User talk:A Nobody: Difference between revisions
→OK: new section |
I will enjoy the spaghetti, which should be ready momentarily. I will hope that you will not excuse personal attacks declaring editors as "butts" and "enemies". |
||
Line 273: | Line 273: | ||
Hi there. I wanted to thank you for supporting, but couldn't help but notice that you said I have 6 awards. Immediately under that list is [[User:The_Thing_That_Should_Not_Be/Awards|a link to my older ones]] (I only have 6 listed on there so my userpage isn't a huge mess.). In any case, thanks again for supporting. <font face="Segoe Print">[[User:TTTSNB|<font color=#04B>The Thing]] <small>//</small> [[User talk:TTTSNB|<font color=#078>Talk]] <small>//</small> [[Special:Contributions/The Thing That Should Not Be|<font color=#0A5>Contribs]]</span> 16:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
Hi there. I wanted to thank you for supporting, but couldn't help but notice that you said I have 6 awards. Immediately under that list is [[User:The_Thing_That_Should_Not_Be/Awards|a link to my older ones]] (I only have 6 listed on there so my userpage isn't a huge mess.). In any case, thanks again for supporting. <font face="Segoe Print">[[User:TTTSNB|<font color=#04B>The Thing]] <small>//</small> [[User talk:TTTSNB|<font color=#078>Talk]] <small>//</small> [[Special:Contributions/The Thing That Should Not Be|<font color=#0A5>Contribs]]</span> 16:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
:You are welcome and I shall correct my typo ASAP! Best, --[[User:A Nobody|A Nobody]]<sup>''[[User talk:A Nobody|My talk]]''</sup> 16:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
:You are welcome and I shall correct my typo ASAP! Best, --[[User:A Nobody|A Nobody]]<sup>''[[User talk:A Nobody|My talk]]''</sup> 16:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
== OK == |
|||
You are, of course entitled to remove my post without answering the question I asked you. |
|||
Please do not refer to other editors as 'racist' absent any evidence of racism as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FList_of_the_occult_secret_societies&action=historysubmit&diff=343018580&oldid=343015692 here]. That was a personal attack. |
|||
Enjoy your spaghetti <small>note this is not a racist slur</small> <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">[[User:Pablo X| pablo]]</span><sub style="color: #c30;">[[User talk:Pablo X|hablo]].</sub> 22:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:40, 9 February 2010
A Nobody is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
I am semi-attempting a wikibreak due to school and as one family member will had surgery late last year to remove a tumor in her head and chest, and subsequently, her head bled from where the tumor was removed; meanwhile, another tumor has split on her sister's leg. I could be away again and/or out of sorts and if the latter will probably avoid here as well. It is possible, however, that I will not be able to keep away from Wikipedia for that long, and I could be back a lot earlier while making some small edits every so often. Messages left for me may not be replied to for a while and when I do log on, it will mostly likely be to take care of specific matters (thus please do not take offense if it seems like I am ignoring anyone as it not my intention, I just only have time for priority matters) Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 20:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC) |
Welcome to my talk page! Please be sure to make all posts civil and constructive, as I will ignore or revert anything I deem to be bad faith, dishonest, or vandalism. For example, anyone who has ever referred to me as something other than my username or by some insulting play on my username is not welcome here, barring they apologized and made good faith amends. Also, let us try to keep two-way conversations readable. If you post to my talk page, I will just reply here. If I posted recently to another talk page, including your talk page, then that means I have it on my watchlist and will just read responses there. I may refactor discussions to your talk page for the same reason. Also, please do not refer to me here or elsewhere by my previous username as I changed names due to real-world off-wiki harassment that remains a concern. Due to the issues that caused my name change and other matters (such as the demands of college!) I may be slow in responding to messages and I may even stop editing for long stretches of time. Sincerely, --A Nobody 18:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
To add to this article
I am not sure what was on the previous version of the article, but the following out of universe information can be added from "Resistance 2: Getting To Know Nathan Hale," PlayStation The Official Magazine 13 (November 2008): 62: the character is voiced by David Kaye. PTOM states that "The Resistance 2 story is all about Nathan Hale and his role in this great conflict." Ted Price, one of the game developers, adds, "Internally we wanted to know more about Hale, and focusing on him provided the opportunity to answer questions about him." Thus, I encourage someone to restore the article and add this information in a manner such as this:
Nathan Hale is the protagonist of the Playstation 3 games Resistance: Fall of Man and its sequel Resistance 2. He is voiced by David Kaye.[1]
Development
Ted Price, one of the game developers, adds, "Internally we wanted to know more about Hale, and focusing on him provided the opportunity to answer questions about him."[2]
Biography
Hale killed practically every chimera in England and then went to America to win again.
Reception
PTOM states that "The Resistance 2 story is all about Nathan Hale and his role in this great conflict."[3] Playstation Universe lists Hale among the top five Playstation 3 characters thus far.[4]
References
- ^ "Resistance 2: Getting To Know Nathan Hale," PlayStation The Official Magazine 13 (November 2008): 62.
- ^ "Resistance 2: Getting To Know Nathan Hale," PlayStation The Official Magazine 13 (November 2008): 62.
- ^ "Resistance 2: Getting To Know Nathan Hale," PlayStation The Official Magazine 13 (November 2008): 62.
- ^ Dave Wales, "Top five PlayStation 3 characters thus far," Playstation Universe (March 16th, 2008): http://www.psu.com/Top-five-PlayStation-3-characters-thus-far--a0003095-p0.php
Restoration
Nathaniel is a character in Jonathan Stroud's Bartimaeus Trilogy. Nathaniel is one of the main characters of this series. After coming of age as a magician when he was 12 years old, he was granted the new name of John Mandrake, and is known by this name to everyone but the title character, Bartimaeus and in the later part of Ptolemy's Gate to Kitty.
Attributes
Appearance
In The Amulet of Samarkand he is described as being small and scrawny with dark hair. His hair, as he increases in rank, becomes increasingly long, but during the gap between The Golem's Eye and Ptolemy's Gate he has opted for a crew cut in (politically advantageous) tribute to the soldiers fighting in America. He is further described as attractive, with "the scent of power [hanging] around him" and of medium height and slender build, his forehead prematurely lined (Ptolemy's Gate, U.S. Edition, pg. 21).
Personality
Nathaniel is, at first, a small, shy boy uncomfortable with anyone who is not Mrs. Underwood or Ms. Lutyens. He is very nervous and scared by Bartimaeus when he first summons the demon. As the books progress, and he becomes more and more proficient, he also becomes more confident, and possibly overconfident. He works fervently when motivated, as is shown when he furthers his education with incredible speed in The Amulet of Samarkand. Throughout the books he also shows signs of ambition to rise through the ranks of the government, a common goal among magicians. Bartimaeus compares him more than once to Simon Lovelace, as they share a similar mindset, and habitual tics, such as stroking back their hair.
Role in books
The Amulet of Samarkand
In The Amulet of Samarkand, Nathaniel starts off as a young boy who, at the age of five, had been given up by his parents to apprenticeship under a mediocre Whitehall magician named Arthur Underwood, the assistant minister of Internal Affairs. Underwood begins teaching the boy in magic, but Nathaniel, being inquisitive, decides to advance his education to higher levels without the knowledge of his tutor.
However, at the age of eleven, in his master's house, Nathaniel is publicly humiliated by a greedy and ambitious young magician named Simon Lovelace. In a fit of juvenile fury, Nathaniel hatches a plan for vengeance. He sets several mites (a weak kind of imp) on Lovelace, but Lovelace is powerful and stops the mites, then proceeds to beat Nathaniel as punishment.
Later, after much research and preparation, Nathaniel summons Bartimaeus, a 5,000-year-old djinni, to exact his revenge on Lovelace. Mrs. Underwood - Nathaniel's master's wife - inadvertently reveals Nathaniel's true name to Bartimaeus. This vastly limits Nathaniel's control over the djinni, because spells can be cast on people when their true name is known (hence the practice of assigning names).
In the end, Nathaniel earns the respect of the majority of the other magicians including Rupert Devereaux, the Prime Minister. He is accepted as a magician in the government.
The Golem's Eye
Nathaniel summons Bartimaeus again, facing off against the Resistance and sinister magicians.
The second book picks up almost three years later and features Nathaniel as a junior magician working his way up the government ranks. He is described as one of the governments' rising young stars. In this book, Kitty Jones is introduced as an important character. She is a part of the Resistance movement, which seeks to end the oppressive rule of the magicians. Nathaniel is tasked by his superiors to crush the Resistance movement and capture the members. His task is complicated when a seemingly invulnerable clay golem starts to make random attacks on London. Much to the displeasure of Bartimaeus, Nathaniel recalls the djinni to aid him in uncovering the origins of the golem, and to save his own skin.
During the course of the book Nathaniel is almost fired from his post and executed for treason. By the end of the book however he has come back to favor when Duvall's conspiracy comes to light.
Ptolemy's Gate
In Ptolemy's Gate, Nathaniel has risen to the ruling Council and is arguably the most powerful magician in the government. He stands against a force of hybrid magicians with spirits trapped inside them, led by Nouda. Romantic feelings are hinted at in the book at various points between Kitty and himself. Nathaniel summons Bartimaeus into his body to help fight the Hybrids with Gladstone's staff, and destroys most of them, leaving only Nouda alive. However, during this fight, Nathaniel is seriously injured and he loses strength quickly, even with Bartimaeus' assistance. When Nathaniel and Bartimaeus confront Nouda, Nathaniel dismisses Bartimaeus which saves Baritmaeus just prior to the staff being destroyed killing both Nouda and Nathaniel. Bartimaeus returned to the Other Place, but is known to have survived; according to his "journal", he was summoned by a female magician with a stutter afterwards. Kitty, in the end, goes visit her old friend Jakob before she begins to travel around the world in a new life.
Trivia
- Nathaniel's chosen magician name, John Mandrake, may be a reference to the popular comic strip and real life magician, Mandrake the Magician
- Nathaniel's birthday is on November 26, as confirmed by the author.
External links
References
RFA Thanks
References
Greetings and salutations
Hoi, A Nobody! This is Tenebris from the Tonight Show article (216.254.156.188 in this dial-up incarnation, a range which I apparently share with at least one tadpole vandal). Just letting you know that I have my reasons for not creating a Wikipedia account (and let the chips drop where they may), but stopping by especially to mention that it was pleasant to see at least one message in that direction which was not an automated bot. Being unregistered, I won't ever be able to create my first article; but I have enough familiarity with the five pillars to recognise the humour in many of the meta-wiki discussions. (Call me an intrigued amateur Internet archaeologist.) Even so, thank you for the thought. Being both unregistered and a dial-up with a large provider, I know I come across as the perpetual newbie with no wiki history. It is another amusing thing in life that few things better draw aside the polite veil of potential administrative retribution to reveal the true character of both observer and observed.
- Fair enough and happy editing! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 14:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Thank you for the update! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 22:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey
Spinach Monster (talk) 04:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hello! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 14:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello! how are you? Can you please review my article? As per your last suggestions, I have tried to make the article less listy, have added one link about MaaS in media, and tried to rewrite the article in an non advertising tone. Please advise how much work I need to more do to make it go live. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by PCJain (talk • contribs) 10:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I have fixed some of the references. You need to have references after, not before sentences. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 18:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Please review my article
Hello! How are you?
Can you please review my article? As per your last suggestions, I have tried to make the article less listy, have added one link about MaaS in media, and tried to rewrite the article in an non advertising tone. Please advise how much work I need to more do to make it go live. Thank you PCJain (talk) 10:08, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I have fixed some of the references. You need to have references after, not before sentences. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 18:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Rebecca Chambers and Claire Redfield
I really wish you would not rush articles out that weren't finished. If you want to finish them be my guest, but until then moving out articles with a list of external links is NOT the way to do this and just makes it harder to make the article. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 17:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
| |||
|
New featured articles:
New featured lists: New featured pictures: New featured sounds: New A-Class articles:
| ||
| |||
| |||
| |||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the update! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 18:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK on Sallie Gardner at a Gallop
Hi ANobody, I've always looked at your opinions as very sensible stuff either negative or positive. That's why in light of this matter I would like to ask your opinion with regard to this DYK Nomination, which has been arguing the contents of Sallie Gardner at a Gallop and Eadweard Muybridge. We'll appreciate your inputs on this issue and I'd like to clear my perspective in this matter as well. I'd like to correct how I view articles should be created if in case I'm wrong. Thanks.--TitanOne (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Is it still listed? I had to take a few days off due to diverticulitis and did not not edit from...
- 15:12, 9 February 2010 (hist | diff) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the occult secret societies (comment)
- 16:45, 4 February 2010 (hist | diff) User:New Age Retro Hippie/Rebecca Chambers (→Reception: merged from Rebecca Chambers (character))
- I am doing better now. Can I still help or has this one already been resolved? Best, --A NobodyMy talk 18:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Guess what!?
It is February 6th, 2010, just saying ;) DustiSPEAK!! 19:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, but I will only run if 100 people sign that I should. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 18:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Participation at my RfA
Thank you for taking the time to weigh in on my RfA. It was successful, in that the community's wish not to grant me the tools at this time was honored. I'm taking all the comments as constructive feedback and hope to become more valuable to the project as a result; I've also discovered several new areas in which to work. Because debating the merits of a candidate can be taxing on the heart and brain, I offer this kitten as a low-allergen, low-stress token of my appreciation. --otherlleft 14:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
- You are welcome and congratulations! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 15:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Thank you for the update! Best, --A NobodyMy talk 15:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Your support
Hi there. I wanted to thank you for supporting, but couldn't help but notice that you said I have 6 awards. Immediately under that list is a link to my older ones (I only have 6 listed on there so my userpage isn't a huge mess.). In any case, thanks again for supporting. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- You are welcome and I shall correct my typo ASAP! Best, --A NobodyMy talk 16:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)