparkfan (Verification pending) •  Southparkfan 23:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ejs-80 (Verification pending) •  –Ejs-80 23:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Kolega2357 (Verification pending) •  Kolega2357 (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. AGK (Verification pending) •  AGK [•] 23:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. SamanthaPuckettIndo (Verification pending) •  Ok. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Byfserag (Verification pending) •  Byfserag (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Zhuyifei1999 (Verification pending) •  Though he does not respond to memos. Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Daniel Mietchen (Verification pending) •  OK. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. John Vandenberg (Verification pending) •  John Vandenberg (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Armbrust (Verification pending) •  Armbrust (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Hkjacksonhk (Verification pending) •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Nicolas1981 (Verification pending) •  Nicolas1981 (talk) 04:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Liuxinyu970226 (Verification pending) •  Has good works on his toolserver. Who wanna disagree? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. David1010 (Verification pending) •  David1010 (talk) 05:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. PWester (Verification pending) •  PWester (talk) 07:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. This, that and the other (Verification pending) •  This, that and the other (talk) 08:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Chelin (Verification pending) •  Chelin (talk) 08:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Conny (Verification pending) •  Conny (talk) 08:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Raymond (Verification pending) •  Raymond (talk) 10:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Jon Harald Søby (Verification pending) •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Bene* (Verification pending) •  Bene* (talk) 11:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Timk70 (Verification pending) •  Timk70 question? 12:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Dungodung (Verification pending) •  FiliP ██ 12:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Laaknor (Verification pending) •  About time! Laaknor (talk) 13:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Steinsplitter (Verification pending) •  Steinsplitter (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bill william compton (Verification pending) •  Bill william compton (talk) 16:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Roberto Mura (Verification pending) •  Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  55. S.Didam (Verification pending) •  S.Didam (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  56. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Verification pending) •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Balko Kabo (Verification pending) •  Balko (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Someone not using his real name (Verification pending) •  Fully qualified. Someone not using his real name (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Work2win (Verification pending) •  Work2win (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  60. RLuts (Verification pending) •  RLuts (talk) 19:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Base (Verification pending) •  Base (talk) 20:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Cedalyon (Verification pending) •  Cedalyon (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Chris troutman (Verification pending) •  Chris Troutman (talk) 20:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Hoo man (Verification pending) •  Hoo man (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Holder (Verification pending) •  Of course! Holder (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Mardetanha (Verification pending) •  been working with him for many years, and found him very level-headed, hardworking and enthusiastic, one of the best additions this year Mardetanha talk 20:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  67. FakirNL (Verification pending) •  FakirNL (talk) 23:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Abd (Verification pending) •  Abd (talk) 00:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Hym411 (Verification pending) •  —레비Revi 07:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Taichi (Verification pending) •  Taichi - (あ！) 07:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Marmase (Verification pending) •  --Marmase (talk) 08:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Billinghurst (Verification pending) •  Excellent xwiki knowledge and experience. I almost went neutral as this role needs personal commitment for success, it is not a role for "being drafted".  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Husky (Verification pending) •  Husky (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Kaganer (Verification pending) •  Kaganer (talk) 10:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Wagino 20100516 (Verification pending) •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Omnipaedista (Verification pending) •  Omnipaedista (talk) 12:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Jianhui67 (Verification pending) •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  78. GZWDer (Verification pending) •  --GZWDer (talk) 13:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Jafeluv (Verification pending) •  Jafeluv (talk) 13:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Bms4880 (Verification pending) •  Bms4880 (talk) 14:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Javeec (Verification pending) •  Javeec (talk) 14:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Murma174 (Verification pending) •  Murma174 (talk) 15:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Arkanosis (Verification pending) •  — Arkanosis ✉ 16:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Zerabat (Verification pending) •  Zerabat (talk) 16:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Clockery (Verification pending) •  Clockery Fairfeld (talk • enWS) 17:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Wikiwind (Verification pending) •  Wikit 18:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Midnight Gambler (Verification pending) •  Midnight Gambler (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Niesy74 (Verification pending) •  Niesy74 (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Oscar (Verification pending) •  oscar (talk) 21:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No

  1. Goldenburg111 (Verification pending) •  I haven't seen you around the block... --Goldenburg111 19:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Snowolf (Verification pending) •  SPQRobin has undoubtedly a lot of experience cross-wiki from their work on Incubator and LangCom, but has been rarely seen on steward requests page, has been rather inactive in their GS role (outside of wikidata and mediawiki). Snowolf How can I help? 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rubin16 (Verification pending) •  I am afraid that you won't be a really active steward rubin16 (talk) 19:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ivan Štambuk (Verification pending) •  Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. GyaroMaguus (Verification pending) •  While is a good cross-wiki, his reluctance to post his candidacy and his relative inactivity make me feel he will not be as reliable as he needs to be. GyaroMaguus (talk) 01:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  2. Jasper Deng (Verification pending) •  Despite Snowolf's vote I still think he has enough experience cross-wiki, but I'm not quite ready to support. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Eminn (Verification pending) •  Emin • message 19:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Quentinv57 (Verification pending) •  No doubt you are a trusted user, but we do need active stewards. I'm concerned by your general activity level as a global sysop and the fact that you wrote your statement after the 28th. But not enough to oppose: I just hope you will take this into consideration if elected. Quentinv57 (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Rosser1954 (Verification pending) •  Rosser1954 (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2014/Votes/SPQRobin&oldid=7440060"