Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agraceful (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:18, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:18, 5 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 August 5. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Agraceful (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable band. No reliable sources identified despite GS search.The only hope in the list of Google news archive hits was a review that turned out to be user-contributed, not editorial appears likely . All the other references were in club listings and the like. Bongomatic 05:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not quite sure. They have one release on Sumerian Records which seems marginally notable (distributed by Red Distribution, a fairly non-trivial artist roster), and there is one review in the Cleveland Leader. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 05:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That is the review that is user-submitted—essentially a blog entry. It is not actually part of the newspaper.Bongomatic 05:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]- How do you know it's use submitted and not by someone who legitimately works for the paper? (There were three user submitted reviews in one of their album articles, which I redirected.) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 05:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't. However, the Leader claims to be a blog. See its advertising page. This is not the historical newspaper. Bongomatic 05:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How do you know it's use submitted and not by someone who legitimately works for the paper? (There were three user submitted reviews in one of their album articles, which I redirected.) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 05:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. Multiple, non-trivial coverage from reliable, verifiable sources required. If all we're going off of to confer notability is a review in the Cleveland Leader, that's not passing the standard. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 06:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- And to the Sumerian Records point, the band needs to release more than one album (and then we need to decide that Sumerian is "one of the more important indie labels"). Relevant quote: "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels."
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete now that I'm certain of the lack of verifiability regarding the few reviews I've found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.