Talk:Investor–state dispute settlement: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{wptrade| class=C| importance=high}} |
{{wptrade| class=C| importance=high}} |
||
{{WikiProject Law|class=C|importance=}} |
{{WikiProject Law|class=C|importance=}} |
||
{{WikiProject Integrity}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
Revision as of 00:35, 11 April 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Investor–state dispute settlement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
Starting article on Investor-state provisionsNimbusWeb (talk) 02:09, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Article name
Seems to me that a more accurate and WP:MOS title for this article would be Investor-state dispute settlement, with a hyphen and only the first word capitalized. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 18:24, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 00:03, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Article lead
Good to see this article being further developed. One thing that needs attention, in my opinion, is the article lead, which should be expanded to more provide a broader overview of the topic and summary of the scope of the article. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 00:02, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
NPOV
IMHO the arguments against ISDS are not properly balanced by arguments in favor of them. Investors may feel a justified need to act against rogue states not respecting their rights.
The argument that ISDS decisions may override democratic decisions is nothing special. Constitutional courts correct democratic decisions all the time. Remember that Hitler came to power by a democratic decision - but unfortunately no opportunity existed at the time to challenge his decisions in court! Private parties may invoke courts to challenge government decisions, that is normal nowadays.
It occurs to me that the prime problem is the opacity of the procedure and the lack of a procedure to challenge the independence of the panels. That is badly needed since the legal issues in these conflict are complicated.
If a firm must close overnight due to a law that was adopted unexpectedly by the government, some compensation seems justified. But firms producing controversial products (from nuclear power plants to cigarettes) could be prepared for changes in legislation. Firms recruiting women in Eastern Europe to work in the see industry even more so. Rbakels (talk) 04:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Mention TTIP !
I looked into this article, searched for "transatlan" and "TTIP" in vein, therefore considered that article as whatsoever low quality and gone again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.200.171.174 (talk) 11:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC) It urgently needs a profund list of all free trade agreements containing isds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.200.171.174 (talk) 11:52, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Debate Section Full of Unreferenced Proponents Claims
Wonder how anyone got away with stuffing so many unreferenced proponents claims in the debate section.This article could be a good case study for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Integrity/Editor Registry NimbusWeb (talk) 10:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- C-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- C-Class United Nations articles
- WikiProject United Nations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Mid-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class Trade articles
- High-importance Trade articles
- WikiProject Trade articles
- C-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- WikiProject Integrity articles