User talk:Surtsicna

m²

Hello, Surtsicna, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 17:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox peerage title has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox family. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.

Dear Surtsicna,

I hope that this message finds you well. I noticed that you had recently edited some pages on my watchlist. Consequently, I wanted to take this opportunity to formally welcome you back to Wikipedia. Please know that I have always appreciated and respected your insight, and your hiatus did not go unnoticed.

Also, I saw this comment of yours on Marie Antoinette's talk page. That piqued my interest because I have also found the ahnentafels presented on various articles to be quite confusing.

If I may ask, are you still interested in revising how royal genealogy is presented on Wikipedia? If so, I would be happy to work together with you to improve that presentation across articles. That being said, if you are not interested, I understand.

Sincerely,

AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AndrewPeterT. Thank you for your kind words. I am happy to be back and do still care about if/how we present genealogy. Surtsicna (talk) 08:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Perugia's limia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that dominant males of Perugia's limia (species pictured) may be so preoccupied with fighting each other that the females end up mating with the subordinate males? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Perugia's limia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Perugia's limia), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kingdom of Macedonia (proposal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability of this article. No reliable, secondary, independent sources can be found on this topic and this idea seems to be only an ephemeral short-lived proposal, if any.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jingiby (talk) 08:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Poecilia vandepolli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 05:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Poecilia vandepolli you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Poecilia vandepolli and Talk:Poecilia vandepolli/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Fishy Barnstar
		For your recent work on livebearers. They've been very educational! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]