Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microchannelization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted G11 as blatant, personal advertising. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Microchannelization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Neologism which is not in widespread use. 5 non-wiki ghits, none of which show notability; 0 gnews hits. Contested prod. Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC) This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Angr 21:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I would also have PROD-ed this if I had seen it while patrolling newpages. No evidence of even marginally common use in the real world. J.delanoy^gabsanalyze 16:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.