Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Farrel: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions]]. Happy New Year!!! '''<sup>[[User:Babymissfortune|<span style="color:#552582;">Baby</span>]][[User talk:Babymissfortune|<span style="color:#061922;">miss</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Babymissfortune|<span style="color:#FDB927;">fortune</span>]]</sup>''' 12:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions]]. Happy New Year!!! '''<sup>[[User:Babymissfortune|<span style="color:#552582;">Baby</span>]][[User talk:Babymissfortune|<span style="color:#061922;">miss</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Babymissfortune|<span style="color:#FDB927;">fortune</span>]]</sup>''' 12:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' does not meet notability criteria for academics.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 01:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' does not meet notability criteria for academics.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 01:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
*'''Neutral''' I created article because the guy has headed many IETF groups and written RFCs which has more than 1000 citations. Furthermore, according to Amazon he has multiple books. However, for me his non-computer science books were never a criteria of his notability. I do not care if the article is deleted or kept. --- [[User:ALM_scientist|A. L. M.]] 17:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
*'''Neutral''' I created article because the guy has headed many IETF groups and written RFCs which has more than 1000 citations. Furthermore, according to Amazon he has multiple books. However, for me his non-computer science books were never a criteria of his notability. I do not care if the article is deleted or kept. --- [[User:ALM_scientist|A. L. M.]] 17:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:26, 2 January 2018

Adrian Farrel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article currently is a CV cited to primary sources (largely added by the subject himself). There's no evidence at all that any of his books have received significant secondary attention (the most recent three are self-published). Whether or not he'd been elected to a position in a minor UK political party, he'll need to have had significant coverage in reliable seondary sources to meet WP:GNG. In the absence of any compelling claims of notability, time for the article to go. Sionk (talk) 12:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 12:34, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 12:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 12:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not meet notability criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral I created article because the guy has headed many IETF groups and written RFCs which has more than 1000 citations. Furthermore, according to Amazon he has authored multiple computer science books. However, for me his non-computer science books were never a criteria of his notability. I do not care if the article is deleted or kept. --- A. L. M. 17:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]