Property talk:P5094
Documentation
identifier of an entity of Portuguese influence, including geographic/toponymic, onomastic, original author, chronological references, etc.
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5094#Single value, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5094#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5094#Item P31, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5094#Item P17, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5094#Item P1435, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5094#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5094#Scope, SPARQL
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
Regex
editI've tightened the regex, from [1-9]\d*
to [1-9]\d{0,3}
. This allows all integers from 1 to 9999 - there don't seem to be any five-figure values; if there are, then it can be changed to [1-9]\d{0,4}
. The tighter regex will trap more errors. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing, ArthurPSmith: After a discussion ArthurPSmith's talk page and your comment here, an IP changed the constraint today. So I'm not sure where we are now, but 1-9999 should be fine... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Bizarrely, the IP changed
[1-9]\d{0,3}
to[1-9][0-9]{0,3}
, which has the same effect, but is more verbose. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Bizarrely, the IP changed
Subject object
editI have changed the subject object associated with this property: Now is Heritage of Portuguese Influence (Q40461605) instead the original Heritage of Portuguese Influence (Q38080272). The reason, discussed here, is that Q38080272 represents the database of the register and Q40461605 is the "heritage protection concept" included in the heritage designation (P1435) of all the items affected. So, this property, as a Wikidata property (P1687), must be linked with the Q40461605. Thanks, Amadalvarez (talk) 10:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Changed formatter URL and IDs
editApparently the site has changed the formatter URL and IDs, the former http://www.hpip.org/Default/pt/Homepage/Obra?a=790 is now https://www.hpip.org/pt/heritage/details/794. Joao4669 (talk) 18:45, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Sounds like a different property. You'd need to propose a new one. --- Jura 19:09, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- User:Pintoch as the property creator, what is your opinion?--Alexmar983 (talk) 19:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- (Not sure if having created the property gives me any authority on that question.) My gut feeling is that if the identifier values have changed it would not be very clean to repurpose this existing property by changing both the formatter URL and the values. Creating a new property would be cleaner, or simply use described at URL (P973) really. − Pintoch (talk) 20:06, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- FYI, I also ping @Pigsonthewing, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, NMaia, ArthurPSmith, YULdigitalpreservation, Jneubert: @Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton: from the proposal.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
I was mislead by the example above, in all cases that I tested the id remains the same. Joao4669 (talk) 00:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
@Bodhisattwa: changed the URL, thank you so much for that. Problem solved. Joao4669 (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)