User talk:INeverCry/Archive 7: Difference between revisions

:::Take a step back here guys. You are both veteran editors with a high quality contribution history. I think Floquenbeam has a point in regards to evidence but an immediate threat to block a veteran editor indefinitely without first acknowledging that there may be a reason for such a comment is way over the top. Also, I agree with INeverCry in regards to the usage of 'WTF' - it wasn't very civil. Thank you. [[User:Trooper1005|-=Troop=-]] ([[User talk:Trooper1005|talk]]) 21:45, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

::::{{reply|Floquenbeam|Trooper1005}} I'm simply repeating a concern that was voiced in the first RFA, but I get threatened with an indef block, even though I've never been blocked in almost 9 years of editing. How can I be threatened with a block for repeating a concern that was allowed to be used by several opposers in the first RFA? Is that fair treatment? Anyways, I'll stay away from that RFA and move on with the work I was doing. [[User talk:INeverCry|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font face="Comic sans ms" color="black"><b>lNeverCry</b></font></span>]] 21:51, 6 July 2017 (UTC)