Talk:HMS Renown (1916)

	HMS Renown (1916) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	HMS Renown (1916) is part of the Battlecruisers of the world series, a featured topic. It is also part of the Battlecruisers of the Royal Navy series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 30, 2010 Good article nominee Listed December 17, 2010 Good topic candidate Promoted October 31, 2013 Featured topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / World War II / Operation Majestic Titan GA‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force World War I task force World War II task force Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Ships GA‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Wasn't this ship also armed with torpedos? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.118.60.174 (talk) 13:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, she was. Both RENOWN and REPULSE were fitted with underwater torpedo tubes as first built. During her reconstruction, RENOWN had her underwater torpedo tubes removed, and replaced with four above-water tubes on the upper deck. Source: Renown & Repulse, Ensign 8, Maurice P. Northcott. Vvmodel (talk) 12:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In early 1945, RENOWN was recalled to home waters, reportedly to guard against a 'death ride' by surviving Kreigsmarine units.

The Admiralty assessment of the Kreigsmarine was that 'There may be a fair proportion of fanatical Nazis among the officers, and it is probable that some may prefer to sacrifice themselves in a desperate attack rather than survive to suffer the defeat that is now generally accepted". With all four surviving KGV-class battleships deployed in the Pacific, RENOWN was 'the only remaining ship capable of overhauling and outgunning anything afloat in home waters' (Bassett, Battle-cruisers: author's italics).

Ironically, by the time that RENOWN reached home waters, the only German ships which could have acted in this way (ADMIRAL SCHEER, HIPPER, EMDEN and LUTZOW) had all been destroyed or disabled. Vvmodel (talk) 12:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The main article states that RENOWN became nicknamed 'HMS Refit' after her 1930s reconstruction.

In fact, however, RENOWN and REPULSE became known to the lower deck as 'Refit' and 'Repair' in their earliest days, due to the number of changes that were made to rectify their deficiencies of armour - as first commissioned, the ships' two uninterrupted rows of scuttles revealed their severe lack of armour.

Between the designing and ordering of these ships and their arrival in service, battlecruiser losses at the Battle of Jutland had revealed the shortcomings of the "speed is armour" philosophy to which these ships had been conceived. Vvmodel (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to some reports, in early 1945 the Admiralty considered subjecting RENOWN to an extensive rebuild enabling her to serve for a furher twenty years, although it was eventually decided not to proceed with this plan. Had this project been undertaken, the ship would have been in service for an astonishing fifty years. Vvmodel (talk) 12:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The German WW1 battlecruiser SMS Goeben (see Wikipedia article of that name), transferred to Turkey as the Yavuz, survived till the early 1970’s.

Perhaps an update is needed here. Is anybody happy to do this ? Otherwise I'll give it a go in a little while !

Bunya (talk) 00:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have modified the article to reflect this. Jll (talk) 17:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Date of President Truman's visit. The article says Truman boarded HMS Renoun on 3 August 1945 to meet King George VI, but the official log of his trip gives the date as 2 August. (Note that the photograph of Truman and King George VI included with the article is correctly dated 2 August.) Gwogletree (talk) 23:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to rewrite

From January to March 1920 Renown was refitted more extensively as a "royal yacht".[14] Her aft 4-inch mounting and both 3-inch AA guns were removed so that extra accommodation and a promenade deck could be built. A large deck house was built on the shelter deck between the funnels.

in

From January to March 1920 Renown was refitted more extensively as a "royal yacht".[14] A promenade deck replaced the aft 4-inch mounting (see photo number 4 in Maritime Quest) and the construction of a large deck house on the shelter deck between the funnels caused the removal of the 3-inch AA guns.

Soon later, I feel that in

The rear triple 4-inch gun mount was replaced

replaced actually means repositiones/restored.

If you may access the first version of this comment, you will see how the original text led me to a ridiculous misunderstanding that I fixed searching the images of the time. pietro151.29.249.152 (talk) 09:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]