Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Wind shear/1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:59, 7 February 2024

Wind shear

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result pending

Given the lack of response at the notice, I have copied and pasted my concerns below. I have not evaluated other criteria at this time. If someone wishes to work on it, I can do a more extensive review. The article will be delisted on February 14 if the concerns are not addressed.

There are areas needing citations as well as different sources since verification failed.
There seems to be more topics and newer sources discussing windshear here
The article seems quite unbalanced with most of it discussing vertical wind shear and Im unsure that all the main aspects are being addressed. Noah, AA^Talk 16:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Howdy. I’ve awaken from my crypt. ;) I’ll look into the citations, but newer citations aren’t always better. From what I recall, original sourcing is the name of the game, which argues against newness in established topics. If you’re unsure what needs to be addressed further, why GAR? Be bold and explore the topic. GAR is not completely incumbent on the main contributor to figure out what you mean. I hear you’ve GARed another article where this is true, and will respond there more appropriately. I hope you’re not simply targeting articles for GAR where the main contributors have been inactive lately. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *There seems to be more topics and newer sources discussing windshear [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C15&as_ylo=2010&q=wind+shear&btnG= here]
 *The article seems quite unbalanced with most of it discussing vertical wind shear and Im unsure that all the main aspects are being addressed. [[User:Hurricane Noah|<b style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah</b>]], [[Associate of Arts|AA]]<sup>[[User talk:Hurricane Noah|<b style="color:#ff0000">Talk</b>]]</sup> 16:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
+*:Howdy.  I’ve awaken from my crypt.  ;)   I’ll look into the citations, but newer citations aren’t always better.  From what I recall, original sourcing is the name of the game, which argues against newness in established topics.  If you’re unsure what needs to be addressed further, why GAR?  Be bold and explore the topic.   GAR is not completely incumbent on the main contributor to figure out what you mean.  I hear you’ve GARed another article where this is true, and will respond there more appropriately.  I hope you’re not simply targeting articles for GAR where the main contributors have been inactive lately.  [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 21:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC)