Talk:Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Survey: restore comment on user's vote
Vargwilku (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 155:
:::LOL, well I didn't think it was that bad, but ok, opinion accepted. I see we have to either go with Trentino-Alto Adige or Trentino-South Tyrol to gain consensus. I don't know, at this point I can agree either of these is fine. There is the weight of having some English in Trentino-South Tyrol, but also there is the weight of Trentino-Alto Adige being used in the vast majority of English sources, maps, etc. You know, I wish the Austrian/German folk could also be a bit flexible with their thinking on this. I'm not insulting anyone! I'm just saying, lets really compromise on this, consider better others opinions. I'm certainly trying my best here..... [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 20:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Support''': time to end all of this and keep it nuetral. [[User:Vargwilku|Vargwilku]] 18:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)<small>— Possible '''[[Wikipedia:Single purpose account|single purpose account]]''': [[User:Vargwilku|Vargwilku]] ([[User talk:Vargwilku|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vargwilku|contribs]]) {{{2|}}} has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.</small>
:According to [[User:Rarelibra|Rarelibra]]'s edit summaries, this might be one of his co-workers, and so not a sockpuppet. That doesn't change the fact that he has no contributions outside these polls. [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 09:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
:Someone better be saving their beer money. :) [[User:Taalo|Taalo]] 07:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' move, oppose moving during WP:RM discussion, and point out that [[Trento-South Tyrol]] listed above as the present name has never been other than a redirect. [[User:Gene Nygaard|Gene Nygaard]] 19:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)