User talk:HadesDragon

Helo !

I would like you to stop adding nonsense the article about Episode G. It is non-canon because Kurumada didn't write the plot. Megumu Okada was free to write the plot as he wanted, and Kurumada doesn't have anything to do with it.

I have already explained it in the discussion page of the article. But obviously you've made edits without even reading it (and you could be blocked for that), so I'm going to copy/paste what I wrote, so you'll have all the chances of reading it :

"For once and for all, Kurumada has nothing to do with Episode G.

1) On the cover of the japanese tankōbon of Episode G, Megumu Okada is credited for the "manga" (art AND story) while Kurumada is only the "author of the original manga" (meaning Saint Seiya).

2) In a little interview published in the 1st tankōbon of Episode G, Okada explains that Kurumada told him "Do whatever you want to do".

3) In 2004, Kurumada stated in an interview that Okada was "completely free for developing the story of Episode G", and that he was only supervising him a bit (meaning supervising the art of the manga, since Okada is said to be "completly free" for the story), but that gave a lot more time to "Kojiro 2" by his pupil, Yuri Satochi, than to Episode G.

All these facts means that Kurumada basically don't care about Episode G, and has almost nothing to do with it. Which means that Episode G absolutely cannot be concidered canon, since what is canon is what comes from the author, or what the author helped to write. These interviews are the proof that Kurumada really had nothing to do with the story of G, which is thus entirely from Okada, and which has even been contradictory with the original story.

Episode G is not canon, period. So please do not try to write the contrary. "

Now I've explained everything to you. So please stop adding false information, and ignoring the facts.

You talked about brazillian sites...My god, they're a bunch of liers. They created a lot of false rumors about the Hades saga. You can't trust them. They simply lied about Kurumada and Episode G: because he said it himself, he has nothing to do with the plot. That's official, he said it in an interview.

As for your claims about Brazil being "as close as possible to the original", it has nothing to do with that matter, and it's obviously wrong.

Anyway, continue to add nonsense like that and you'll be blocked.

Hey, I'm trying to get a discussion going on how to improve the Kingdom Hearts (series) article. Seeing as you've contributed to improving various articles for Kingdom Hearts, I was hoping that you could participate in the discussion on the talk page. (Guyinblack25 14:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Leo Aiolia from Megumu Okada's Saint Seiya Episode G.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cópia (2) de 2titansrunion4bo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cópia (2) de CriodelosAstros.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Episode G Crius.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tethys in Episode G.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hyperion in Episode G.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Current Oceanus.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Galaxy Crius in Episode G.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, what I will do is try to find information about the development of Light, Misa, and L from How to Read. If the creators explain character design, I may ressurrect the articles and add the character design notes (such as where the influences came from, why X choices in the character's design were made, etc.) WhisperToMe 21:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, okay. Though For Light and L, I think we might be able to leave them separate, but I think Misa's is just too short.

One more thing though: if you can, also try and find stuff that could fit in a "Reception/Impact" section, like what official, published things like review magazines and sites thought of the characters( I'll try and do that myself). Remember, the more real wolrd content, the more deserving of an article a character is. Just remember that we're going to need quite a bit of real-world content for the articles to stand on their own, so please show exactly what you found on the talk page first, and we'll try and discuss if separate character articles are important enough to stand on their own, okay?HadesDragon 22:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine :) - I'll see what I can get, especially when the weekends start :) WhisperToMe 00:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This Barnstar is for the time and effort you've put into the various articles related to the Kingdom Hearts series. Thanks to your efforts, the Kingdom Hearts Featured topic has been further expanded and the Characters of Kingdom Hearts has just passed FA. Guyinblack25 talk 03:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, ^_^. I try.HadesDragon 14:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Create an article with all info like cosmo, armors and concepts in the series. (specially to clean the main page)
• Create a media section with the soundtracks and videogames (specially to clean the main page)
• Merge minor saints in an article like list of characters or minor saints.
• Merge minor spectres in an article like list of minor spectres, etc.

REASON: We are giving articles to a lot of characters that appear once(or even couldnt say their names). This is not a saint seiya fan site. The ones that will have their own articles are Athena, the 5 bronze, the 14 gold and some gods. Please, reason before answering me or check other anime articles. Note: I put this topic in the main saint seiya article one week ago. Nobody commented. Please discuss and see that some articles of characters are edited every two months. If nobody comments Ill merge some articles, comment in the page send a message,etc. See you^_^. Tintor2 11:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Eh, I do agree with you that the Saint Seiya articles need TONS of cleanup. So what should we do first?HadesDragon (talk) 14:28, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Em, first we can merge most spectres in list of minor spectres, then delete the articles (I dont know how to do that or if we need administrador) Then create an article list of minor saints and merge there some. Confirm and Ill start the merge. See you^_^. Tintor2 19:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)