User talk:Xchanter: Difference between revisions

As you have been told elsewhere, Wikipedia is WP:NOT censored for minors. I understand that you feel strongly that it should be, but I encourage you to consider the implications of this. If it is, then the next step is to censor photos that show women's faces because that violates the law in some Muslim countries. Also, any diagrams showing a swastika would need to be removed from any articles on WWII because they are illegal in Germany. Wikipedia is an international project, and censorship (much less the dramatically incorrect reading of the laws you have exhibited) is not appropriate as it is unenforceable or practical on the international stage. Finally, some of the messages you have left on the subject have been borderline incivil. Also, shouting or screaming (typing in all caps to emphasize) is strongly discouraged. I hope you will reconsider the nature of your contributions to the project going forward. This appears to be an almost single purpose account on a 'crusade' of sorts, I hope this is not the case. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 02:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In what country are pictures of erect male genetalia allowed to be shown to minors, sir?

Xchanter 03:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Xchanter[reply]

Your interest in male genitalia and children is not the issue here, being civil to your fellow wikipedians is. In regards to the rest of the conversation, since you have not answered the rest of my question, whyever should I pay any attention to yours? - CHAIRBOY (☎) 05:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You believe, sir, that I am a Nazi? Not that it will help, because, frankly, you have been the one who has accused and not answered, but my great grandfather was a Rabi. I completely understand your discussion of where the slope should be defined, and I am saying: at pictures of erect male genetalia. To place the words back in the public domain (for your response was certainly rude, and I would ... if we were in person), I do not believe pictures of erect penises should be shown to children. That you disagree is to your own morality.

I will leave you alone if you do the same.

My best wishes,

Xchanter 05:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Xchanter[reply]

I think you may have responded to the wrong person, where's the nazi talk and rudeness stuff you're talking about? If you'd like some assistance navigating Wikipedia, I'd be happy to help, but I'll need a little more information. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 05:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir-

So apparently, this is your site. You have the ability to insult me, not respond to me, and put your insults back on in the public domain. And you call me a Nazi.

Respond reasonably.

Xchanter 06:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Xchanter[reply]

You still haven't shown me where I called you a Nazi. I've been nothing but civil to you, I'm beginning to suspect your motivations. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 06:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will be perfectly clear: a man saying another man is interested in male genatalia and children is fighting words (bad english, but the point is there). You were deliberately rude to me and, frankly you can f*** o**. Should you have the power with this site to remove/destroy my presence, then you had best: do so; attempt a different tone; leave me alone. I herein provide you that opportunity.

My best,

Xchanter 06:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Xchanter[reply]

You have one final chance to provide evidence that I called you a Nazi (you've repeated that claim more than once). I cannot simply 'leave you alone' when you're launching attacks and intimidating other users, that's just not possible. I await your response. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 06:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is inappropriate for you to blank warnings and context from your user talk page at this juncture. I have reverted your changes, please do not delete anything from here for the time being while your actions are being evaluated. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 05:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I will destroy you.

Xchanter 06:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Xchanter[reply]