Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 08 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Consensual review

File:Convento_de_Cristo_-_Storage_Room_-_1.jpg

  • Nomination Storage Room in Convento de Cristo / Tomar, Portugal --Imehling 09:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but except the column in the middle, eveything is unsharp and grainy. --Palauenc05 11:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The details are lacking, even on the column.--Peulle 09:45, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

File:001_2022_04_09_Ei.jpg

  • Nomination Egg in high-key photographic composition
    --F. Riedelio 09:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • I'm seeing lots of artefacts. Is it just me on my computer or do others see the same?--Peulle 11:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • I also see a lot of compression artefacts. The clean white background is nice, but a white object on a white background is not a good choice for contrast. A slight grey would probably fit much better --Hangman'sDeath 12:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 08:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support This version is OK to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 05:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Neutral. I will not decline. But there is not enough contrast. That's nearly like a black cat in the dark cellar without light. -- Spurzem 10:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment This is high-key photography where bright tones, soft lighting and low contrasts predominate. --F. Riedelio 06:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support The photo is very well done, even if I would have preferred a slightly different aspect ratio. It is a little too narrow for me. I don't like the naming convention in the file name. I think the designation of the object belongs in front, the order or sorting identification of the photographer in the back. For example, I would have named it "Chicken Egg Highkey <ident code>". --Smial 09:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]