Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marine Software Engineering

Marine Software Engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted as uncontroversial and undeleted by request. The term is defined by the Marine Software Engineering Cluster of Excellence, the subject of another AfD, and does not meet the general notability guideline. Article is unreferenced. I was unable to locate independent, secondary sources. Single mentions in Google Books and Google Scholar are in name only. Google News results are all to "Marine Software Engineering Cluster of Excellence." Pnm (talk) 16:43, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this could honestly go to speedy deletion and I don't think any sane person would argue. It makes no real claim to notability, is unreferenced, and is extremely spammy. Thanks, but no thanks. l'aquatique[talk] 17:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marine Software Engineering is used by a fast growing open source community in the marine sector. The article is being improved by the whole community and already meets clearly the requirements in the general notability guideline. Being a personal user I am surprised on how this community driven initiative is treated. If anyone thinks the article is spammy I would suggest that the person improves the article. Teakboy42 (talk) This template must be substituted.

Delete. There are no references, and the tone is that of an advertisment. It seems likely that it was created by a person with a conflict of interest. Even if sources were found, it would need a full rewrite by someone else. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: not sure what to make of this... diff. I'm not sure G7 qualifies as the article is rather old and has had many editors. Any thoughts? l'aquatique[talk] 05:11, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]