Talk:Double burden/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 18:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a "pre-review" of the article. I notice three things that need to be fixed before I delve into a prose review. First, the article needs to be wikified throughout. The tag on the top of the page explains how to do so. Second, the big quotes at the top of a couple sections should be fitted into the text itself and changed to normal size, as it doesn't look good as is. Third, for the fifth reference, make sure page numbers are added, and the fourth reference needs publisher data and the like. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note to say that none of the images have any valid permision and are likely to be deleted as they are. AIRcorn (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This review has been open for a week but no student has posted here. I am quite disappointed with; as I mentioned in class several times I expect a prompt reaction to the reviews. Please note that no activity for a week is grounds for closing this review as a fail. I hope this won't have to happen... (note to the reviewer: I'll make another class announcement on Monday afternoon). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 00:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. We will make immediate action on changing as well as improving the page to the standards you feel it needs to be. I agree in regards to the big quotes and their size being fitted. The images were taken off as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JOriola (talk • contribs) 04:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll post a prose review some time tonight or tomorrow. I've been backlogged badly on my end but it's mostly taken care of now. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could the cite error at the bottom of the page be fixed first? I'd do it but I'm not actually sure where it is. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:55, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We noticed the citation error at the bottom of the page, but we were not quite sure what it meant. I can take another look at it and try to figure out where exactly it is some time today. Jade.Richardson (talk) 17:09, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. This happens when a reference is defined in reflist but is unused in the body. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 18:17, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Jade.Richardson (talk) 18:20, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]