User talk:Kailash29792

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Please if you could take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Anurag Kashyap filmography/archive1 as well. Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:39, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

For the third and last time I'm nominating this list for FL, and I can't afford another failure. So, please leave your comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kailash29792, Pavanjandhyala has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I created this page Balamani and got a warning on my talk page. This is the only good reference I found: http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/cinema-columns/blast-from-the-past-balamani-1937/article6625126.ece --Action Hero 15:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Action Hero: The article was not being tagged because of the film's lack of notability; it was tagged because you plagiarised from another source. But I'll try reworking the article to save it. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't plagiarise. That was a general statement that came to my mind after reading the article. That website is unknown to me. This line "Balamani is a Tamil detective movie released in 1937" doesn't constitute plagiarism. If I write "Jawaharlal Nehru was the first Prime Minister of India", that bot might say I plagiarized the line from 5000 sources. I googled "Balamani 1937". --Action Hero 16:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you reduce the size of the picture. The article is a stub. The picture looks too big for a small article. It's impossible to find more sources of a 1937 film. As reliable non-English sources are allowed, you can find Tamil sources. Action Hero 08:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can expand the article with information from Randor Guy's article. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Intiguttu (1958 film). Action Hero 06:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My username is NOT 'MANI RATNAM', but 'ManiRatnamAvargal'. The Tamil word 'Avargal' makes it a third person reference. If you still insist on a name change, do guide me through the procedure, as I am unsure whether I can manually change it myself.

I would prefer the name to be changed to 'ManiRatnamRasigan'. 'Rasigan' is again a Tamil word, which means 'FAN'. Another option is 'IndianCinemaRasigan'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManiRatnamAvargal (talk • contribs) 10:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the ISBN of Guy's, Baskaran's and Ganesan's book, you can use the barcode on the book itself I think. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I will do it soon. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks very much ready for GA (given that it was recently copyedited too). Would you like to nominate it or shall I do the honours? Your call. The reason is because Sriram's last edit was on 4 February 2015, 7 months ago. I don't think it's likely he'll be returning anytime soon. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may nominate it. I talked to Sriram via mail, and he said will certainly return, although he did not specify exactly when. Just get the article copyedited once again (by a different editor) if needed, but it otherwise looks GA worthy. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And another thing Ssven2; This is a video of the 50th year celebrations of KNI, uploaded on YouTube by Behindwoods. See where you can use it in the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have just nominated it for GA. I'll look into the video tomorrow. The film should have been promoted long ago IMO. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssven2: Hey guys! Thanks for taking the article to GA. And I see Anniyan is at GAN. Thanks for bringing my hardwork to fruition. Btw, my comeback to active editing is definitely on the cards. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 16:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back Sriram. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -- Sriram ^{speak up} 16:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This actor's biography, filmography and accolades are currently at WP:FTC here. Please post your comments (if any) there as I don't want the nomination to fail due to lack of activity. -- Frankie _talk 17:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kailash,you edited the budget of 'Baahubali:The Beginning' to 250 crores from 120 crores.But the page is only about the 1st part of the movie which is made of a budget of 120 crores.250 cr is budget of both films combined.So it will be appropriate to keep 120 crores.Thanks Vicky (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This, is my first film awards list at the FLC. If interested, please leave your comments here. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated the article for GA. I could wait for someone to pick and review that, but I want someone familiar with Bollywood to review it. You can ignore this message if you're not willing to do it Frankie _talk 17:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With two exams nearing for me, I do not want to strain myself into reviews. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correction Sir. Baradwaj Rangan says a musical trope from Europe was used. A trope is a signature, in this case a musical signature. That is not to be confused with an orchestra troupe. We would be spreading wrong information by saying Ilayaraja used a foreign orchestra troupe. I am a die hard fan of Maestro so do not mistake me. But Rangan speaks of a trope, not a troupe. Thanks for understanding. Saying this here since it has been added again after it has been removed. Cheers. Venkateswaran Ganesan (talk) 07:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Answered in my page. I've not contacted anyone on wiki before so I'm figuring out how this messaging works. Never mind the repetition here.

Venkateswaran Ganesan (talk) 08:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So you like Dirty Harry, do you, Punk? Classic! Thanks for the thanks, bro. When did you watch the film first? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think Magnum Force is my favourite out of the Dirty Harry films! You can't get more bad ass than Clint in the 70s!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: In you opinion, which are your favourite Eastwood films, Doc? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw Dirty Harry last year. I intend to watch the entire series. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great! BTW, why don't you start a film list like me and Doc here? I could use some of your recommendations too! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! What an enthusiasm? Another list added to the existing four. But, are you interested in the first place Kailash? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I'm not interested in keeping lists like this on Wiki. But I never forget the movies I watched. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Sounds like you follow WP:OR in this case, though it isn't applicable for userpages. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,

I shall wish to know why you deleted my modification on the movie of MGR, ANBE VAA ( 1966 )

Thank you for answering me.

Ferdinand LACOUR.

For your information :

I am specialized on the question of MGR in France within the association France MGR Péravai,

Ferdinand LACOUR.

Lacour ferdinand octave, the reason why I deleted your "contributions" to Anbe Vaa is, because you wrote in an extremely disruptive manner, like a man who fell on his head. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,

I did not offend to you, thus remain courteous, they are only articles of cinema

Ferdinand Lacour

Especially that your information is erroneous !

Please at least write in a proper, clean and mature manner. At least stop writing film names in capitals. E.g.: Anbe Vaa is correct. ANBE VAA is not. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne comprends pas que vous persistiez à laisser des informations erronées sur la page wikipedia du film tamoul ANBE VAA, 1966, avec MGR... Notamment, sur la distribution artistique (le casting) du film, vous êtes complètement dans l'erreur, par exemple l'actrice T. P. Muthulakshmi n'est pas l'infirmière, mais la mère du personnage de l'actrice Sarodja Devi. Celle qui joue l'infirmière est l'actrice humoristique Madhavi ! Vérifiez avant de laisser des bêtises sur le net ! En plus je vous ai donné des lien, pour que vous puissiez vérifier par vous même ! Vous êtes là à ergoter sur des majuscules, qui au passage, ne nuisent en rien à la lecture de l'article en question, bien au contraire, dans la règle de la dactylographie, cela met en évidence l'importance d'un mot, enfin, je crois que vous êtes con à ce niveau là ! De façon, j'ai les moyen de vous localiser !

C'est toi qui fait une école de journalisme, mon gars, tu devrais tout de suite de te faire rembourser ! T'es pas fait pour ce métier, un jour, tu vas te faire démolir avec ta belle tête de vainqueur ! Surtout, ne viens en pas en France !

Please speak English. Your edits are still non-constructive and disruptive, but if you continue to edit like this, you'll probably be blocked. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I speak a little French. I thinks he means to say

"I do not understand why you persist in adding/leaving erroneous information on Anbe Vaa. In particular, the artistic distribution (casting) of the film, you are completely wrong, such as the actress T. P. Muthulakshmi is not a nurse, but the mother of the character of actress Saroja Devi . The one who plays the nurse is the humorous actress Madhavi! Check before adding/leaving nonsense on the net! In addition I have given you the link for you to check it yourself! You are there to quibble with caps, which by the way, do not detract from reading the article, on the contrary, in the rule of typing, this highlights the importance of a word, finally, I believe that you are a con at this level! So I have the means to locate you!"

He has sort of taken a potshot at you, bro. But I believe you have resolved it yourself on the article's page. Thanks for that. I looked up T. P. Muthulakshmi on google images and she does look similar to Saroja Devi's mother in the film. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 11:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

En quoi, le fait de compléter, je dirais même de créer la page wikipedia du film AASAI MUGAM te gêner, puisqu'il n'y avait pratiquement rien ! Je t'apporte tout sur un plateau et gratuitement, je consacre du temps pour cela, serais-tu jaloux ? Si un travail "sérieux", digne de ce nom, avait été fait en amont, on aurait pas à faire ces modifications ! Non seulement, vous êtes incapable de le faire, mais vous empêchez aussi les autres de le faire dans de bonnes conditions, ce qui est encore plus grave ! Je vous plaints les gars ! En tout cas, vous êtes loin du professionnalisme de l'auteur du site, antrukandamugam.wordpress.com, vous devriez en prendre de la graine ! Ferdinand LACOUR.

Translation — "How, being complete, I would even create a wikipedia page of the film Aasai Mugam bother you, since there was nothing! I bring you everything on a tray and free, I spend time for this, would you be jealous? If a job "seriously," worthy of the name, had been done, we would not have to do these changes! Not only are you unable to do, but you also prevent others to do so in good conditions, which is even worse! I complained to you guys! In any case, you are far from the professionalism of the site author, antrukandamugam.wordpress.com, you should take a leaf!" — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 11:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

En résumé : fais correctement, dès le départ ton bouleau, comme çà, personne ne viendra redire quoique ce soit ! Et on sera quitte ! Sinon, je ne lâcherai pas le morceau, tu peux en être sûr, à n'en pas douter...

Please write in English next time so that the user understands you. Translation again — In summary: do correctly from the start. Then no one will complain about anything! And we will leave! Otherwise, I will not give it out, you can be sure, in no doubt ... — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lacour Ferdinand Octave, La prochaine fois, s'il vous plaît écrire en anglais. (Please write in English next time.) — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Si, j'avais remis de l'ordre dans la bande originale du film ANBE VAA, c'est parce que, c'était d'une part, dans l'ordre de passage, dans le film et de l'autre, il manquait l'autre version, finale de la chanson intitulée Anbe Vaa qui clôture le film de MGR. Sur ce morceau, le 10ème, c'est le couple de chanteurs, T. M. Soundararajan et P. Susheela qui l'interprètent. Je vois que vous n'avez encore rien compris ! Et le fait, que j'ai écrit en Français, ne devrait pas vous poser problèmes, il y a le traducteur automatique ou votre Kailash29792 qui, apparemment, connaîtrait la langue française et puis wikipedia n'est pas qu'en anglais, à ce que je sache ! F.LACOUR

Hi Kailash. Do refer this Wikipedia article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_film_series_with_two_entries — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianCinemaRasigan (talk • contribs) 20:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IndianCinemaRasigan, do please read WP:Cut and paste moves. Kailash29792 (talk) 20:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, the Baahubali duology has two feature length films. And the following Wikipedia article implies, two-film franchises qualify as 'Film Series'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_film_series_with_two_entries

I don't want to revert your edit again, as it may cause a misunderstanding between us. If you are convinced, please do consider naming the article as 'Baahubali (film series)'. Only if you are convinced. Let's not have a move war.IndianCinemaRasigan 20:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Let's be clear on something, IndianCinemaRasigan, List of film series with two entries is a list article that contains a lot of examples of two-part film series. It is not a policy page or a Manual of Style guideline, or anything else. And very few, if any, of those articles have links to [[Movie title (film series)]] articles. You should have discussed the move first, and you should base your decisions on established community guidelines, not list articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please take a look here. Your comments might help. Thanks.Krish | Talk 14:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kailash, please remember not to get yourself caught up in an edit-war situation yourself. The Lacour situation could easily have been remedied without making so many reverts. The fact that he wasn't explaining his edits, they were contrary to normal quotation standards, that he was removing a reference without explanation, and that he was only communicating in French should have been something that AIV or ANI could have handled. I'd hate to see a good editor like you get caught up in an edit-war block. Take care, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article Kalidas From Ssven2 to Kailash29792, for taking Kalidas the first South Indian film talkie to FA. Congratulations! — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 00:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats :) —Vensatry _(ping) 04:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For bringing Kalidas (film), the article related to the first south Indian sound film, to FA status. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So what's next? Mullum Malarum FAC / Thuppakki accolades' FLC / something else? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both are possible. But I plan to expand MM once I get this book Cinemavum Naanum by its director. Parasakthi looks like an excellent candidate though. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then go ahead with Parasakthi. Is Anushka Shetty's GA plan shelved BTW? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably. The user who wanted it to be GA with my help (Soham) has seemingly retired, and I did what he told me to do: clean it up. But I never had any serious intention to make it GA. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BLPs are truly a painful set of things to work on, especially related to South India. Wonder how Bollywood-related BLPs are turning GAs/FAs. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They are indeed a painful experience. Priyanka Chopra turning FA on its third attempt only, Shah Rukh Khan on second attempt... with frequent edit wars that make such articles unstable, I guess making a Bollywood BLP FA should be an achievement equal to reaching the moon. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood related BLPs like Padukone and Balan get promoted on their first attempt but even that is quite a tedious process too. Frankly, it's much easier working on films and getting them to GA, although it's a tough process for FA. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We can't even bring the BLP of an actor working in a single language to GA status. Such a scarcity of RS we have. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pavanjandhyala, I feel Prince's article has a good chance of becoming a GA with a good copyedit and reworking the lead and charity sections. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which Prince are you referring to Ssven2? If it is Mahesh Babu, then i took a small break from it recently to avoid a feel of monotony. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: I was referring to Mahesh Babu. Yep, in the words of the good doctor, "I sniff GA potential". — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I only use "sniff" for FA potential articles :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Ah yes. Well it's become quite a catchphrase I must say, Doc. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 11:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sniffing FA for Rod Steiger, we'll nom this coming week..♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: [1]. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 11:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Has Kailash or Pavanjandhyala seen any Steiger? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala and Kailash29792: Do see his films like Across the Bridge, In the Heat of the Night and No Way To Treat a Lady. They're all great ones. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will surely watch them. Have heard always good things about Kubrick, Steiger and Hitchcock (his Vertigo is my favourite). Let's see what Steiger has in store for me :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Today, with some strong help from Dr. Blofeld, i have completed my first (and probably the last) GA review of Jacqueline Fernandez. I promoted it and suggested its nominator FrB.TG to get it c/ed by a member of GOCE for further tightening of the prose which i find okay enough for a good article standard. Thought i should share this with you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your amazing work on Kalidas and taking it to FA status. Krish | Talk 16:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, i asked you plenty of times to look at my flcs, you promised but never showed up. Are there any reasons? Just asking.Krish | Talk 17:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I already said before, I have exams (which end tomorrow, the 15th) and then I'll look into your FLCs. Kailash29792 (talk)

Thanks for uploading File:Raja rani tamil.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have you watched the trailer of The Jungle Book (2016 film)? This looks like a super adventure. I was blown away with the trailer. The sound effects along with the visuals is a standout. Plus, Scarlett Johansson's voice as Kaa is very haunting. Never got excited like this in a long long time. Eagerly waiting for this one.Krish | Talk 05:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did see the trailer, and I am awaiting the film release. Don't you think that despite being a Disney film, it looks like another one of those dark and gritty reboots? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. I guess Maleficent's success inspired such reboots. Branagh however, pretty much stuck to the original 1950 film of Cinderella. This 2016 version of Kipling's novel too is pretty good, especially the CGI. King Louie's and Kaa's characters are more darker. Johansson's voice is haunting. But none can come close to Sterling Holloway w.r.t humour. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree with both of you. The Jungle Book looks like Nolan's take on Batman and it looks spellbinding. CGI is another plus point of the film. But, Maleficent was not a great film like Cinderella was. I also believe that it could have been darker.Krish | Talk 05:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Krish!: I actually meant Maleficent's "commercial" success. Cinderella was really excellent, especially the portions where the mice make the palace men and the prince notice her in the climax. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah! Absolutely right. Cinderella was a whole new different experience. I did like Maleficent too. Hey, we all like watching good people getting their due and loving each other. Don't we? Most of the Disney films are about that and i love it. Cate Blanchett's performance in the film was something. I never loved a bad character like this one. I was thinking if the Stepmother could also live happily ever after with Cinderella and Kit.Krish | Talk 05:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Krish!: Speaking of Blanchett, she's Kaa in the 2017 film by our precious. Watch the 1950 film too if you want to see Lady Tremaine in action. Blanchett couldn't have lived happily with Kit because that's how her character is. She would still feel jealous of Cinderella. It's in her nature. I liked Bonham Carter in the film very much though. She tried a positive role for a change. I totally despised her in the HP films and for killing him too. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssven2: I meant to say that she was so wonderful as Lady Tremaine that i wanted if she could be a good stepmother. I love Blanchett so much. She is easily the best actress since Meryl Streep and Jodie Foster. Only Jessica Chastain and Jennifer Lawrence comes close to her. Speaking of Carter, she was fab as The Fairy Godmother and Bellatrix was very evil. I loved her in Harry Potter films.Krish | Talk 06:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Krish!: BTW, caught up with Age of Ultron a couple of days ago on Blu-ray. Simply amazing! Spader and Olsen rock! Banner does fall in love with Romanoff, but doesn't go forward with it for both their benefits. I felt that there was something going on in the first film as well between the duo when she goes to India to find him. Where does it leave Betty Ross then? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssven2: I had seen the film 7 times in theatre because i really loved (and enjoyed) the film. Olsen as Scarlett Witch was, hands down, the best of the lot. These films are getting so much exciting.Krish | Talk 06:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you both forgot that it was Burton's Alice in Wonderland that possibly inspired Disney to go dark in their live action remakes of their own films. But it was more creepy than gritty. As for the Banner-Betty Ross relationship, bad that Whedon didn't think about that. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes! Burton did it in 2010. Thanks for that. I would call it more of an Errol Flynn, Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. type of swashbuckling film than creepy (particularly when she goes to rescue the Hatter and her battle with the Jabberwocky). — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:59, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, all the credit of this "Animated->Live-action" goes to Alice in Wonderland. However, it was very boring film IMO. I hope it's sequel is better. Plus, can do anything to watch Emma Watson as Belle in the Beauty and the Beast. God too many upcoming films that I'm excited about.Krish | Talk 06:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will 101 Dalmatians and The Jungle Book from the 90s also count as part of Disney's series of live action adaptations? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it does. But the Glenn Close film is not that dark (more along the lines of the Home Alone films), while the 1994 film is quite dark, especially the way Boone, Buldeo, Harley and Wilkins die. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But, i don't think so. 101 Dalmations was an average film in terms of critical and commerce aspects. The 1994 Jungle Book won't be counted as a Disney film because it was not produced by Disney. It was just an adaptation. Actually, the 2016 film is the remake/reboot/ live-action version of the 1967 film. Only the Walt Disney Animated Classics are getting transformed in to live-action films and not other ones.Krish | Talk 06:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! that was a wrong link. This is the films which are regarded as the Walt Disney Animated Classics.Krish | Talk 06:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you forgot what you had said. Nevermind here and here. Do put your comments. Thanks!Krish | Talk 18:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Kailash, I have already resolved your comments on Kaif's flc. Also, it would be great if you could take a look at Mary Kom flc. Thanks.Krish | Talk 19:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The GOCE edit has been completed by User:Corinne as per this edit. I have removed the note at the GAN page as a result. BTW, do feel free to leave comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rod Steiger/archive1. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 02:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]